Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 11,093M vs 154,135M combined for tracked competitors (6.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.4%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding generated -4.2% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 5.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 7.1% net margin compares with 9.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding ranks #2 of 40 companies by market capitalization in the Consulting Services industry, holding 19.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding accounted for 6.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 7.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.35M compares with $0.21M for the peer group (1.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BAH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding reported revenue contraction of 4.24 % year on year in Q1 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 5.33 %.
With a net margin of 7.07 %, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding reported lower profitability than its competitors (9.78 %).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding generated 6.63 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 7.24 % a year earlier.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Booz Allen Hamilton Holding and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Consulting Services industry grew revenue 7.1% year over year, combined, vs -4.2% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 15.05% to 13.46%, a loss of 1.59 percentage points.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (17) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BAH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BAH Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
BAH Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
BAH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Science applications International corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Caci International Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Kvh Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Huron Consulting Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | General Dynamics Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 8,443.01 | 11,093.00 |
| Accenture Plc | 107,402.58 | 73,100.60 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,602.95 | 53,808.00 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,957.22 | 42,892.00 |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | 15,621.12 | 17,329.00 |
| Caci International Inc | 13,527.03 | 9,567.78 |
| SUBTOTAL | 347,486.05 | 257,056.27 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Sources: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Amentum Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dlh Holdings Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Icf International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Parsons Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Science applications International corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Maximus Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Time Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Accenture Plc | Americas 49.30 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Marine Systems 32.36 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Aeronautics Systems 32.36 % |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | Intelligence and Digital 33.11 % |
| Caci International Inc | Domestic Operations 96.71 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 8,443 | 352,159 | 24,698 |
| Accenture Plc | 107,403 | 93,839 | 10,006 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 91,603 | 459,897 | 37,103 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,957 | 5,718,933 | 599,467 |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | 15,621 | 346,580 | 28,640 |
| Caci International Inc | 13,527 | 354,362 | 19,845 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 339,043 | 210,926 | 18,236 |
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Northrop Grumman Corp | United States 85.81 % |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | United States 91.54 % |
| Parsons Corporation | North America 82.63 % |
| Amentum Holdings Inc | United States 77.86 % |
| Hackett Group Inc | US 81.11 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 34 companies in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Booz Allen Hamilton Holding ranks #2 of 34 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 19.25 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,706, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cgi Inc | 14,229 | 31.55 % |
| 2 | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 8,682 | 19.25 % |
| 3 | Genpact Limited | 5,520 | 12.24 % |
| 4 | Fti Consulting Inc | 3,861 | 8.56 % |
| 5 | Exponent Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Huron Consulting Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Astrana Health Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Icf International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Bowman Consulting Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Onterris Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cgi Inc | 14,229 | -24.45 % |
| 2 | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 8,682 | -25.93 % |
| 3 | Genpact Limited | 5,520 | -22.49 % |
| 4 | Fti Consulting Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Exponent Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Huron Consulting Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Astrana Health Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Consulting Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (44 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 52.96 % | 37.97 % (avg) | +15.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 9.51 % | industry median | +7.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.94 % | -0.92 % (avg) | +8.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 3.90 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Consulting Services industry average (44 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.2x | 27.6x | -16.4x |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.4x | 10.7x | +2.7x |
| P/B | 8.0x | 2.4x | +5.6x |
| Return on Equity | 72.27 % | industry aggregate | 50.59 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 15.76 % | 6.13 % (avg) | 9.63 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 5.26 % | 10.88 % | 7.90 % | 3.26 % | 11.83 % | 13.90 % | 14.07 % | -3.13 % |
| Operating Margin | 9.20 % | 9.01 % | 9.33 % | 8.73 % | 7.04 % | 6.84 % | 11.54 % | 9.16 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 18.58 % | 16.38 % | 15.80 % | 12.76 % | 11.11 % | 11.75 % | 22.35 % | 15.87 % |
| P/E | 16.9x | 24.1x | 22.7x | 20.4x | 32.1x | 41.2x | 21.4x | 13.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.61x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,706 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 7.4 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 50.6 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (11.2x vs 27.6x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Losing revenue share to the broader industry (-1.6 points over the past year).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 0.41 | 1.73 | 3.68 |
| Accenture Plc | 0.51 | 1.38 | 0.16 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 0.14 | 1.40 | 0.33 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 0.20 | 1.13 | 0.89 |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | 0.29 | 1.58 | 1.04 |
| Caci International Inc | 0.18 | 1.63 | 0.94 |
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Q2 2026 | -4.2 % | -26.9 % |
| Accenture Plc | Q2 2026 | +5.6 % | +6.3 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +10.3 % | +13.2 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +5.1 % | -6.8 % |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | Q1 2026 | +3.7 % | -8.2 % |
| Caci International Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.6 % | -0.7 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.0 % | +0.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Q2 2026 | -6.1 % | -13.0 % |
| Accenture Plc | Q2 2026 | +5.7 % | +10.1 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q1 2026 | +13.1 % | +43.0 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q2 2026 | +34.2 % | +30.7 % |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | Q1 2026 | +4.3 % | +40.9 % |
| Caci International Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.3 % | +67.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 10.66% | 13.72% | 72.27% |
| Accenture Plc | 11.69% | 18.04% | 24.02% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 7.52% | 13.52% | 17.41% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 8.93% | 11.14% | 26.58% |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | 10.23% | 12.77% | 29.10% |
| Caci International Inc | 5.22% | 5.69% | 12.68% |
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 11.04 | 0.76 |
| Accenture Plc | 13.95 | 1.47 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 20.99 | 1.70 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 16.31 | 1.70 |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | 11.19 | 0.90 |
| Caci International Inc | 25.24 | 1.41 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 15.76 | 1.35 |
Sign in to see all peers for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.