Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Smith Douglas Homes's Competitiveness

Name: Smith Douglas Homes Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Smith Douglas Homes (SDHC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026

Competitors Tracked

Publicly traded peers

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

vs 100.00 % a year ago

Revenue Growth Y/Y

21.93 %

Q2 2026

Net Margin

0.65 %

Q2 2026

Key Findings: Smith Douglas Homes vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,001M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+9.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Scale: Smith Douglas Homes ranks #60 of 88 companies by market capitalization in the Construction Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
Peer revenue share: Smith Douglas Homes accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SDHC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Smith Douglas Homes generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SDHC/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SDHC/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SDHC/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

AI Integration via MCP

Connect Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant directly to this data.

For context: the Construction Services industry grew revenue 20.1% year over year, combined, vs 21.9% for Smith Douglas Homes. Smith Douglas Homes's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.18% to 0.18%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Smith Douglas Homes's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
Smith Douglas Homes Corp	Yes	No	No	Yes
Similar-Size Competitors (8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

SDHC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SDHC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Smith Douglas Homes's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.

Similar-Size
(1 of 7)

Entity	TTM Share Price Return (group: median)	vs U.S.A. 500
Smith Douglas Homes Corp	-43.70 %	Underperformed
Competitors combined (0)	40.4%	63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (7)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0)	40.4%	63.2%

Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Smith Douglas Homes's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Unlock Commercial Access

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SDHC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

SDHC Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Smith Douglas Homes's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the homebuilding market, offering affordable luxury homes with various floor plans and personalized options. It emphasizes operational efficiency, a land-light business model, and maintains a conservative balance sheet to achieve strong margins and cash flow. The company targets cost-effectiveness within its submarkets, setting price points below FHA limits. It competes with other homebuilders for construction managers, trade partners, and raw materials. The company utilizes technology, including SMART Builder, a customized ERP system, to manage construction and homebuyer relationships in real time, improving efficiency and scheduling.

Smith Douglas Homes's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).

Company	Largest Segment	2nd Segment	3rd Segment
Smith Douglas Homes Corp	Southeast 58.93 %	Central 41.55 %	-

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).