Sos Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Sos Limited (SOS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Sos Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 154M vs 887M combined for tracked competitors (14.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+827.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-29.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Sos Limited generated 611.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2021, vs 6.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -13.7% net margin compares with -3.8% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Sos Limited accounted for 69.7% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 25.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.69M compares with $0.91M for the peer group (0.8x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SOS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021
Sos Limited reported revenue growth of 611.53 % year on year in Q4 2021, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 6.40 %.
With a net margin of -13.71 %, Sos Limited reported lower profitability than its competitors (-3.77 %).
Sos Limited generated 69.65 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 25.55 % a year earlier.
Sos Limited vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Sos Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Sos Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry grew revenue 293.3% year over year, combined, vs 611.5% for Sos Limited. Sos Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.06% to 0.11%, a gain of 0.05 percentage points.
Sos Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | - | - | - | |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SOS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SOS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SOS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iridium Communications Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sos Limited's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Sos Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Sos Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | 0.18 | 154.29 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 5,242.26 | 887.27 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,242.44 | 1,041.56 |
Sources: Sos Limited's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Sos Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Sos Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Jiutian Speed Rescue Technology Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Overstock.com Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beijing Sense Time Information Technology Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bitfarms Technologies Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hive Blockchain Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| MGT Capital Investments, Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bit-digital.com | Named by the company | 85% |
| DPW Holdings, Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Layer1 Technologies, LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Riot Blockchain, Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beijing Yuanbao Technology Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Blockchain Industries, Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hut 8 Mining Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Northern Data AG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bitcoin Investment Trust | Named by the company | 85% |
| HashChain Technology, Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Marathon Digital Holdings | Named by the company | 85% |
| The9.com | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beijing Yuanshanbao Technology Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Sos Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Sos Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | 0 | 691,883 | -436,520 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 5,242 | 910,019 | 95,656 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,242 | 910,019 | 95,656 |
Sos Limited's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 103 companies in Sos Limited's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Sos Limited ranks #0 of 103 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,294, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Express Company | 207,244 | 31.55 % |
| 2 | Nu Holdings Ltd | 61,219 | 9.32 % |
| 3 | Coinbase Global Inc | 51,945 | 7.91 % |
| 4 | Eason Technology Limited | 38,113 | 5.80 % |
| 5 | Strategy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Synchrony Financial | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Circle Internet Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Sofi Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Sos Limited | 2,997 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Sos Limited's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-05-27.
Sos Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (80 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 1.46 % | 53.42 % (avg) | -52.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | -63.90 % | industry median | -65.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -63.09 % | 2.15 % (avg) | -65.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.02 % | 4.86 % (avg) | -4.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Sos Limited's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -64.46 % | 150.42 % | -33.33 % |
| Operating Margin | -5.21 % | -9.34 % | -63.90 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.57 % | -2.50 % | -11.50 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Sos Limited's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Sos Limited's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Sos Limited is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Sos Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,294 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.02 % vs industry average 4.86 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Sos Limited's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Sos Limited's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Sos Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Sos Limited falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Sos Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+827.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 65.4 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 32.4 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-29.7% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Sos Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | 0.08 | 11.05 | 0.04 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 1.05 | 2.70 | 3.83 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sos Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | Q4 2021 | -33.3 % | - |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.3 % | -55.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -14.7 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sos Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | Q4 2021 | -31.2 % | - |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +5.4 % |
Sos Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | - | - | - |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 3.66% | 3.69% | 20.12% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Sos Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | - | 0.00 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 55.55 | 5.91 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 5.03 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.