Sos Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Sos Limited (SOS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Sos Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 154M vs 907M combined for its competitors (14.5% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+827.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-31.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Sos Limited generated 611.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2021, vs 6.4% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -13.7% net margin compares with -3.8% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Sos Limited accounted for 69.7% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 25.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.69M compares with $0.93M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SOS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021
Sos Limited reported revenue growth of 611.53 % year on year in Q4 2021, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 6.40 %.
With a net margin of -13.71 %, Sos Limited reported lower profitability than its competitors (-3.77 %).
Sos Limited generated 69.65 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 25.55 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Sos Limited vs. its Competitors, Q4 2021
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Sos Limited reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Sos Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Sos Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry grew revenue 354.4% year over year, combined, vs 611.5% for Sos Limited. Sos Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.06% to 0.10%, a gain of 0.03 percentage points.
Sos Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | - | - | - | |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SOS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SOS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SOS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iridium Communications Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sos Limited's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Sos Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Sos Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| 0.18 | 154.29 | |
| 5,023.67 | 906.87 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,023.85 | 1,061.16 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Sos Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Sos Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Sos Limited reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Blockchain Industries, Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hut 8 Mining Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Northern Data AG | Company report | 85% |
| Bitcoin Investment Trust | Company report | 85% |
| HashChain Technology, Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Marathon Digital Holdings | Company report | 85% |
| The9.com | Company report | 85% |
| DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Overstock.com Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Bitfarms Technologies Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Hive Blockchain Technologies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| MGT Capital Investments, Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Bit-digital.com | Company report | 85% |
| DPW Holdings, Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Layer1 Technologies, LLC | Company report | 85% |
| Riot Blockchain, Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Beijing Yuanshanbao Technology Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Jiutian Speed Rescue Technology Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Beijing Yuanbao Technology Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Beijing Sense Time Information Technology Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Sos Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Sos Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | 0 | 691,883 | -436,520 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 5,024 | 930,120 | 167,214 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,024 | 930,120 | 167,214 |
Sos Limited's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 100 companies in Sos Limited's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Sos Limited ranks #0 of 100 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,631, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Express Company | 215,963 | 36.86 % |
| 2 | Nu Holdings Ltd | 58,054 | 9.91 % |
| 3 | Strategy Inc | 40,333 | 6.88 % |
| 4 | Coinbase Global Inc | 34,420 | 5.87 % |
| 5 | Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Synchrony Financial | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Sofi Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Eason Technology Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Circle Internet Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Chime Financial Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Sos Limited | 2,997 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Sos Limited's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-05-27.
Sos Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (127 companies). See the full Miscellaneous Financial Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 1.46 % | 38.70 % (avg) | -37.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -63.90 % | industry median | -75.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -63.09 % | 7.70 % (avg) | -70.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.02 % | 5.01 % (avg) | -5.0 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Sos Limited's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry average (127 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Miscellaneous Financial Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 20.2x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 12.7x | - |
| P/B | 0.0x | 2.7x | -2.7x |
| Return on Equity | -23.01 % | industry aggregate | -32.30 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -11.50 % | -4.10 % (avg) | -7.40 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Sos Limited's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -64.46 % | 150.42 % | -33.33 % |
| Operating Margin | -5.21 % | -9.34 % | -63.90 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.57 % | -2.50 % | -11.50 % |
| P/E | 11.1x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Sos Limited's Strategic Group Map
Sos Limited is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Sos Limited's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -33.3% and operating margin of -63.9% compares with an average of -17.7% growth and -47.6% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Sos Limited sits below that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Sos Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,631 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.02 % vs industry average 5.01 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Sos Limited's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Sos Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Sos Limited falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Sos Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+827.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 75.9 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 32.3 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by American Express Company, holding 36.86 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-31.2% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Sos Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | 0.08 | 11.05 | 0.04 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 0.71 | 1.83 | 3.73 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sos Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | Q4 2021 | -33.3 % | - |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Q3 2026 | +8.6 % | +187.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -12.6 % | -54.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Sos Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | Q4 2021 | -31.2 % | - |
| Iridium Communications Inc | Q3 2026 | +42.4 % | +27.5 % |
Sos Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | - | - | - |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 6.09% | 6.19% | 32.93% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Sos Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Sos Limited | - | 0.00 |
| Iridium Communications Inc | 30.75 | 5.54 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 76.48 | 4.73 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
