Bunge Global Sa's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bunge Global Sa (BG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Bunge Global Sa vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 80,547M vs 126,360M combined for tracked competitors (38.9% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+8.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-3.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Bunge Global Sa generated 87.8% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 3.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 0.3% net margin compares with 1.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Bunge Global Sa ranks #3 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Agricultural Production industry, holding 13.8% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Bunge Global Sa accounted for 41.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 28.3% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $2.37M compares with $2.05M for the peer group (1.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Bunge Global Sa reported revenue growth of 87.76 % year on year in Q1 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 3.08 %.
With a net margin of 0.34 %, Bunge Global Sa reported lower profitability than its competitors (0.95 %).
Bunge Global Sa generated 41.82 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 28.30 % a year earlier.
Bunge Global Sa vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Bunge Global Sa and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Bunge Global Sa's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs 87.8% for Bunge Global Sa. Bunge Global Sa's share of combined industry revenue moved from 11.89% to 19.12%, a gain of 7.23 percentage points.
Bunge Global Sa's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
BG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
BG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Cresud Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Archer daniels midland Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Chs Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Sadot Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Bunge Global Sa's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Bunge Global Sa's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Bunge Global Sa
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 21,346.72 | 80,547.00 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,984.30 | 82,099.00 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 9,732.39 | 6,548.66 |
| Cresud Inc | 713.41 | 23,864.07 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 77.45 | 58.73 |
| Sadot Group Inc | 5.90 | 246.57 |
| SUBTOTAL | 70,860.17 | 232,009.36 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Bunge Global Sa.
Sources: Bunge Global Sa's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Bunge Global Sa versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Bunge Global Sa's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Archer Daniels Midland Co. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Louis Dreyfus Company B.V. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Adecoagro S a | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fuji Oil Co. Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wilmar International Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cargill Incorporated | Named by the company | 85% |
| Louis Dreyfus Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| AAK AB | Named by the company | 85% |
| Glencore | Named by the company | 85% |
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | Named by the company | 85% |
| COFCO International | Named by the company | 85% |
| Varthomio | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Bunge Global Sa's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Bunge Global Sa's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Soybean Processing and Refining 60.69 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Ag Services and Oilseeds 76.86 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Feed Ingredients 66.67 % |
| Chs Inc | Grains 48.90 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Bunge Global Sa's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 21,347 | 2,369,029 | 21,000 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,984 | 1,978,480 | 42,872 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 9,732 | 436,578 | 40,417 |
| Cresud Inc | 713 | 8,260,321 | 2,027,371 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 77 | 58,734,000 | 5,871,000 |
| Sadot Group Inc | 6 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 49,513 | 2,051,029 | 111,282 |
Bunge Global Sa's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Darling Ingredients Inc | North America 58.21 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Bunge Global Sa's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 39 companies in Bunge Global Sa's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Bunge Global Sa ranks #3 of 39 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 13.76 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,571, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archer daniels midland Co | 39,540 | 25.42 % |
| 2 | Nutrien Ltd | 35,003 | 22.51 % |
| 3 | Bunge Global Sa | 21,394 | 13.76 % |
| 4 | Cf Industries Holdings inc | 18,057 | 11.61 % |
| 5 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Mosaic Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Icl Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Seaboard Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Scotts Miracle gro Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Andersons Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Bunge Global Sa's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Bunge Global Sa's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archer daniels midland Co | 39,540 | 33.49 % |
| 2 | Nutrien Ltd | 35,003 | 23.72 % |
| 3 | Bunge Global Sa | 21,394 | 37.67 % |
| 4 | Cf Industries Holdings inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Mosaic Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Icl Group Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Seaboard Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Bunge Global Sa's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Bunge Global Sa's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Agricultural Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (58 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 4.44 % | 21.12 % (avg) | -16.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | 1.63 % | industry median | -0.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 2.45 % | 2.16 % (avg) | +0.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.17 % | 4.73 % (avg) | -2.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Bunge Global Sa's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Agricultural Production industry average (58 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 28.0x | 20.8x | +7.2x |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.9x | 9.8x | +8.0x |
| P/B | 1.5x | 1.7x | -0.2x |
| Return on Equity | 4.47 % | industry aggregate | -1.76 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.07 % | 1.23 % (avg) | 1.84 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Bunge Global Sa's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -10.13 % | -23.98 % | 7.30 % | -0.11 % | -10.06 % | -11.44 % | -10.80 % | 32.43 % |
| Operating Margin | 1.63 % | 2.97 % | 0.72 % | 1.79 % | -2.23 % | 5.26 % | 3.04 % | 1.84 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.87 % | 7.15 % | 1.61 % | 4.00 % | -4.96 % | 11.51 % | 5.84 % | 3.39 % |
| P/E | 27.4x | 13.0x | 79.7x | 36.2x | - | 6.8x | 10.4x | 17.7x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Bunge Global Sa's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Bunge Global Sa's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Bunge Global Sa is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Bunge Global Sa's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Bunge Global Sa's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Bunge Global Sa falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.54x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 4.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Bunge Global Sa's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,571 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.17 % vs industry average 4.73 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Bunge Global Sa's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Bunge Global Sa's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Bunge Global Sa's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Bunge Global Sa falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Bunge Global Sa's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+8.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-3.7% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Bunge Global Sa's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 0.17 | 1.70 | 0.87 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 0.47 | 1.36 | 0.36 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 0.13 | 1.54 | 1.01 |
| Cresud Inc | 0.25 | 1.24 | 253.18 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 1.02 | 5.30 | - |
| Sadot Group Inc | 0.01 | 0.29 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bunge Global Sa's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Q1 2026 | +87.8 % | -63.2 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +320.3 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.4 % | +2,628.8 % |
| Cresud Inc | Q2 2025 | +28.5 % | +138.7 % |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | Q2 2026 | -8.4 % | -1.0 % |
| Sadot Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +13,912.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +28.5 % | +135.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bunge Global Sa's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Q1 2026 | +91.0 % | +8.4 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | -10.8 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.5 % | - |
| Cresud Inc | Q2 2025 | +31.8 % | -41.7 % |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | Q2 2026 | -8.4 % | - |
| Sadot Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
Bunge Global Sa's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 1.68% | 2.67% | 4.47% |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 3.33% | 5.61% | 7.77% |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 5.72% | 5.72% | 12.23% |
| Cresud Inc | 0.12% | 0.14% | 183.68% |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 30.77% | 32.42% | 21.68% |
| Sadot Group Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Bunge Global Sa's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 24.96 | 0.27 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 22.03 | 0.47 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 16.29 | 1.49 |
| Cresud Inc | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 13.16 | 1.32 |
| Sadot Group Inc | - | 0.02 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 7.93 | 0.31 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.