Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Th International Limited's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Th International Limited (THCH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-33.11 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Th International Limited vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 195M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Th International Limited ranks #43 of 56 companies by market capitalization in the Restaurants industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Th International Limited accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

THCH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Th International Limited generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/THCH/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/THCH/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/THCH/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Th International Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Th International Limited No Yes No No
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 100% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 33% 33% 22% 20%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Th International Limited100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Th International Limited and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Th International Limited's full market share breakdown »

THCH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

THCH Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Th International Limited's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
30%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(3 of 10)
60%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Th International Limited -53.20 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Th International Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

THCH Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

THCH High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

THCH Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

THCH Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

THCH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

THCH Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Th International Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive environment characterized by intense competition for retail premises in China. Some competitors possess size advantages and greater financial resources, allowing them to negotiate more favorable lease terms and obtain priority or exclusivity from landlords and developers for prime locations. This competition may hinder the company's ability to secure store locations on reasonable terms, affecting its business growth strategies. Additionally, food safety issues experienced by competitors' restaurants can negatively impact industry sales through adverse publicity. The company faces risks from competitors offering more attractive products, pricing, discounts, or superior customer service, which could lead to reduced sales. Protecting intellectual property rights presents challenges, including potential infringement and litigation risks that may weaken the company's competitive position and harm the brand image of Tim Hortons. The franchise business model relies on independent sub-franchisees, whose performance influences overall results but remains beyond the company's direct control.

Th International Limited's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Tim Hortons Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Th International Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.