Adaptive Biotechnologies's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Adaptive Biotechnologies vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 308M vs 9,954M combined for tracked competitors (3.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-7.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+6.4%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Adaptive Biotechnologies generated 21.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 19.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -55.8% net margin compares with -2.2% for the peer group.
- Scale: Adaptive Biotechnologies ranks #25 of 165 companies by market capitalization in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals industry, holding 0.5% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Adaptive Biotechnologies accounted for 2.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 2.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.49M compares with $0.70M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ADPT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Adaptive Biotechnologies reported revenue growth of 21.53 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 18.98 %.
With a net margin of -55.82 %, Adaptive Biotechnologies reported lower profitability than its competitors (-2.21 %).
Adaptive Biotechnologies generated 2.63 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 2.58 % a year earlier.
Adaptive Biotechnologies vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Adaptive Biotechnologies and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Adaptive Biotechnologies's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals industry grew revenue 20.7% year over year, combined, vs 21.5% for Adaptive Biotechnologies. Adaptive Biotechnologies's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.16% to 0.16%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (11) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ADPT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ADPT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
ADPT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
ADPT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guardant Health Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Illumina Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Natera Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Veracyte Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Adaptive Biotechnologies's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | 4,557.47 | 308.08 |
| Natera Inc | 58,997.99 | 2,707.08 |
| Illumina Inc | 41,600.70 | 4,493.00 |
| Guardant Health Inc | 23,561.31 | 1,183.11 |
| Veracyte Inc | 3,711.55 | 544.74 |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | 531.22 | 159.32 |
| SUBTOTAL | 133,651.78 | 10,297.62 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
Sources: Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Biodesix Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Personalis Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Grail Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Caris Life Sciences Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Virax Biolabs Group Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
| Atreca inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Immunome Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Evotec Se | Named by the company | 85% |
| Genedx Holdings Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Veracyte Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Adaptive Biotechnologies's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | Mrd Business Segment 92.47 % |
| Natera Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Illumina Inc | Sequencing 90.94 % |
| Guardant Health Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Veracyte Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Celularity Inc | Degenerative Disease 65.20 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | 4,557 | 493,720 | -102,548 |
| Natera Inc | 58,998 | 440,892 | -31,327 |
| Illumina Inc | 41,601 | 3,510,156 | 644,531 |
| Guardant Health Inc | 23,561 | 472,109 | -180,940 |
| Veracyte Inc | 3,712 | 721,503 | 151,633 |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | 531 | 328,485 | -270,901 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 129,094 | 696,426 | -23,251 |
Sign in to see all peers for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Natera Inc | United States 98.24 % |
| Illumina Inc | United States and Canada 56.34 % |
| Guardant Health Inc | United States 94.35 % |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | Americas 45.29 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 159 companies in Adaptive Biotechnologies's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Adaptive Biotechnologies ranks #25 of 159 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.53 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,331, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amgen Inc | 226,707 | 26.02 % |
| 2 | Gilead Sciences Inc | 185,928 | 21.34 % |
| 3 | Moderna Inc | 76,517 | 8.78 % |
| 4 | Argenx Se | 63,326 | 7.27 % |
| 5 | Revolution Medicines Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Biogen Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Biontech Se | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Exelixis Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Neurocrine Biosciences Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Halozyme Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 25 | Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | 4,652 | 0.53 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Adaptive Biotechnologies's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Cg Oncology Inc | 5,846 | 79.62 % |
| 21 | Crispr Therapeutics Ag | 5,132 | -11.85 % |
| 22 | Dbv Technologies S a | 5,020 | 30.26 % |
| 23 | Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | 4,918 | 440.84 % |
| 24 | Kodiak Sciences Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 25 | Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | 4,652 | 121.63 % |
| 26 | Denali Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 27 | Relay Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 28 | Tarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 29 | Beam Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 30 | Biocryst Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Adaptive Biotechnologies's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (93 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.57 % | 68.46 % (avg) | +7.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -12.16 % | industry median | +192.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -6.92 % | -0.94 % (avg) | -6.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.98 % | 6.74 % (avg) | -5.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals industry average (93 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 26.7x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 21.3x | - |
| P/B | 14.4x | 5.1x | +9.3x |
| Return on Equity | -31.83 % | industry aggregate | -28.40 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -5.65 % | -6.17 % (avg) | 0.52 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | 15.65 % | 56.88 % | 20.06 % | -8.11 % | 5.10 % | 54.77 % |
| Operating Margin | -92.15 % | -155.33 % | -135.39 % | -108.03 % | -133.33 % | -90.83 % | -20.62 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -7.38 % | -9.14 % | -12.46 % | -15.18 % | -21.36 % | -21.45 % | -9.11 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Adaptive Biotechnologies's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Adaptive Biotechnologies is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Adaptive Biotechnologies's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Adaptive Biotechnologies falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,331 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.98 % vs industry average 6.74 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Adaptive Biotechnologies's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Adaptive Biotechnologies's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Adaptive Biotechnologies falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 192.8 points above the industry median.
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 28.4 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-7.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.0% median pace.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | 1.07 | 3.72 | 0.49 |
| Natera Inc | - | 3.14 | 0.05 |
| Illumina Inc | - | 1.74 | 0.75 |
| Guardant Health Inc | 2.56 | 4.29 | - |
| Veracyte Inc | 4.95 | 8.11 | - |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | 0.88 | 5.47 | 243.48 |
Sign in to see all peers for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | Q2 2026 | +21.5 % | - |
| Natera Inc | Q2 2026 | +37.7 % | - |
| Illumina Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.4 % | -11.9 % |
| Guardant Health Inc | Q2 2026 | +44.3 % | - |
| Veracyte Inc | Q2 2026 | +23.4 % | - |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | Q2 2026 | -1.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +18.2 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | Q2 2026 | +12.0 % | +80.8 % |
| Natera Inc | Q2 2026 | -99.3 % | +144.9 % |
| Illumina Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.9 % | +33.3 % |
| Guardant Health Inc | Q2 2026 | +42.8 % | +108.2 % |
| Veracyte Inc | Q2 2026 | -91.4 % | +122.3 % |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.5 % | +182.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | - | - | - |
| Natera Inc | - | - | - |
| Illumina Inc | 12.68% | 19.61% | 31.08% |
| Guardant Health Inc | - | - | - |
| Veracyte Inc | 8.04% | 8.15% | 8.64% |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Adaptive Biotechnologies's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | - | 14.79 |
| Natera Inc | - | 21.79 |
| Illumina Inc | 50.92 | 9.26 |
| Guardant Health Inc | - | 19.91 |
| Veracyte Inc | 32.08 | 6.81 |
| Pacific Biosciences Of California Inc | - | 3.33 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 12.98 |
Sign in to see all peers for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.