Clps Incorporation's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Clps Incorporation (CLPS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Clps Incorporation vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 172M vs 74,674M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+282.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-4.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Profitability: Its -3.9% net margin compares with 12.2% for the peer group.
- Scale: Clps Incorporation ranks #178 of 257 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Clps Incorporation accounted for 0.9% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.05M compares with $0.09M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CLPS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
With a net margin of -3.91 %, Clps Incorporation reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.16 %).
Clps Incorporation generated 0.92 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
Clps Incorporation vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Clps Incorporation reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Clps Incorporation and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Clps Incorporation's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Clps Incorporation's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CLPS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CLPS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CLPS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CLPS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Accenture Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Intuitive Machines Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Infosys Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Wipro Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Clps Incorporation's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Clps Incorporation's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Clps Incorporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | 27.03 | 172.21 |
| Accenture Plc | 139,021.58 | 74,183.45 |
| Infosys Limited | 50,430.12 | 20,158.00 |
| Wipro Limited | 20,481.67 | 9,871.00 |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | 1,748.22 | 490.12 |
| SUBTOTAL | 211,708.62 | 104,874.78 |
Sources: Clps Incorporation's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Clps Incorporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Clps Incorporation's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Clps Incorporation reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| College of Allied Educators Pte. Ltd. (CAE) | Company report | 85% |
| Sunline Tech | Company report | 85% |
| CSII | Company report | 85% |
| Amarsoft | Company report | 85% |
| Shenzhen Forms Syntron Information Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Infosys Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Wipro Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Accenture Plc | Company report | 85% |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Clps Incorporation's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Clps Incorporation reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Clps Incorporation's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | Academic Education Services 0.97 % |
| Accenture Plc | Americas 49.30 % |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Clps Incorporation's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | 27 | 46,481 | -3,558 |
| Accenture Plc | 139,022 | 91,134 | 10,284 |
| Infosys Limited | 50,430 | 77,645 | 12,773 |
| Wipro Limited | 20,482 | 315,993 | 45,265 |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | 1,748 | 289,156 | -109,135 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 211,682 | 94,621 | 11,672 |
Clps Incorporation's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | CN 63.59 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Clps Incorporation's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 233 companies in Clps Incorporation's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Clps Incorporation ranks #178 of 233 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,700, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,943,010 | 50.77 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 477,854 | 6.15 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 373,662 | 4.81 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 295,166 | 3.80 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Snowflake Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 178 | Clps Incorporation | 25 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Clps Incorporation's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-10-16.
Clps Incorporation's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 173 | Aether Holdings Inc | 32 | -52.51 % |
| 174 | Skkynet Cloud Systems Inc | 32 | - |
| 175 | Motorsport Games Inc | 30 | 133.33 % |
| 176 | Lottery com Inc | 26 | -64.94 % |
| 177 | Beamr Imaging Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 178 | Clps Incorporation | 25 | -15.48 % |
| 179 | Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 180 | Cyberloq Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 181 | Firefly Neuroscience Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 182 | Intellinetics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 183 | Aware Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Clps Incorporation's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-10-16. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Clps Incorporation's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (440 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.07 % | 55.95 % (avg) | -33.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | -3.27 % | industry median | +2.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -0.83 % | 2.53 % (avg) | -3.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.01 % | 5.38 % (avg) | -5.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Clps Incorporation's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (440 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 38.9x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 19.7x | - |
| P/B | 0.5x | 5.4x | -4.9x |
| Return on Equity | -12.69 % | industry aggregate | -34.65 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -4.46 % | 0.05 % (avg) | -4.51 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Clps Incorporation's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Clps Incorporation's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Clps Incorporation is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Clps Incorporation's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Clps Incorporation's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Clps Incorporation falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 11.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Microsoft Corporation alone holds 51% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Clps Incorporation's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,700 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.01 % vs industry average 5.38 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Clps Incorporation's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Clps Incorporation's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Clps Incorporation's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Clps Incorporation falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Clps Incorporation's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+282.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 34.7 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.2% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 50.77 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-4.8% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Clps Incorporation's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | 0.47 | 1.46 | 0.64 |
| Accenture Plc | 0.51 | 1.38 | 0.20 |
| Infosys Limited | 0.42 | 1.98 | 0.03 |
| Wipro Limited | 0.26 | 2.05 | 0.00 |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | 1.72 | 2.34 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Clps Incorporation's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | Q2 2025 | +4.7 % | - |
| Accenture Plc | Q3 2026 | +6.2 % | +40.7 % |
| Infosys Limited | Q1 2026 | +4.6 % | +4.9 % |
| Wipro Limited | Q1 2026 | -5.3 % | -8.6 % |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | Q2 2026 | +309.8 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +3.3 % | +9.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Clps Incorporation's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | Q2 2025 | +13.1 % | +7,638.5 % |
| Accenture Plc | Q3 2026 | +5.9 % | +131.9 % |
| Infosys Limited | Q1 2026 | +4.4 % | - |
| Wipro Limited | Q1 2026 | -3.4 % | -4.0 % |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +198.8 % |
Clps Incorporation's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | - | - | - |
| Accenture Plc | 12.18% | 18.35% | 25.70% |
| Infosys Limited | 20.16% | 30.31% | 33.70% |
| Wipro Limited | 9.35% | 10.18% | 14.94% |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Clps Incorporation's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Clps Incorporation | - | 0.16 |
| Accenture Plc | 16.94 | 1.87 |
| Infosys Limited | 16.11 | 2.50 |
| Wipro Limited | 7.80 | 2.07 |
| Intuitive Machines Inc | - | 3.57 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 16.41 | 2.02 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.