Clean Energy Fuels's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Clean Energy Fuels vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 446M vs 115M combined for tracked competitors (79.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-1.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+9.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Clean Energy Fuels generated 7.0% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 28.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -13.7% net margin compares with -22.7% for the peer group.
- Scale: Clean Energy Fuels ranks #42 of 49 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Clean Energy Fuels accounted for 77.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 80.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.89M compares with $0.50M for the peer group (1.8x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CLNE Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Clean Energy Fuels reported revenue growth of 6.96 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 28.29 %.
With a net margin of -13.70 %, Clean Energy Fuels achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-22.65 %).
Clean Energy Fuels generated 77.62 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 80.62 % a year earlier.
Clean Energy Fuels vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Clean Energy Fuels and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Clean Energy Fuels's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 24.5% year over year, combined, vs 7.0% for Clean Energy Fuels. Clean Energy Fuels's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.04% to 0.04%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Clean Energy Fuels's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | No | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CLNE Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CLNE Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CLNE Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CLNE Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nextnrg Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Clean Energy Fuels's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Clean Energy Fuels's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Clean Energy Fuels Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | 350.21 | 445.77 |
| Nextnrg Inc | 14.24 | 94.68 |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | 6.00 | 20.66 |
| SUBTOTAL | 370.45 | 561.11 |
Sources: Clean Energy Fuels Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Clean Energy Fuels Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Clean Energy Fuels's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Stabilis Solutions Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Clean Energy Fuels's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Clean Energy Fuels's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | Single reportable segment 100.00 % |
| Nextnrg Inc | Mobile Fuel Delivery 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Clean Energy Fuels's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | 350 | 886,225 | -188,388 |
| Nextnrg Inc | 14 | 534,905 | -341,785 |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | 6 | 397,346 | -55,750 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 20 | 503,669 | -276,834 |
Clean Energy Fuels's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | US 97.45 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Clean Energy Fuels's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 48 companies in Clean Energy Fuels's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Clean Energy Fuels ranks #42 of 48 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.04 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 599, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enbridge Inc | 102,251 | 10.44 % |
| 2 | Williams companies inc | 83,937 | 8.57 % |
| 3 | Enterprise Products Partners L p | 80,470 | 8.21 % |
| 4 | Energy Transfer Lp | 69,678 | 7.11 % |
| 5 | Kinder Morgan Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Tc Energy Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Targa Resources Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Cheniere Energy Partners L p | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Mplx Lp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cheniere Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 42 | Clean Energy Fuels Corp | 352 | 0.04 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Clean Energy Fuels's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Clean Energy Fuels's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | Nextdecade Corporation | 1,766 | -3.13 % |
| 38 | Genesis Energy Lp | 1,729 | -15.09 % |
| 39 | Excelerate Energy Inc | 1,065 | 31.85 % |
| 40 | Summit Midstream Corporation | 431 | 36.68 % |
| 41 | Montauk Renewables Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 42 | Clean Energy Fuels Corp | 352 | -39.62 % |
| 43 | Rgc Resources Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 44 | Stabilis Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 45 | Opal Fuels Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 46 | New Fortress Energy Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 47 | Clean Energy Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Clean Energy Fuels's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Clean Energy Fuels's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Natural Gas Utilities industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (81 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 58.03 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -7.26 % | industry median | -24.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -5.07 % | 31.10 % (avg) | -36.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 5.33 % | 20.19 % (avg) | -14.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Clean Energy Fuels's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Natural Gas Utilities industry average (81 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 21.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 11.4x | - |
| P/B | 0.8x | 2.6x | -1.8x |
| Return on Equity | -16.64 % | industry aggregate | -45.78 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.08 % | 6.01 % (avg) | -8.09 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Clean Energy Fuels's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -15.16 % | 1.41 % | -0.68 % | -15.21 % | -12.37 % | 64.35 % | -2.19 % | 2.16 % |
| Operating Margin | -39.36 % | 1.12 % | 2.89 % | -3.37 % | -37.18 % | -12.31 % | -8.74 % | -37.63 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -10.63 % | 0.33 % | 0.88 % | -0.86 % | -6.32 % | -3.18 % | -1.99 % | -9.89 % |
| P/E | - | - | 23.6x | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Clean Energy Fuels's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Clean Energy Fuels's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Clean Energy Fuels is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Clean Energy Fuels's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Clean Energy Fuels's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Clean Energy Fuels falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 6.7% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Clean Energy Fuels's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 599 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 5.33 % vs industry average 20.19 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Clean Energy Fuels's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Clean Energy Fuels's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Clean Energy Fuels's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Clean Energy Fuels falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Clean Energy Fuels's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 24.0 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 45.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Clean Energy Fuels's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | 0.10 | 2.49 | 0.42 |
| Nextnrg Inc | 0.02 | 0.15 | - |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | 0.03 | 1.42 | 0.17 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Clean Energy Fuels's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | Q2 2026 | +7.0 % | - |
| Nextnrg Inc | Q2 2026 | +40.9 % | - |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | Q2 2026 | -21.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.1 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Clean Energy Fuels's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | Q2 2026 | - | -26.5 % |
| Nextnrg Inc | Q2 2026 | +42.3 % | - |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | Q2 2026 | -15.9 % | -86.4 % |
Clean Energy Fuels's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | - | - | - |
| Nextnrg Inc | - | - | - |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Clean Energy Fuels's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels Corp | - | 0.79 |
| Nextnrg Inc | - | 0.15 |
| Yunhong Green Cti Ltd | - | 0.29 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.66 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.