Silicon Laboratories Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Silicon Laboratories Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 856M vs 190,615M combined for its competitors (0.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+6.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+14.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Silicon Laboratories Inc generated 18.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 41.3% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -4.6% net margin compares with 33.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Silicon Laboratories Inc ranks #35 of 115 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Silicon Laboratories Inc accounted for 0.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.44M compares with $0.88M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SLAB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Silicon Laboratories Inc reported revenue growth of 18.78 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 41.32 %.
With a net margin of -4.64 %, Silicon Laboratories Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (33.62 %).
Silicon Laboratories Inc generated 0.42 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.50 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Silicon Laboratories Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Silicon Laboratories Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Silicon Laboratories Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Silicon Laboratories Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 48.1% year over year, combined, vs 18.8% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. Silicon Laboratories Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.05% to 0.04%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (27) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (14) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SLAB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SLAB Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SLAB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maxlinear Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Silicom Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Lattice Semiconductor Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Synaptics Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Silicon Laboratories Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Silicon Laboratories Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Silicon Laboratories Inc |
7,355.13 | 856.28 |
 Broadcom Inc |
1,435,263.03 | 89,104.00 |
 Texas Instruments Incorporated |
255,448.56 | 20,766.00 |
 Analog Devices Inc |
178,310.91 | 12,740.34 |
 Qualcomm Inc |
176,823.29 | 44,069.00 |
 Marvell Technology Inc |
126,133.96 | 8,715.90 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,451,098.85 | 218,715.57 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Silicon Laboratories Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Silicon Laboratories Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm | Company report | 85% |
| Texas Instruments | Company report | 85% |
| Synaptics | Company report | 85% |
| Broadcom | Company report | 85% |
| Maxlinear Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Telink | Company report | 85% |
| Espressif | Company report | 85% |
| Nordic Semiconductor | Company report | 85% |
| STMicroelectronics | Company report | 85% |
| MediaTek | Company report | 85% |
| Infineon | Company report | 85% |
| NXP | Company report | 85% |
| Microchip | Company report | 85% |
| Renesas | Company report | 85% |
| Broadcom | Company report | 85% |
| Aura | Company report | 85% |
| Maxim Integrated Products | Company report | 85% |
| AltoBeam | Company report | 85% |
| Rafael | Company report | 85% |
| Analog Devices | Company report | 85% |
| Dialog | Company report | 85% |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | Company report | 85% |
| Qorvo Inc | Company report | 85% |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Semtech Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Lattice Semiconductor Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Skyworks Solutions Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Cirrus Logic Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Wolfspeed Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Quicklogic Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Transphorm Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sitime Corporation | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Silicon Laboratories Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | Semiconductor Solutions 64.81 % |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | Analog 81.11 % |
| Qualcomm Inc | QCT 85.49 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | Intelligent Power 53.35 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | 7,355 | 443,670 | -20,264 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,435,263 | 2,700,121 | 1,159,545 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 255,449 | 629,273 | 215,545 |
| Analog Devices Inc | 178,311 | 520,014 | 135,242 |
| Qualcomm Inc | 176,823 | 847,481 | 178,058 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 126,134 | 1,165,227 | 676,350 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,443,744 | 879,891 | 272,938 |
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | Rest of world 40.18 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Asia Pacific 60.15 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | China 43.75 % |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | CHINA 48.68 % |
| On Semiconductor Corporation | Hong Kong 32.97 % |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | United States 65.72 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 107 companies in Silicon Laboratories Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Silicon Laboratories Inc ranks #35 of 107 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.07 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,187, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 4,532,552 | 45.12 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 790,050 | 7.86 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 744,957 | 7.42 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 287,253 | 2.86 % |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | United Microelectronics Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 35 | Silicon Laboratories Inc | 7,355 | 0.07 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Silicon Laboratories Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | Sitime Corporation | 11,461 | 39.44 % |
| 31 | Semtech Corp | 10,408 | 45.51 % |
| 32 | Amkor Technology Inc | 8,204 | -9.61 % |
| 33 | Rambus Inc | 8,197 | -31.26 % |
| 34 | Sanmina Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 35 | Silicon Laboratories Inc | 7,355 | 71.31 % |
| 36 | Ttm Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 37 | Viavi Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 38 | Formfactor inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 39 | Cirrus Logic Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 40 | Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Silicon Laboratories Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (180 companies). See the full Semiconductors industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.61 % | 29.37 % (avg) | -28.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -0.04 % | industry median | -3.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -0.01 % | 4.97 % (avg) | -5.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.97 % | 8.78 % (avg) | -3.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (180 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Semiconductors industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 39.2x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 1,182.8x | 21.5x | +1,161.3x |
| P/B | 6.6x | 6.0x | +0.6x |
| Return on Equity | -0.04 % | industry aggregate | -46.22 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -0.97 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 12.93 % | -3.54 % | 5.87 % | -18.70 % | 41.92 % | -23.60 % | -25.26 % | 34.20 % |
| Operating Margin | 9.81 % | 6.77 % | 4.32 % | -4.56 % | 11.66 % | -3.09 % | -28.33 % | -9.00 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.42 % | 2.20 % | 1.34 % | -0.81 % | 3.08 % | -0.92 % | -7.31 % | -3.22 % |
| P/E | 44.0x | 271.1x | 443.2x | 4.1x | 54.9x | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Silicon Laboratories Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 45% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,187 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.97 % vs industry average 8.78 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Silicon Laboratories Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Silicon Laboratories Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+6.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 46.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.2% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 45.12 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | 2.32 | 4.90 | - |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.99 | 2.05 | 0.75 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1.17 | 4.81 | 0.84 |
| Analog Devices Inc | 0.70 | 2.08 | 0.25 |
| Qualcomm Inc | 0.53 | 2.47 | 0.62 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 0.98 | 2.25 | 0.31 |
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | Q2 2026 | +18.8 % | - |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +85.5 % | +216.1 % |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | Q3 2026 | +27.7 % | +77.8 % |
| Analog Devices Inc | Q1 2026 | +37.2 % | +106.5 % |
| Qualcomm Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.0 % | -24.9 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Q1 2026 | +27.6 % | -70.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +40.4 % | +99.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.2 % | +41.6 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +74.0 % | +274.6 % |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | Q3 2026 | +7.4 % | -61.3 % |
| Analog Devices Inc | Q1 2026 | +15.1 % | - |
| Qualcomm Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.4 % | +68.7 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | Q1 2026 | +22.8 % | +30.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | - | - | - |
| Broadcom Inc | 21.57% | 24.07% | 43.74% |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 20.08% | 21.75% | 40.51% |
| Analog Devices Inc | 6.90% | 7.53% | 9.78% |
| Qualcomm Inc | 17.24% | 21.12% | 38.04% |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 22.14% | 25.02% | 33.73% |
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Silicon Laboratories Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories Inc | - | 8.59 |
| Broadcom Inc | 37.41 | 16.11 |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 35.97 | 12.30 |
| Analog Devices Inc | 54.10 | 14.00 |
| Qualcomm Inc | 18.99 | 4.01 |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 56.94 | 14.47 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 36.29 | 11.21 |
Sign in to see all peers for Silicon Laboratories Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.