Ringcentral Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ringcentral Inc (RNG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ringcentral Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,585M vs 1,481,198M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+5.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ringcentral Inc generated 6.1% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 12.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.0% net margin compares with 47.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Ringcentral Inc ranks #24 of 165 companies by market capitalization in the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry, holding 1.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Ringcentral Inc accounted for 0.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.35M compares with $1.46M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RNG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Ringcentral Inc reported revenue growth of 6.06 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.64 %.
With a net margin of 5.95 %, Ringcentral Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (47.81 %).
Ringcentral Inc generated 0.17 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.18 % a year earlier.
Ringcentral Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ringcentral Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ringcentral Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 1.3% year over year, combined, vs 6.1% for Ringcentral Inc. Ringcentral Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.45% to 0.47%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Ringcentral Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (26) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (14) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 14.30 % (1 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RNG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RNG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
RNG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
RNG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twilio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Cisco Systems Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | On24 Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Five9 Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Vimeo Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ringcentral Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Ringcentral Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | 6,594.30 | 2,584.64 |
| Alphabet Inc | 4,174,720.44 | 445,866.00 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,795,216.66 | 331,839.00 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1,836,280.92 | 228,248.00 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 425,572.38 | 63,325.00 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830.00 | 73,266.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 11,229,640.41 | 1,504,753.83 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Ringcentral Inc .
Sources: Ringcentral Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ringcentral Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ringcentral Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Communications Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| On24 Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ooma Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Crexendo Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| LiveVox Holdings | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oracle Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Twilio Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Slack Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cisco Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alphabet Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Microsoft Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Comcast Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| NEC Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zoom Video Communications | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vodafone Group plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Siemens Enterprise Networks | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vonage Holdings Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Telus Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Five9 Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Egain Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Avaya Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alphabet Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nice Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Salesforce Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Venture Global Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| 8x8 Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Liveperson Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Logmein Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ringcentral Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Ringcentral Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Google Services 85.60 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Family of Apps 99.29 % |
| Cisco Systems Inc | Americas 60.41 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Ringcentral Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | 6,594 | 350,316 | 14,944 |
| Alphabet Inc | 4,174,720 | 9,645,768 | 5,283,078 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,795,217 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1,836,281 | 2,894,161 | 863,476 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 425,572 | 768,507 | 161,007 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 11,223,046 | 1,459,251 | 509,781 |
Ringcentral Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | United States 47.77 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | US & Canada 37.77 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| Salesforce Inc | Americas 64.97 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Ringcentral Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 148 companies in Ringcentral Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ringcentral Inc ranks #24 of 148 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.03 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 546, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automatic Data Processing Inc | 105,523 | 16.92 % |
| 2 | Workday Inc | 45,532 | 7.30 % |
| 3 | Infosys Limited | 43,117 | 6.91 % |
| 4 | Zscaler Inc | 31,483 | 5.05 % |
| 5 | Reddit Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Verisign Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Verisk Analytics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Toast Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Wipro Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 24 | Ringcentral Inc | 6,394 | 1.03 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ringcentral Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Ringcentral Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Hinge Health Inc | 7,751 | 81.29 % |
| 20 | Compass Inc | 7,636 | 14.03 % |
| 21 | Applied Digital Corporation | 7,078 | 13.86 % |
| 22 | Bilibili Inc | 6,658 | -44.35 % |
| 23 | D wave Quantum Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 24 | Ringcentral Inc | 6,394 | 144.28 % |
| 25 | Amdocs Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 26 | Science applications International corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 27 | Rigetti Computing Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 28 | Pegasystems Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 29 | Epam Systems Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ringcentral Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Ringcentral Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (203 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.81 % | 51.85 % (avg) | +20.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 6.72 % | industry median | +7.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 24.23 % | 2.97 % (avg) | +21.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.65 % | 5.21 % (avg) | -1.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ringcentral Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry average (203 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 34.1x | 27.6x | +6.4x |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.6x | 16.4x | -8.8x |
| P/B | -6.2x | 4.0x | -10.2x |
| Return on Equity | -18.84 % | industry aggregate | -29.58 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 128.90 % | 1.95 % (avg) | 126.95 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Ringcentral Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 34.31 % | 34.03 % | 31.10 % | 34.73 % | 24.68 % | 10.75 % | 8.98 % | 4.79 % |
| Operating Margin | -2.44 % | -5.06 % | -9.57 % | -18.92 % | -32.66 % | -9.03 % | 0.11 % | 4.79 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -1.71 % | -3.47 % | -5.46 % | -16.81 % | -41.43 % | -21.03 % | 0.50 % | 175.01 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 60.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ringcentral Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Ringcentral Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Ringcentral Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Ringcentral Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Ringcentral Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Ringcentral Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.06x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Ringcentral Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 546 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.65 % vs industry average 5.21 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ringcentral Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ringcentral Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ringcentral Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ringcentral Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ringcentral Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 7.7 points above the industry median.
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 29.6 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.06x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (30.80 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ringcentral Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | 0.14 | 0.80 | - |
| Alphabet Inc | 0.55 | 2.13 | 0.13 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 0.47 | 2.29 | 0.25 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.25 | 0.94 | 0.63 |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ringcentral Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | +196.5 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Q2 2026 | +24.2 % | +297.9 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Q2 2026 | +28.0 % | -13.6 % |
| Cisco Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.6 % | +51.3 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +16.8 % | +89.6 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ringcentral Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | Q2 2026 | +3.8 % | +14.0 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +100.1 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Q2 2026 | +33.4 % | +82.1 % |
| Cisco Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +14.8 % | +79.7 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
Ringcentral Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | 7.59% | 15.31% | - |
| Alphabet Inc | 35.42% | 42.01% | 50.84% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 17.98% | 20.69% | 29.73% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 10.64% | 11.94% | 27.52% |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ringcentral Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ringcentral Inc | 61.40 | 2.55 |
| Alphabet Inc | 17.03 | 9.36 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 28.37 | 11.44 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 26.98 | 8.05 |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 31.96 | 6.72 |
| Oracle Corporation | 20.79 | 5.43 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.39 | 7.46 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.