Ambarella Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ambarella Inc (AMBA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ambarella Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 416M vs 535,238M combined for tracked competitors (0.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+22.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ambarella Inc generated 13.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 71.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -6.2% net margin compares with 40.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: Ambarella Inc ranks #57 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Ambarella Inc accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.43M compares with $1.50M for the peer group (0.3x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
AMBA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Ambarella Inc reported revenue growth of 13.54 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 71.01 %.
With a net margin of -6.19 %, Ambarella Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (40.43 %).
Ambarella Inc generated 0.07 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.10 % a year earlier.
Ambarella Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ambarella Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ambarella Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 10.5% year over year, combined, vs 13.5% for Ambarella Inc. Ambarella Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Ambarella Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (31) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
AMBA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
AMBA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
AMBA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
AMBA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maxlinear Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Intel Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Marvell Technology Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Silicom Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Semtech Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ambarella Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Ambarella Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Our competitors range from large, international companies offering a wide range of semiconductor products to smaller companies specializing in narrow markets. In the wearable sports camera market, our primary competitors are vertically integrated divisions of camera device OEMs, including Sony Corporation, or Sony, and Panasonic Corporation, as well as HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd., or HiSilicon, and Socionext Inc., or Socionext, an entity created from the merger of the system LSI businesses of Fujitsu Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation. In the IP security camera market, our primary competitors include Fullhan Microelectronics Co., Ltd., Geo Semiconductor, Inc., Grain Media, Inc., which was recently acquired by Novatek Microelectronics Corp., or Novatek, HiSilicon, Intel Corporation, or Intel, Movidius Ltd., which was recently acquired by Intel, OmniVision Technologies, Inc., or OmniVision, Qualcomm Incorporated, or Qualcomm, Realtek Semiconductor Corp., Socionext, and Texas Instruments Incorporated, or Texas Instruments, as well as vertically integrated divisions of IP Security camera device OEMs, including Axis Communications AB and Sony. In the automotive camera market, we compete against Allwinner Technology Co., Ltd., Alpha Imaging Technology Corp., Core Logic, Inc., Novatek, NXP Semiconductors N.V., OmniVision, Qualcomm, Renesas Electronics Corporation, Sunplus Technology Co. Ltd., and Texas Instruments. Our primary competitors in the UAV camera market include HiSilicon, Intel, NVIDIA Corporation and Qualcomm. Our primary competitors in the infrastructure market include GigPeak, Inc., Intel, and Texas Instruments. Certain of our customers and suppliers also have divisions that produce products competitive with ours.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on elements both within and outside of our control, including industry and general economic trends. Many of our competitors are substantially larger, have greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, customer support and other resources, are more established than we are, and have significantly better brand recognition and broader product offerings which may enable them to develop and enable new technology into product solutions better or faster than us and to better withstand adverse economic or market conditions in the future.
Our ability to compete successfully in the rapidly evolving HD video market depends on several factors, including:
the design and manufacturing of new solutions, including software, that anticipate the video processing and integration needs of our customers’ next-generation products and applications;
performance of our solutions, as measured by video and still picture image quality, resolution and frame processing rates;
power consumption of our solutions;
the ease of implementation of our products by customers;
the strength of customer relationships;
the selection of the foundry process technology and architecture tradeoffs to meet customers’ product requirements in a timely manner;
reputation and reliability;
customer support; and
the cost of the total solution.
We believe we compete favorably with respect to these factors, particularly because our solutions typically provide high-performance and low power consumption video, efficient integration of our advanced algorithms, exceptional storage and transmission efficiencies at lower power, highly-integrated SoC solutions based on a scalable platform, and comprehensive and flexible software. We cannot ensure, however, that our solutions will continue to compete favorably or that we will be successful in the face of increasing competition from new products introduced by existing or new competitors.
Publicly Traded Peers of Ambarella Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | 3,022.30 | 416.17 |
| Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865.10 | 302,969.00 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,708,348.59 | 89,104.00 |
| Intel Corporation | 592,217.12 | 57,032.00 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 256,045.20 | 19,453.00 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 225,022.27 | 8,715.90 |
| SUBTOTAL | 9,046,021.54 | 575,762.49 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Ambarella Inc .
Sources: Ambarella Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ambarella Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ambarella Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| AMLogic Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Huawei Technologies Co. | Named by the company | 85% |
| NVIDIA Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mobileye Global inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Geo Semiconductor, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Movidius Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| SigmaStar Technology Corp. | Named by the company | 85% |
| OmniVision Technologies, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fullhan Microelectronics Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ingenic Semiconductor Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | Named by the company | 85% |
| Maxlinear Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Novatek Microelectronics Corp. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Socionext Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Intel Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sigma | Named by the company | 85% |
| Synaptics Incorporated | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ambarella Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Ambarella Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Nvidia Corp | Compute and Networking 91.34 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Semiconductor Solutions 64.81 % |
| Intel Corporation | Client Computing Group 56.91 % |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | Analog 81.33 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Ambarella Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | 3,022 | 433,959 | -84,100 |
| Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865 | 7,213,548 | 4,592,357 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,708,349 | 2,700,121 | 1,159,545 |
| Intel Corporation | 592,217 | 670,176 | -133,690 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 256,045 | 589,485 | 183,394 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 225,022 | 1,165,227 | 676,350 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 9,042,999 | 1,499,844 | 643,564 |
Ambarella Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | Asia Pacific other than Taiwan 23.34 % |
| Nvidia Corp | United States 78.13 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Asia Pacific 60.15 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | China 43.75 % |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | CN 51.13 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | United Kingdom 25.92 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Ambarella Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 109 companies in Ambarella Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ambarella Inc ranks #57 of 109 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.02 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,373, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865 | 44.31 % |
| 2 | Broadcom Inc | 1,783,853 | 14.22 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 1,206,807 | 9.62 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,008,456 | 8.04 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 57 | Ambarella Inc | 3,022 | 0.02 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ambarella Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Ambarella Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | Daqo New Energy Corp | 3,671 | -63.84 % |
| 53 | Ultra Clean Holdings Inc | 3,599 | 183.13 % |
| 54 | Ipg Photonics Corp | 3,314 | -3.56 % |
| 55 | Osi Systems inc | 3,077 | -16.06 % |
| 56 | Penguin Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 57 | Ambarella Inc | 3,022 | -16.78 % |
| 58 | Benchmark Electronics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 59 | Power Integrations Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 60 | Navitas Semiconductor Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 61 | Himax Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 62 | Nlight Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ambarella Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Ambarella Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (151 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 58.75 % | 34.40 % (avg) | +24.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | -14.96 % | industry median | -17.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -6.94 % | 7.07 % (avg) | -14.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.23 % | 9.39 % (avg) | -5.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ambarella Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (151 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Semiconductors industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 43.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 22.7x | - |
| P/B | 5.4x | 6.6x | -1.2x |
| Return on Equity | -13.38 % | industry aggregate | -60.21 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -5.07 % | -0.16 % (avg) | -4.91 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Ambarella Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -22.90 % | 0.42 % | 0.00 % | -2.51 % | 43.76 % | 5.31 % | 25.65 % | 37.55 % |
| Operating Margin | -17.75 % | -21.71 % | -21.71 % | -27.43 % | -15.17 % | -21.99 % | -54.62 % | -21.20 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -4.61 % | -5.58 % | -5.22 % | -5.78 % | -4.08 % | -6.20 % | -13.81 % | -6.99 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ambarella Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Ambarella Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Ambarella Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Ambarella Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Ambarella Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Ambarella Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 44% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Ambarella Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,373 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.23 % vs industry average 9.39 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ambarella Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ambarella Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ambarella Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ambarella Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ambarella Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 17.8 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 60.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.3% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 44.31 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ambarella Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | 0.93 | 2.54 | - |
| Nvidia Corp | 0.40 | 4.07 | 0.09 |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.99 | 2.05 | 0.75 |
| Intel Corporation | 0.44 | 1.86 | 0.40 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1.09 | 4.53 | 0.88 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 0.98 | 2.25 | 0.31 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ambarella Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.5 % | - |
| Nvidia Corp | Q2 2026 | +105.9 % | +125.9 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +85.5 % | +216.1 % |
| Intel Corporation | Q2 2026 | +25.4 % | - |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +22.8 % | +52.9 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Q1 2026 | +27.6 % | -70.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +66.6 % | +104.9 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ambarella Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.2 % | +65.5 % |
| Nvidia Corp | Q2 2026 | +86.8 % | +41.3 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +74.0 % | +274.6 % |
| Intel Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.2 % | -28.0 % |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +12.7 % | -60.6 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Q1 2026 | +22.8 % | +30.3 % |
Ambarella Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | - | - | - |
| Nvidia Corp | 81.41% | 95.06% | 110.11% |
| Broadcom Inc | 21.57% | 24.07% | 43.74% |
| Intel Corporation | - | - | - |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 17.31% | 18.74% | 35.77% |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 22.14% | 25.02% | 33.73% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ambarella Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ambarella Inc | - | 7.26 |
| Nvidia Corp | 28.97 | 18.34 |
| Broadcom Inc | 44.53 | 19.17 |
| Intel Corporation | - | 10.38 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 42.36 | 13.16 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 86.39 | 25.82 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 36.65 | 15.71 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.