Wabash National's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Wabash National (WNC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Wabash National vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,464M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-17.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Wabash National ranks #14 of 20 companies by market capitalization in the Construction & Mining Machinery industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Wabash National accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
WNC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Wabash National generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Construction & Mining Machinery industry grew revenue 6.1% year over year, combined, vs -20.4% for Wabash National. Wabash National's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.70% to 0.53%, a loss of 0.18 percentage points.
Wabash National's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wabash National Corporation | No | No | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | - | |||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
WNC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
WNC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
WNC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
WNC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Wabash National's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Wabash National's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Inseego Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| J.B. Hunt Transport Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Wabash National's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Wabash National's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Wabash National Corporation | Transportation Solutions 87.31 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).