Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Sustainable Projects Group Inc (BUES) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Sustainable Projects Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 132,205M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.01M compares with $0.62M for the peer group (0.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Sustainable Projects Group Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Sustainable Projects Group Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Sustainable Projects Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (11) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BUES Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comerica Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | National Presto Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Lithium Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Commercial Metals Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Est e Lauder Companies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sustainable Projects Group Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Sustainable Projects Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | - | 0.01 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 352,061.93 | 87,032.00 |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | 33,842.50 | 15,049.00 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 32,473.42 | 16,582.00 |
| Comerica Incorporated | 11,527.10 | 3,234.00 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 6,937.50 | 8,850.09 |
| SUBTOTAL | 438,201.53 | 136,039.21 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
Sources: Sustainable Projects Group Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Sustainable Projects Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Lithium Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Sustainable Projects Group Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Procter and Gamble Co | Fabric & Home Care 34.83 % |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | North America (NA) 64.41 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | North America Steel Group 72.06 % |
| National Presto Industries Inc | Defense 86.60 % |
| Usana Health Sciences Inc | Core nutritional 81.83 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | - | 6,120 | -3,177,203 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 352,062 | 836,846 | 155,231 |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | 33,842 | 273,618 | 3,309 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 32,473 | 460,611 | 55,250 |
| Comerica Incorporated | 11,527 | 410,771 | 91,071 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 6,937 | 697,406 | 61,777 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 438,202 | 620,147 | 86,625 |
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Procter and Gamble Co | Non-US 52.05 % |
| Usana Health Sciences Inc | Greater China 49.38 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | -2,189.41 % | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 14.39 % | -14.00 % | -19.65 % | -28.71 % | -78.25 % | -77.30 % | 32.93 % | -363.13 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 457.7 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-2.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | 0.27 | 0.46 | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 0.25 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | 0.04 | 1.27 | 1.88 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 0.10 | 0.80 | 4.08 |
| Comerica Incorporated | 0.01 | 1.06 | 0.85 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 0.58 | 2.55 | 0.74 |
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | Q3 2024 | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q2 2026 | +1.5 % | -15.0 % |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | - |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | Q2 2026 | +0.6 % | -31.6 % |
| Comerica Incorporated | Q3 2025 | +2.4 % | -4.3 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +335.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +2.9 % | -3.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | Q3 2024 | - | -97.5 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q2 2026 | +2.7 % | +2.7 % |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | Q2 2026 | -6.8 % | -27.1 % |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | Q2 2026 | -4.5 % | +78.7 % |
| Comerica Incorporated | Q3 2025 | +57.1 % | - |
| Commercial Metals Company | Q2 2026 | +17.9 % | +74.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | - | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 12.72% | 17.81% | 30.05% |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | 0.93% | 1.36% | 4.68% |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 11.41% | 19.70% | 115.54% |
| Comerica Incorporated | 0.92% | 2.24% | 10.29% |
| Commercial Metals Company | 9.30% | 9.96% | 18.10% |
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Sustainable Projects Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Projects Group Inc | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 22.05 | 4.05 |
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | 189.33 | 2.25 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 16.57 | 1.96 |
| Comerica Incorporated | 16.94 | 3.56 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 11.74 | 0.78 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 23.06 | 3.22 |
Sign in to see all peers for Sustainable Projects Group Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.