Baker Hughes's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Baker Hughes (BKR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Baker Hughes vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 27,893M vs 246,054M combined for tracked competitors (10.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-5.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-3.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Baker Hughes generated 2.5% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 6.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 14.2% net margin compares with 8.1% for the peer group.
- Scale: Baker Hughes ranks #4 of 58 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry, holding 10.8% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Baker Hughes accounted for 9.9% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 10.3% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.50M compares with $0.46M for the peer group (1.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BKR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Baker Hughes reported revenue growth of 2.49 % year on year in Q1 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 6.80 %.
With a net margin of 14.24 %, Baker Hughes achieved higher profitability than its competitors (8.07 %).
Baker Hughes generated 9.94 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 10.32 % a year earlier.
Baker Hughes vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Baker Hughes and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (15) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Baker Hughes's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry grew revenue 19.9% year over year, combined, vs 2.5% for Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes's share of combined industry revenue moved from 10.83% to 9.26%, a loss of 1.58 percentage points.
Baker Hughes's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (41) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (19) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BKR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BKR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
BKR Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
BKR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nine Energy Service Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Forum Energy Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | National Energy Services Reunited Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Matson inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Nabors Industries Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Baker Hughes's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Baker Hughes's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Baker Hughes Company
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | 57,120.00 | 27,893.00 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197.28 | 50,638.00 |
| Slb Limited | 77,543.94 | 36,365.00 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 28,565.79 | 10,420.10 |
| Halliburton Company | 27,176.34 | 22,373.00 |
| Dover Corp | 25,955.69 | 8,420.56 |
| SUBTOTAL | 690,546.51 | 277,808.24 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Baker Hughes Company.
Sources: Baker Hughes Company's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Baker Hughes Company versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Baker Hughes's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Weatherford | Named by the company | 85% |
| Npk International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Flowserve | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cactus inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ncs Multistage Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Superior Drilling Products Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oil States International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| ChampionX | Named by the company | 85% |
| EthosEnergy | Named by the company | 85% |
| MAN Energy Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| MTU | Named by the company | 85% |
| Siemens Energy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aker Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dril-Quip Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Honeywell Process Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | Named by the company | 85% |
| Schlumberger | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sulzer | Named by the company | 85% |
| Helix Energy Solutions Group inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Chart | Named by the company | 85% |
| Masaood John Brown | Named by the company | 85% |
| NOV | Named by the company | 85% |
| SLB | Named by the company | 85% |
| Drilling Tools International Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aker Solutions ASA | Named by the company | 85% |
| NR | Named by the company | 85% |
| Emerson | Named by the company | 85% |
| IMI | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industry | Named by the company | 85% |
| Schneider Electric | Named by the company | 85% |
| TechnipFMC | Named by the company | 85% |
| ABB | Named by the company | 85% |
| Chromalloy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Halliburton | Named by the company | 85% |
| Metso Outotec | Named by the company | 85% |
| Olympus | Named by the company | 85% |
| Solar (a Caterpillar company) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Forum Energy Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rpc inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tesco Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Baker Hughes's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Baker Hughes's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | Oilfield Services and Equipment 52.34 % |
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % |
| Slb Limited | Production Systems 42.03 % |
| Technipfmc Plc | Subsea 88.59 % |
| Halliburton Company | Completion and Production 55.83 % |
| Dover Corp | Clean Energy & Fueling 27.17 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
Baker Hughes's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | 57,120 | 498,089 | 56,304 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197 | 888,386 | 157,579 |
| Slb Limited | 77,544 | 333,624 | 28,899 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 28,566 | 410,127 | 46,345 |
| Halliburton Company | 27,176 | 466,104 | 33,479 |
| Dover Corp | 25,956 | 350,857 | 90,018 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 633,427 | 458,241 | 35,005 |
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
Baker Hughes's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Slb Limited | Middle East 28.67 % |
| Halliburton Company | North America 39.54 % |
| Dover Corp | United States 55.59 % |
| Jacobs Solutions Inc | United States 68.89 % |
| Flowserve Corp | North America 44.53 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
Baker Hughes's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 55 companies in Baker Hughes's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Baker Hughes ranks #4 of 55 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 10.77 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,210, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 125,873 | 23.49 % |
| 2 | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 91,960 | 17.16 % |
| 3 | Barrick Mining Corp | 70,072 | 13.07 % |
| 4 | Baker Hughes Company | 57,700 | 10.77 % |
| 5 | Technipfmc Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Rbc Bearings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Mueller Industries Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Generac Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Crane Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Watts Water Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Baker Hughes's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Baker Hughes's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 125,873 | 31.88 % |
| 2 | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 91,960 | 20.49 % |
| 3 | Barrick Mining Corp | 70,072 | 19.82 % |
| 4 | Baker Hughes Company | 57,700 | 15.17 % |
| 5 | Technipfmc Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Rbc Bearings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Mueller Industries Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Generac Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Crane Company | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Baker Hughes's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Baker Hughes's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (65 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.05 % | 29.68 % (avg) | +18.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | 36.54 % | industry median | +25.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 17.68 % | 11.51 % (avg) | +6.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.69 % | 8.98 % (avg) | -4.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Baker Hughes's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry average (65 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.5x | 26.8x | -8.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.5x | 14.2x | -0.7x |
| P/B | 3.1x | 3.7x | -0.6x |
| Return on Equity | 16.88 % | industry aggregate | 1.76 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 21.76 % | 5.40 % (avg) | 16.36 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Baker Hughes's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | -13.14 % | -0.98 % | 3.19 % | 20.56 % | 9.11 % | -0.34 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.55 % | 4.51 % | -77.17 % | 6.39 % | 5.60 % | 9.08 % | 11.07 % | 36.57 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 1.13 % | -31.42 % | 2.79 % | 3.04 % | 6.11 % | 7.79 % | 23.41 % |
| P/E | 81.9x | 107.6x | - | - | - | 17.8x | 13.5x | 18.3x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Baker Hughes's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Baker Hughes's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Baker Hughes is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Baker Hughes's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Baker Hughes's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Baker Hughes falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.46x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Baker Hughes's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,210 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.69 % vs industry average 8.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Baker Hughes's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Baker Hughes's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Baker Hughes's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Baker Hughes falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Baker Hughes's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 25.7 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-5.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.46x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (18.5x vs 26.8x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Losing revenue share to the broader industry (-1.6 points over the past year).
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-3.0% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Baker Hughes's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | - | 1.58 | 0.46 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.86 | 1.09 |
| Slb Limited | 0.20 | 1.37 | 0.38 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 0.19 | 1.12 | 0.13 |
| Halliburton Company | 0.36 | 2.02 | 0.68 |
| Dover Corp | - | 1.91 | 0.45 |
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Baker Hughes's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | Q1 2026 | +2.5 % | +129.3 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +16.6 % |
| Slb Limited | Q2 2026 | +5.0 % | -22.2 % |
| Technipfmc Plc | Q2 2026 | +9.0 % | +35.0 % |
| Halliburton Company | Q2 2026 | +3.7 % | +11.3 % |
| Dover Corp | Q2 2026 | +6.9 % | -50.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +8.1 % | -8.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Baker Hughes's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | Q1 2026 | +3.1 % | +12.0 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +540.9 % | +2.4 % |
| Slb Limited | Q2 2026 | +79.3 % | +29.0 % |
| Technipfmc Plc | Q2 2026 | - | -28.1 % |
| Halliburton Company | Q2 2026 | - | -33.6 % |
| Dover Corp | Q2 2026 | +6.4 % | -21.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
Baker Hughes's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | 7.43% | 11.19% | 16.88% |
| General Electric Company | 6.98% | 11.25% | 48.50% |
| Slb Limited | 5.73% | 7.18% | 11.58% |
| Technipfmc Plc | 11.54% | 22.48% | 35.07% |
| Halliburton Company | 6.36% | 7.98% | 15.08% |
| Dover Corp | 15.99% | 19.97% | 28.56% |
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Baker Hughes's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Company | 18.28 | 2.05 |
| General Electric Company | 37.57 | 6.58 |
| Slb Limited | 24.64 | 2.13 |
| Technipfmc Plc | 24.61 | 2.74 |
| Halliburton Company | 17.07 | 1.21 |
| Dover Corp | 23.10 | 3.08 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 31.04 | 2.49 |
Sign in to see all peers for Baker Hughes Company.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.