Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Central North Airport Group's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Central North Airport Group (OMAB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
22.30 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
33.61 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Central North Airport Group vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 887M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Central North Airport Group ranks #3 of 19 companies by market capitalization in the Special Transportation Services industry, holding 4.6% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Central North Airport Group accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

OMAB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Central North Airport Group generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/OMAB/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/OMAB/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/OMAB/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Special Transportation Services industry grew revenue 8.7% year over year, combined, vs 22.3% for Central North Airport Group. Central North Airport Group's share of combined industry revenue moved from 4.28% to 4.81%, a gain of 0.53 percentage points.

Central North Airport Group's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Central North Airport Group Yes Yes Yes Yes
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 83% 100% 67% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Central North Airport Group100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Central North Airport Group and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Central North Airport Group's full market share breakdown »

OMAB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

OMAB Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Central North Airport Group's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
14.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 7)
14.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Central North Airport Group -1.50 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Central North Airport Group's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

OMAB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

OMAB Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 7) Percent change over the selected range

OMAB Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

OMAB Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Central North Airport Group's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company's airports generally do not face significant competition, except for those serving tourist destinations such as Acapulco, Mazatlán, and Zihuatanejo. These airports compete with other vacation destination airports in Mexico, including Los Cabos, Cancún, and Puerto Vallarta, as well as airports abroad in Florida, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, other Caribbean islands, and Central America. The attractiveness of these locations is influenced by factors such as the Mexican and U.S. economies and other commercial centers in Mexico. There is also potential competitive risk if Aeropuerto Internacional del Norte expands into commercial aviation. Additionally, the Mexican government could grant new concessions that would compete with the company's airports.

Central North Airport Group's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Aeropuerto Internacional del Norte Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Central North Airport Group's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.