Friendable Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Friendable Inc (FDBL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Friendable Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 775,447M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-47.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Friendable Inc generated 2,522.4% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2022, vs 3.2% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -2,804.3% net margin compares with 17.3% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Friendable Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.05M compares with $4.29M for the peer group (0.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
FDBL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2022
Friendable Inc reported revenue growth of 2,522.35 % year on year in Q3 2022, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 3.24 %.
With a net margin of -2,804.29 %, Friendable Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.26 %).
Friendable Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Friendable Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Friendable Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Friendable Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Friendable Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.7% year over year, combined, vs 2,522.4% for Friendable Inc. Friendable Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Friendable Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | - | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (19) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
FDBL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Playstudios Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Digital Turbine Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Vimeo Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Meta Platforms Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Gigamedia Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Friendable Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Friendable Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Friendable Inc |
0.48 | 0.16 |
 Alphabet Inc |
3,652,888.80 | 471,097.00 |
 Meta Platforms Inc |
1,604,548.53 | 241,607.00 |
 Applovin Corporation |
132,682.36 | 6,829.12 |
 Netease Inc |
78,928.94 | 15,670.59 |
 Roblox Corporation |
36,813.43 | 5,851.70 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,533,560.12 | 775,447.20 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Friendable Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Friendable Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Friendable Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | Google Services 75.49 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Family of Apps 99.31 % |
| Applovin Corporation | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Snap Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Iac Inc | People Inc. 95.14 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Friendable Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | 0 | 54,525 | -1,259,298 |
| Alphabet Inc | 3,652,889 | 10,191,610 | 5,098,953 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1,604,549 | 3,063,552 | 954,149 |
| Applovin Corporation | 132,682 | 7,604,815 | 4,910,860 |
| Netease Inc | 78,929 | 1,741,176,143 | 552,890,667 |
| Roblox Corporation | 36,813 | 1,909,200 | -319,121 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,533,560 | 4,292,324 | 1,769,977 |
Friendable Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | United States 53.05 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | US & Canada 40.58 % |
| Applovin Corporation | United States 50.26 % |
| Pinterest Inc | United States and Canada 73.42 % |
| Snap Inc | North America 56.82 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Friendable Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 230 companies in Friendable Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Friendable Inc ranks #0 of 230 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,725, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,900,751 | 51.08 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 439,234 | 5.75 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 366,232 | 4.80 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 304,075 | 3.98 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Friendable Inc | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Friendable Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-04-09.
Friendable Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (442 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 51.01 % (avg) | -51.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 1.99 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 5.20 % (avg) | -5.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Friendable Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (442 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 41.7x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 20.5x | - |
| P/B | -0.2x | 5.6x | -5.7x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -3.14 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Friendable Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -80.90 % | -69.90 % | - | - | 65.59 % | -98.35 % |
| Operating Margin | -2,090.11 % | -18,886.95 % | -62,838.53 % | -49,870.82 % | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Friendable Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,725 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 5.20 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Friendable Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Friendable Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.2% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 51.08 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-47.6% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Friendable Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | 0.02 | 0.02 | - |
| Alphabet Inc | 0.63 | 2.40 | 0.16 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 0.42 | 2.23 | 0.29 |
| Applovin Corporation | 1.93 | 3.52 | 1.54 |
| Netease Inc | 0.90 | 3.45 | 0.04 |
| Roblox Corporation | 0.20 | 0.86 | 4.54 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Friendable Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | Q3 2022 | +2,522.3 % | - |
| Alphabet Inc | Q3 2026 | +24.7 % | -24.3 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Q3 2026 | +26.1 % | +264.0 % |
| Applovin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +52.8 % | +54.6 % |
| Netease Inc | Q4 2025 | +7.1 % | +20.0 % |
| Roblox Corporation | Q3 2026 | +15.6 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +20.7 % | -6.5 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Friendable Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | Q3 2022 | - | - |
| Alphabet Inc | Q3 2026 | +24.3 % | +114.4 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Q3 2026 | +45.2 % | +80.3 % |
| Applovin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +45.6 % | - |
| Netease Inc | Q4 2025 | +6.3 % | +10.7 % |
| Roblox Corporation | Q3 2026 | +7.3 % | -70.1 % |
Friendable Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | - | - | - |
| Alphabet Inc | 29.24% | 34.26% | 42.62% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 17.81% | 20.54% | 30.27% |
| Applovin Corporation | 59.64% | 72.22% | 193.10% |
| Netease Inc | 15.72% | 20.25% | 21.71% |
| Roblox Corporation | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Friendable Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Friendable Inc | - | 2.92 |
| Alphabet Inc | 15.41 | 7.75 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 21.28 | 6.64 |
| Applovin Corporation | 30.31 | 19.43 |
| Netease Inc | 117.51 | 5.04 |
| Roblox Corporation | - | 6.29 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 17.31 | 7.14 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.