Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V (CIGF5) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 0M combined for tracked competitors (42.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-18.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V generated -5.0% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2023, vs 6.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -57.4% net margin compares with -142.5% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V accounted for 47.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 50.2% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CIGF5 Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2023
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V reported revenue contraction of 5.04 % year on year in Q3 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 5.98 %.
With a net margin of -57.44 %, Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-142.46 %).
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V generated 47.44 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 50.18 % a year earlier.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V vs. its Competitors, Q3 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Rental & Leasing industry grew revenue 10.3% year over year, combined, vs -5.0% for Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V. Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (3) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CIGF5 Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CIGF5 Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orix Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | - | 0.16 |
| Orix Corporation | 42,845.54 | 22,134.59 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | - | 0.94 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | - | 0.22 |
| SUBTOTAL | 42,845.54 | 22,135.90 |
Sources: Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| CCC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alliant Techsystems, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Automatic Data Processing | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | - | - | - |
| Orix Corporation | 42,846 | 593,643 | 79,715 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | - | 20,861 | -7,071 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | - | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 42,846 | 592,959 | 79,606 |
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Rental & Leasing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (46 companies). See the full Rental & Leasing industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.00 % | 54.95 % (avg) | +45.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -78.31 % | industry median | -86.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -32.28 % | 16.18 % (avg) | -48.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 6.30 % (avg) | -6.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 180.02 % | -13.62 % | -7.74 % | -7.24 % | -36.55 % | -39.79 % | -15.63 % |
| Operating Margin | 49.96 % | 72.09 % | 78.79 % | 83.85 % | 17.67 % | -13.02 % | -72.20 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 56.84 % | 73.51 % | 87.35 % | 106.44 % | 68.73 % | 7.86 % | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 6.30 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 86.0 points below the industry median.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (66.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-18.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | - | 0.15 | - |
| Orix Corporation | 0.21 | 1.03 | 1.43 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | - | 8.61 | 0.13 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | - | 0.57 | 0.85 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | Q3 2023 | -5.0 % | - |
| Orix Corporation | Q1 2025 | +11.2 % | +22.1 % |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | Q1 2023 | -29.7 % | - |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | Q3 2023 | +6.0 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.2 % | +22.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | Q3 2023 | - | - |
| Orix Corporation | Q1 2025 | +17.1 % | -5.8 % |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | Q1 2023 | - | - |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | Q3 2023 | - | - |
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | - | - | - |
| Orix Corporation | 2.63% | 2.62% | 10.34% |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | - | - | - |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Commonwealth Income And Growth Fund V's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund V | - | - |
| Orix Corporation | 14.44 | 1.94 |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | - | - |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vi | - | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 14.42 | 1.94 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.