Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ranger Energy Services Inc (RNGR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors
8
Named by the company
Peer Group Market Share
2.16 %
vs 1.78 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
25.53 %
Peers: 2.92 %
Net Margin
3.91 %
Peers: 6.87 %

Key Findings: Ranger Energy Services Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 607M vs 32,294M combined for its competitors (1.8% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+16.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (-1.0%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Ranger Energy Services Inc generated 25.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 2.9% for its competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 3.9% net margin compares with 6.9% for the peer group.
  • Scale: Ranger Energy Services Inc ranks #78 of 133 companies by market capitalization in the Oil And Gas Production industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Ranger Energy Services Inc accounted for 2.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.8% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.26M compares with $0.50M for the peer group (0.5x).
  • Structure: Ranger Energy Services Inc operates in the following segments: High Specification Rigs, Processing Solutions and Ancillary Services, Wireline Service.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

RNGR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Ranger Energy Services Inc reported revenue growth of 25.53 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 2.92 %.

With a net margin of 3.91 %, Ranger Energy Services Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (6.87 %).

Ranger Energy Services Inc generated 2.16 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.78 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/RNGR/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/RNGR/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/RNGR/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.
Explore the Financial Data API

Ranger Energy Services Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Revenue growth, year on year

Ranger Energy Services Inc +25.5 %
Competitors combined +2.9 %

Net income growth, year on year

Ranger Energy Services Inc -5.5 %
Competitors combined +26.0 %

Net margin

Ranger Energy Services Inc +3.9 %
Competitors combined +6.9 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Ranger Energy Services Inc +16.4 %
Competitors combined -1.0 %

TTM net margin

Ranger Energy Services Inc +2.4 %
Competitors combined +6.8 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Ranger Energy Services Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ranger Energy Services Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Ranger Energy Services inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ranger Energy Services Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.2% year over year, combined, vs 25.5% for Ranger Energy Services Inc. Ranger Energy Services Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Ranger Energy Services inc Yes Yes Yes No
Competitors combined (7) 86% 71% 71% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 67% 57% 71% 33%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

2.2%market share
  • Ranger Energy Services Inc2.2%
  • Competitors combined97.8%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Ranger Energy Services Inc and its 8 competitors.

See Ranger Energy Services Inc's full market share breakdown »

RNGR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

RNGR Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
66.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(4 of 6)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(4 of 10)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Ranger Energy Services inc -2.30 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (6) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ranger Energy Services Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

RNGR Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

RNGR Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

RNGR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

RNGR Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Patterson uti Energy Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Helix Energy Solutions Group inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Select Water Solutions inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Halliburton Company 282.9% Outperformed
5 Usa Compression Partners Lp 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ranger Energy Services Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Publicly Traded Peers of Ranger Energy Services inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Ranger Energy Services inc 300.42 606.70 14.30 2,300
Halliburton Company 26,490.88 22,476.00 2,004.00 48,000
Patterson uti Energy Inc 3,812.81 4,838.35 -24.59 7,900
Usa Compression Partners Lp 3,636.11 849.96 109.86 1,479
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc 1,569.93 1,303.50 39.67 2,212
Propetro Holding Corp 988.24 1,221.55 2.00 1,700
SUBTOTAL 36,941.74 32,900.63 2,196.06 67,163
2 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Ranger Energy Services inc .

Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ranger Energy Services inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from Ranger Energy Services Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Patterson uti Energy Inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Propetro Holding Corp Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nextier Oilfield Solutions Inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Halliburton Company Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Usa Compression Partners Lp Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ncs Multistage Holdings Inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Select Water Solutions inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ranger Energy Services Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Ranger Energy Services inc High Specification Rigs 61.38 % Processing Solutions and Ancillary Services 22.90 % Wireline Service 15.72 %
Halliburton Company Completion and Production 54.16 % Drilling and Evaluation 45.84 % -
Patterson uti Energy Inc Completion Services 60.22 % Completions Services 60.22 % Drilling Services 31.09 %
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc Well Intervention 72.77 % Robotics 21.67 % Shallow Water Abandonment 7.38 %
Propetro Holding Corp Hydraulic Fracturing 66.17 % Wireline Operating 17.07 % Cementing Operating 10.53 %
Select Water Solutions inc Water Services 52.82 % Water Infrastructure 26.65 % Chemical technologies 21.52 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Ranger Energy Services inc 300 263,783 6,217
Halliburton Company 26,491 468,250 41,750
Patterson uti Energy Inc 3,813 612,449 -3,113
Usa Compression Partners Lp 3,636 574,686 74,281
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc 1,570 589,284 17,933
Propetro Holding Corp 988 718,562 1,179
PEERS TOTAL 36,641 497,879 33,636
2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Ranger Energy Services inc .

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Halliburton Company North America 37.87 % Middle East/Asia 24.64 % Latin America 19.67 %
Ncs Multistage Holdings Inc US 53.34 % CA 34.97 % Other Countries 11.69 %
Select Water Solutions inc Permian Basin 53.67 % Marcellus Utica 11.42 % Rockies 11.23 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 112 companies in Ranger Energy Services Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Ranger Energy Services Inc ranks #78 of 112 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.02 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 788, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Shell Plc 297,503 18.60 %
2 Totalenergies Se 210,564 13.16 %
3 Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro Sa 137,905 8.62 %
4 Canadian Natural Resources Limited 107,018 6.69 %
5 Eni Spa 1,234 5.2%
6 Eog Resources Inc 1,234 5.2%
7 Slb Limited 1,234 5.2%
8 Occidental Petroleum Corporation 1,234 5.2%
9 Diamondback Energy Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Cenovus Energy Inc 1,234 5.2%
78 Ranger Energy Services inc 300 0.02 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ranger Energy Services Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
73 Primeenergy Resources Corporation 440 40.69 % -4.04 % 0.93 0.79
74 Core Laboratories Inc 414 -42.89 % -27.63 % 1.21 -1.12
75 Zion Oil and Gas Inc 371 68.37 % -20.02 % 0.21 0.89
76 Natural Gas Services Group Inc 355 -2.02 % -24.88 % 1.06 -0.01
77 Gran Tierra Energy Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
78 Ranger Energy Services inc 300 -2.31 % -21.82 % 0.94 -0.29
79 Sable Offshore Corp 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
80 North American Construction Group Ltd 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
81 Ring Energy Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
82 Spirits Time International Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
83 New Era Energy and Digital Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ranger Energy Services Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (245 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 12.10 % 26.12 % (avg) -14.0 pp
Operating Margin 3.74 % industry median -7.4 pp
EBITDA Margin 13.04 % 18.44 % (avg) -5.4 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 6.15 % 27.32 % (avg) -21.2 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (245 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil And Gas Production industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E 27.3x 16.3x +11.1x
EV / EBITDA 4.9x 9.3x -4.4x
P/B 1.3x 2.0x -0.6x
Return on Equity 4.87 % industry aggregate -7.20 %
Return on Invested Capital 3.54 % 0.94 % (avg) 2.60 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.
Metric 201920202021202320242025
Revenue Growth --56.07 %4.62 %-10.29 %-4.24 %
Operating Margin --8.04 %-13.82 %5.80 %5.01 %2.82 %
Return on Invested Capital 0.56 %-4.70 %-10.08 %6.32 %5.01 %2.55 %
P/E ---12.1x17.5x25.2x

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Strategic Group Map

Ranger Energy Services Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)NOACLBHLXRanger Energy Services IncNCSMPTENEPMENSVESES

Ranger Energy Services Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 6.1% and operating margin of 3.7% compares with an average of 3.9% growth and 2.9% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Ranger Energy Services Inc sits above that peer average on growth and above it on margin.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Ranger Energy Services Inc

Ranger Energy Services Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -2.1% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 788 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 6.15 % vs industry average 27.32 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)

Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Ranger Energy Services Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest Ranger Energy Services Inc
Harvest / Divest

Ranger Energy Services Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+16.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

  • Operating margin 7.4 points below the industry median.
  • Return on equity 7.2 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Ranger Energy Services inc 0.20 1.85 0.04 1.41
Halliburton Company 0.35 2.04 0.66 0.88
Patterson uti Energy Inc 0.17 1.74 0.39 0.89
Usa Compression Partners Lp 0.04 1.41 57.37 0.37
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc 1.64 2.90 0.20 0.50
Propetro Holding Corp 1.64 2.68 0.50 0.70
2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Ranger Energy Services inc .

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Ranger Energy Services inc Q2 2026+25.5 %+10.9 %-5.5 %+130.0 %
Halliburton CompanyQ3 2026+1.8 %-0.2 %+1,985.0 %-21.9 %
Patterson uti Energy Inc Q3 2026+14.1 %+9.3 %--
Usa Compression Partners LpQ2 2026-17.0 %-98.3 %-94.9 %-99.9 %
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc Q2 2026+0.7 %+5.6 %--
Propetro Holding Corp Q3 2026+20.9 %+16.2 %--
PEERS TOTAL+5.1 %-1.4 %+1,077,513.5 %-7.0 %
2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Ranger Energy Services inc .

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Ranger Energy Services inc Q2 2026+24.1 %+9.3 %+1.6 %-65.0 %
Halliburton CompanyQ3 2026--+1.9 %+13.2 %
Patterson uti Energy Inc Q3 2026+308.0 %--2.2 %-9.3 %
Usa Compression Partners LpQ2 2026+76.9 %-98.2 %--
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc Q2 2026+4.0 %-11.2 %+60.6 %+155.3 %
Propetro Holding Corp Q3 2026+14.1 %+134,772.5 %+179.7 %+100.8 %
2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Ranger Energy Services inc .

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Ranger Energy Services inc 3.33%4.10%4.87%6.15151.36
Halliburton Company7.85%9.85%18.41%4.295.52
Patterson uti Energy Inc ---5.819.75
Usa Compression Partners Lp4.79%5.11%313.76%10.222.04
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc 1.53%1.52%2.52%5.04-
Propetro Holding Corp 0.12%0.13%0.21%5.1335.81
2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Ranger Energy Services inc .

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Ranger Energy Services Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Ranger Energy Services inc 20.880.50--0.99
Halliburton Company13.381.18--2.37
Patterson uti Energy Inc -0.79-25.021.24
Usa Compression Partners Lp23.124.280.43-286.13
Helix Energy Solutions Group inc 39.811.20-4.720.99
Propetro Holding Corp -0.81-1.491.01
PEERS AVERAGE16.821.1240.832.01
2 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Ranger Energy Services inc .

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API Connect Your AI