Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Constellium Se's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Constellium Se (CSTM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q1 2026
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q1 2026
Net Margin
7.96 %
Q1 2026

Key Findings: Constellium Se vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8,107M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+21.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Constellium Se ranks #21 of 58 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry, holding 0.6% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Constellium Se accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CSTM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026

Constellium Se generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CSTM/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CSTM/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CSTM/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Constellium Se's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Constellium Se - - - No
High-Confidence Competitors (7) 71% 57% 57% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 90% 80% 80% 40%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2026

100%market share
  • Constellium Se100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Constellium Se and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Constellium Se's full market share breakdown »

CSTM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CSTM Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Constellium Se's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(2 of 4)
60%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(6 of 10)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Constellium Se 63.20 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Constellium Se's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

CSTM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

CSTM High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 7) Percent change over the selected range

CSTM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

CSTM Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Constellium Se's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The global aluminum rolled and extruded industry is characterized by intense competition. Key factors influencing competition include product quality, pricing, delivery timeliness, customer service, geographic reach, and product innovation. Aluminum competes with materials such as steel, glass, plastics, and composites across various applications. The company faces competition from both U.S. and international firms throughout the aluminum supply chain. Customer demand in the aluminum industry is seasonal and affected by holiday periods, weather conditions, economic factors, and fluctuations in customers' industries.

Constellium Se's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Otto Fuchs KG Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Universal Alloy Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Commonwealth Rolled Products, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Norsk Hydro ASA Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Tri-Arrows Aluminum Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Arconic Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Magna International Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sankyo Tateyama, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ardagh Metal Packaging S a Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Gestamp Automoción, S.A. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Novelis Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
UACJ Automotive Whitehall Industries, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Benteler International AG Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Metra Aluminum Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Speira GmbH Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
AMAG Austria Metall AG Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Constellium Se's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.