Wns Holdings Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Wns Holdings Limited (WNS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Wns Holdings Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,346M vs 116,300M combined for its competitors (1.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+5.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-3.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Wns Holdings Limited generated 9.5% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2025, vs 6.6% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.2% net margin compares with 11.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Wns Holdings Limited accounted for 1.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.03M compares with $0.08M for the peer group (0.4x).
- Structure: Wns Holdings Limited operates in the following segments: BFSI, TSLU, MRHP, HCLS.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
WNS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Wns Holdings Limited reported revenue growth of 9.49 % year on year in Q1 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 6.63 %.
With a net margin of 6.15 %, Wns Holdings Limited reported lower profitability than its competitors (11.02 %).
Wns Holdings Limited generated 1.25 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.21 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Wns Holdings Limited vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Wns Holdings Limited reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Wns Holdings Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Wns Holdings Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 7.1% year over year, combined, vs 9.5% for Wns Holdings Limited. Wns Holdings Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.06% to 0.06%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Wns Holdings Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (7) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
WNS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
WNS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
WNS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genpact Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Accenture Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Dxc Technology Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Gentex Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Wns Holdings Limited's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Wns Holdings Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Wns holdings Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Wns holdings Limited |
3,459.83 | 1,345.62 |
 Accenture Plc |
153,966.03 | 74,183.45 |
 Infosys Limited |
51,048.14 | 20,158.00 |
 Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation |
28,620.00 | 21,891.00 |
 Genpact Limited |
7,251.62 | 5,250.06 |
 Gentex Corporation |
3,994.29 | 2,618.15 |
| SUBTOTAL | 250,807.72 | 138,601.96 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Wns holdings Limited.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Wns holdings Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Wns Holdings Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Wns Holdings Limited reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Genpact | Company report | 85% |
| TCS | Company report | 85% |
| Deloitte | Company report | 85% |
| InterGlobe | Company report | 85% |
| Capgemini | Company report | 85% |
| IBM | Company report | 85% |
| Wipro | Company report | 85% |
| Accelya | Company report | 85% |
| EXL | Company report | 85% |
| Mu Sigma | Company report | 85% |
| Cognizant | Company report | 85% |
| Infosys | Company report | 85% |
| Accenture | Company report | 85% |
| Concentrix Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Telus International cda Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Dxc Technology Co | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Wns Holdings Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Wns Holdings Limited's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | BFSI 41.52 % |
| Accenture Plc | Americas 49.30 % |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | Financial services 31.20 % |
| Genpact Limited | High Tech and Manufacturing 39.09 % |
| Gentex Corporation | Automotive Products 85.30 % |
| Dxc Technology Co | GIS 47.03 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
Wns Holdings Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | 3,460 | 30,947 | 3,747 |
| Accenture Plc | 153,966 | 91,134 | 10,284 |
| Infosys Limited | 51,048 | 77,645 | 12,773 |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 28,620 | 62,261 | 7,318 |
| Genpact Limited | 7,252 | 37,500 | 4,162 |
| Gentex Corporation | 3,994 | 409,214 | 61,963 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 247,348 | 81,173 | 9,025 |
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
Wns Holdings Limited's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | North America 46.79 % |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | North America 75.18 % |
| Dxc Technology Co | Other Europe 32.79 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Wns Holdings Limited's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 152 companies in Wns Holdings Limited's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Wns Holdings Limited ranks #0 of 152 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,105, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Visa Inc | 808,859 | 23.67 % |
| 2 | Mastercard Incorporated | 579,080 | 16.95 % |
| 3 | Repay Holdings Corporation | 373,951 | 10.94 % |
| 4 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 244,587 | 7.16 % |
| 5 | Accenture Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Uber Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Pdd Holdings inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Doordash Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Orix Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Mercadolibre Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Wns holdings Limited | 3,460 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Wns Holdings Limited's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-10-16.
Wns Holdings Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Professional Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (291 companies). See the full Professional Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.35 % | 33.54 % (avg) | -33.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 0.16 % | industry median | -5.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.23 % | 6.05 % (avg) | -5.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.33 % | 4.35 % (avg) | 0.0 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Wns Holdings Limited's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Professional Services industry average (291 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Professional Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 16.7x | 25.3x | -8.6x |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.1x | 14.1x | -3.9x |
| P/B | 3.5x | 3.5x | 0.0x |
| Return on Equity | 0.21 % | industry aggregate | -29.08 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.21 % | 1.03 % (avg) | -0.83 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Wns Holdings Limited's Strategic Group Map
Wns Holdings Limited is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Wns Holdings Limited's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 1.9% and operating margin of 0.2% compares with an average of 2.4% growth and 0.4% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Wns Holdings Limited sits below that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Wns Holdings Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,105 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.33 % vs industry average 4.35 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Wns Holdings Limited's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Wns Holdings Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Wns Holdings Limited falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Wns Holdings Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+5.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 5.4 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 29.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-3.5% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Wns Holdings Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | 0.33 | 1.65 | 0.34 |
| Accenture Plc | 0.51 | 1.38 | 0.20 |
| Infosys Limited | 0.42 | 1.98 | 0.03 |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 0.42 | 2.19 | 0.07 |
| Genpact Limited | 0.48 | 1.69 | 0.54 |
| Gentex Corporation | 0.41 | 2.89 | 0.00 |
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Wns Holdings Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | Q2 2025 | +9.5 % | -24.8 % |
| Accenture Plc | Q3 2026 | +6.2 % | +40.7 % |
| Infosys Limited | Q1 2026 | +4.6 % | +4.9 % |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | Q3 2026 | +4.6 % | +128.8 % |
| Genpact Limited | Q2 2026 | +7.1 % | +9.8 % |
| Gentex Corporation | Q3 2026 | -1.1 % | -10.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +4.5 % | +20.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Wns Holdings Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | Q2 2025 | +13.3 % | +38.3 % |
| Accenture Plc | Q3 2026 | +5.9 % | +131.9 % |
| Infosys Limited | Q1 2026 | +4.4 % | - |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | Q3 2026 | +4.7 % | +17.9 % |
| Genpact Limited | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | -8.6 % |
| Gentex Corporation | Q3 2026 | +0.3 % | -43.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
Wns Holdings Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | 10.91% | 13.50% | 20.78% |
| Accenture Plc | 12.18% | 18.35% | 25.70% |
| Infosys Limited | 20.16% | 30.31% | 33.70% |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 12.35% | 14.55% | 17.36% |
| Genpact Limited | 10.48% | 13.86% | 22.91% |
| Gentex Corporation | 13.36% | 15.51% | 15.84% |
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Wns Holdings Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Wns holdings Limited | 21.35 | 2.57 |
| Accenture Plc | 18.76 | 2.08 |
| Infosys Limited | 16.30 | 2.53 |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 11.63 | 1.31 |
| Genpact Limited | 12.66 | 1.38 |
| Gentex Corporation | 10.54 | 1.53 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 16.26 | 1.81 |
Sign in to see all peers for Wns holdings Limited.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.