Asics's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Asics (ASICSTYO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Asics vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5,613M vs 87,334M combined for its competitors (6.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-2.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Asics generated 20.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2025, vs -4.5% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 0.0% net margin compares with 1.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Asics accounted for 5.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 4.6% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ASICSTYO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2025
Asics reported revenue growth of 20.83 % year on year in Q2 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -4.47 %.
With a net margin of 0.00 %, Asics reported lower profitability than its competitors (0.98 %).
Asics generated 5.76 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 4.61 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Asics vs. its Competitors, Q2 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Asics reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Asics and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Asics's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Apparel, Footwear & Accessories industry grew revenue 8.3% year over year, combined, vs 20.8% for Asics. Asics's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.55% to 1.73%, a gain of 0.18 percentage points.
Asics's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ASICSTYO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ASICSTYO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nike Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Asics's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of ASICS Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 ASICS Corporation |
- | 5,613.00 |
 Nike Inc |
57,275.28 | 45,891.00 |
 Under Armour Inc |
2,198.56 | 4,930.23 |
 Puma SE |
- | 9,673.00 |
 Adidas |
- | 26,840.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 59,473.84 | 92,947.23 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on ASICS Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Asics's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Asics reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| On Holding Ag | Company report | 85% |
| A k a Brands Holding Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Dick s Sporting Goods inc | Company report | 85% |
| Adidas | Company report | 85% |
| Under Armour Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Nike Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Puma SE | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Asics's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Asics's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Nike Inc | North America 45.72 % |
| Under Armour Inc | Corporate Segment and Other Operating -0.40 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Asics's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | - | - | - |
| Nike Inc | 57,275 | 628,644 | 42,370 |
| Under Armour Inc | 2,199 | 810,626 | -80,974 |
| Puma SE | - | - | - |
| Adidas | - | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 59,474 | 1,104,350 | 32,884 |
Asics's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Under Armour Inc | North America 59.37 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Asics's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 2.99 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Asics's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Asics's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of competitors (75.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-2.2% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Asics's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | - | - | - |
| Nike Inc | 0.63 | 2.09 | 0.55 |
| Under Armour Inc | 0.48 | 1.78 | 0.54 |
| Puma SE | - | - | - |
| Adidas | - | - | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Asics's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | Q2 2025 | +20.8 % | - |
| Nike Inc | Q3 2026 | -4.3 % | -2.1 % |
| Under Armour Inc | Q2 2026 | -3.2 % | - |
| Puma SE | Q2 2025 | +0.4 % | - |
| Adidas | Q2 2025 | +8.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.1 % | -1.6 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Asics's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | Q2 2025 | - | - |
| Nike Inc | Q3 2026 | -5.3 % | -3.9 % |
| Under Armour Inc | Q2 2026 | -14.2 % | -58.7 % |
| Puma SE | Q2 2025 | - | - |
| Adidas | Q2 2025 | - | - |
Asics's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | - | - | - |
| Nike Inc | 8.26% | 13.37% | 21.56% |
| Under Armour Inc | - | - | - |
| Puma SE | - | - | - |
| Adidas | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Asics's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| ASICS Corporation | - | - |
| Nike Inc | 18.55 | 1.25 |
| Under Armour Inc | - | 0.45 |
| Puma SE | - | - |
| Adidas | - | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 22.87 | 0.64 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.