Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd (YMM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,786M vs 7,560M combined for tracked competitors (19.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+3.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd generated 16.0% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 16.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 35.7% net margin compares with 1.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd ranks #8 of 260 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 2.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd accounted for 47.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 47.8% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.22M compares with $0.39M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
YMM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd reported revenue growth of 16.00 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 16.79 %.
With a net margin of 35.70 %, Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd achieved higher profitability than its competitors (1.01 %).
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd generated 47.64 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 47.81 % a year earlier.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.0% year over year, combined, vs 16.0% for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd. Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.56% to 0.56%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (7) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
YMM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
YMM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
YMM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marqeta Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Elastic N v | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Uipath Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Confluent Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Sps Commerce Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The Group also competes with other companies for value-added services that cater to various essential needs of shippers and truckers. Players that focus on certain segments of the road transportation market may enter into new segments in which the Group operates and compete with it. Furthermore, large technology companies that have strong brand recognition, substantial financial resources and sophisticated technology capabilities may develop their own digital freight platforms in the future. The Group believes that its competitive advantage over existing and potential competitors lies in its large platform with powerful network effects, industry-wide logistics infrastructure that is digital, standardized and smart, comprehensive logistics and value-added services that drive increasing user engagement, proprietary and innovative technologies, and experienced management with technology and logistics expertise.
Publicly Traded Peers of Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 171,611.02 | 1,786.03 |
| Confluent Inc | 10,654.36 | 1,165.84 |
| Elastic N v | 9,202.06 | 1,802.63 |
| Procore Technologies Inc | 7,496.05 | 1,422.78 |
| Uipath Inc | 6,375.53 | 1,719.12 |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | 3,461.41 | 632.86 |
| SUBTOTAL | 213,567.33 | 9,978.90 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
Sources: Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Marqeta Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 171,611 | 216,462 | 77,280 |
| Confluent Inc | 10,654 | 359,716 | -91,106 |
| Elastic N v | 9,202 | 448,527 | 93,466 |
| Procore Technologies Inc | 7,496 | 321,823 | -8,794 |
| Uipath Inc | 6,376 | 431,831 | 90,911 |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | 3,461 | 423,037 | -48,487 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 41,956 | 389,321 | 19,923 |
Sign in to see all peers for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Elastic N v | United States 53.35 % |
| Procore Technologies Inc | United States 84.37 % |
| Uipath Inc | Americas 49.61 % |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | US 82.21 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 236 companies in Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd ranks #8 of 236 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 2.29 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,661, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,756,759 | 50.30 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 486,305 | 6.51 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 388,902 | 5.21 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 268,701 | 3.60 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 171,192 | 2.29 % |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 388,902 | -54.19 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 268,701 | -22.22 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 265,744 | -46.22 % |
| 6 | Salesforce Inc | 182,878 | -7.55 % |
| 7 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 171,192 | -37.13 % |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Snowflake Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 12 | Datadog Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Adobe Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (343 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 59.45 % | 64.28 % (avg) | -4.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | 33.20 % | industry median | +35.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 36.30 % | 2.53 % (avg) | +33.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.04 % | 4.79 % (avg) | -3.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (343 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 57.1x | 39.5x | +17.6x |
| EV / EBITDA | 385.7x | 21.7x | +364.0x |
| P/B | 43.3x | 5.4x | +37.9x |
| Return on Equity | 11.00 % | industry aggregate | -11.56 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.10 % | -0.26 % (avg) | 5.36 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 21.71 % | 29.58 % | 16.00 % |
| Operating Margin | 11.82 % | 22.02 % | 33.20 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 1.40 % | 3.28 % | 5.10 % |
| P/E | 70.5x | 65.0x | 57.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.05x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 11.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Microsoft Corporation alone holds 50% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,661 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.04 % vs industry average 4.79 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 35.7 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 11.6 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.05x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 50.30 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 2.13 | 8.09 | - |
| Confluent Inc | 0.50 | 4.04 | 1.00 |
| Elastic N v | 0.76 | 1.83 | 0.52 |
| Procore Technologies Inc | 0.51 | 1.23 | - |
| Uipath Inc | 0.86 | 2.45 | - |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | 0.47 | 0.93 | 0.78 |
Sign in to see all peers for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | Q4 2025 | +16.0 % | +49.0 % |
| Confluent Inc | Q4 2025 | +20.0 % | - |
| Elastic N v | Q2 2026 | +15.3 % | - |
| Procore Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.1 % | - |
| Uipath Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.5 % | +2,178.3 % |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | Q3 2024 | +28.2 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +16.0 % | +88.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | Q4 2025 | -2.1 % | +80.6 % |
| Confluent Inc | Q4 2025 | +15.9 % | +8.3 % |
| Elastic N v | Q2 2026 | +27.0 % | -10.1 % |
| Procore Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +12.6 % | +15.6 % |
| Uipath Inc | Q2 2026 | +25.9 % | - |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | Q3 2024 | +23.4 % | +34.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 10.06% | 10.95% | 11.00% |
| Confluent Inc | - | - | - |
| Elastic N v | 13.39% | 21.15% | 34.21% |
| Procore Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| Uipath Inc | 12.18% | 16.92% | 18.42% |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 39.05 | 96.09 |
| Confluent Inc | - | 9.14 |
| Elastic N v | 26.54 | 5.10 |
| Procore Technologies Inc | - | 5.27 |
| Uipath Inc | 18.19 | 3.71 |
| Instructure Holdings Inc | - | 5.47 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 202.07 | 21.40 |
Sign in to see all peers for Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.