Cvr Partners Lp's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cvr Partners Lp (UAN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Cvr Partners Lp vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 677M vs 40,014M combined for tracked competitors (1.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+9.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Cvr Partners Lp generated 20.0% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 18.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 38.3% net margin compares with 2.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Cvr Partners Lp ranks #13 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Agricultural Production industry, holding 0.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Cvr Partners Lp accounted for 1.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.8% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $2.12M compares with $1.99M for the peer group (1.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
UAN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Cvr Partners Lp reported revenue growth of 19.95 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 18.87 %.
With a net margin of 38.33 %, Cvr Partners Lp achieved higher profitability than its competitors (2.46 %).
Cvr Partners Lp generated 1.81 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.79 % a year earlier.
Cvr Partners Lp vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Cvr Partners Lp and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Cvr Partners Lp's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs 20.0% for Cvr Partners Lp. Cvr Partners Lp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.17% to 0.18%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Cvr Partners Lp's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| Competitors combined (9) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
UAN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
UAN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
UAN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
UAN Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cf Industries Holdings inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Nutrien Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Lsb Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Barrick Mining Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Intrepid Potash inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cvr Partners Lp's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Cvr Partners Lp's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Cvr Partners Lp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | 1,306.24 | 676.85 |
| Barrick Mining Corp | 70,140.63 | 16,956.00 |
| Nutrien Ltd | 35,019.57 | 25,949.00 |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | 17,776.99 | 7,739.00 |
| Mosaic Co | 7,073.28 | 12,246.70 |
| Cvr Energy Inc | 5,100.38 | 8,473.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 142,181.27 | 83,699.75 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Cvr Partners Lp.
Sources: Cvr Partners Lp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cvr Partners Lp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Cvr Partners Lp's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LSB Industries, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nutrien Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Koch Fertilizer Company, LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| OCI N.V. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cvr Energy Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cvr Partners Lp's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Cvr Partners Lp's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | Nitrogen Fertilizer 100.00 % |
| Mosaic Co | Phosphates 47.57 % |
| Icahn Enterprises l p | Energy Segment 89.17 % |
| Lsb Industries Inc | Chemical 100.00 % |
| Intrepid Potash inc | Trio 53.24 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Cvr Partners Lp's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | 1,306 | 2,115,172 | 500,697 |
| Barrick Mining Corp | 70,141 | 2,608,615 | 1,100,615 |
| Nutrien Ltd | 35,020 | 8,527,440 | 754,847 |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | 17,777 | 2,668,621 | 862,069 |
| Mosaic Co | 7,073 | 924,349 | -69,605 |
| Cvr Energy Inc | 5,100 | 5,530,679 | 111,619 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 140,875 | 1,987,430 | 257,284 |
Cvr Partners Lp's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Mosaic Co | United States 39.43 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Cvr Partners Lp's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 39 companies in Cvr Partners Lp's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Cvr Partners Lp ranks #13 of 39 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.74 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,571, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archer daniels midland Co | 39,540 | 25.42 % |
| 2 | Nutrien Ltd | 35,003 | 22.51 % |
| 3 | Bunge Global Sa | 21,394 | 13.76 % |
| 4 | Cf Industries Holdings inc | 18,057 | 11.61 % |
| 5 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Mosaic Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Icl Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Seaboard Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Scotts Miracle gro Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Andersons Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 13 | Cvr Partners Lp | 1,147 | 0.74 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cvr Partners Lp's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-06-26.
Cvr Partners Lp's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Seaboard Corporation | 3,836 | 8.55 % |
| 9 | Scotts Miracle gro Co | 2,981 | -11.01 % |
| 10 | Andersons Inc | 2,302 | 69.24 % |
| 11 | Adecoagro S a | 1,464 | 27.26 % |
| 12 | Dole Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Cvr Partners Lp | 1,147 | 20.01 % |
| 14 | Mission Produce Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Universal Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Brightview Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Village Farms International Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Brasilagro Brazilian Agricultural Real Estate Company | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Cvr Partners Lp's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Cvr Partners Lp's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Agricultural Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (58 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.53 % | 21.12 % (avg) | +12.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | 28.10 % | industry median | +26.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 38.64 % | 2.16 % (avg) | +36.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 9.93 % | 4.73 % (avg) | +5.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Cvr Partners Lp's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Agricultural Production industry average (58 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 7.9x | 20.8x | -12.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.1x | 9.8x | -2.7x |
| P/B | - | 1.7x | - |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 18.23 % | 1.23 % (avg) | 17.00 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Cvr Partners Lp's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -3.17 % | 23.20 % | -7.15 % | 6.13 % | 15.12 % | -13.42 % | -22.91 % | 15.36 % |
| Operating Margin | 23.77 % | 7.49 % | -2.79 % | 1.80 % | 6.77 % | -9.97 % | -0.91 % | 21.23 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.82 % | 1.19 % | -0.39 % | 0.29 % | 1.35 % | -2.06 % | -0.55 % | 14.41 % |
| P/E | 88.8x | - | - | - | - | - | 13.2x | 10.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Cvr Partners Lp's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Cvr Partners Lp's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Cvr Partners Lp is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Cvr Partners Lp's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Cvr Partners Lp's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Cvr Partners Lp falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.03x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 4.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Cvr Partners Lp's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,571 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 9.93 % vs industry average 4.73 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Cvr Partners Lp's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Cvr Partners Lp's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Cvr Partners Lp's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Cvr Partners Lp falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Cvr Partners Lp's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 26.3 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.03x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (7.9x vs 20.8x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Cvr Partners Lp's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | 1.20 | 2.67 | 1.62 |
| Barrick Mining Corp | 1.92 | 2.92 | 0.18 |
| Nutrien Ltd | 0.06 | 1.34 | 0.02 |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | 0.17 | 3.34 | 0.39 |
| Mosaic Co | 0.06 | 1.26 | 0.35 |
| Cvr Energy Inc | 0.66 | 1.61 | 2.61 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cvr Partners Lp's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | Q2 2026 | +20.0 % | +99.9 % |
| Barrick Mining Corp | Q4 2025 | +48.8 % | +266.3 % |
| Nutrien Ltd | Q4 2025 | +3.7 % | +228.1 % |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | Q2 2026 | +17.6 % | +76.6 % |
| Mosaic Co | Q2 2026 | -6.0 % | - |
| Cvr Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | +55.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +18.0 % | +196.0 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cvr Partners Lp's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | Q2 2026 | -4.3 % | +160.9 % |
| Barrick Mining Corp | Q4 2025 | +4.2 % | +23.8 % |
| Nutrien Ltd | Q4 2025 | +0.7 % | -7.1 % |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | Q2 2026 | -5.1 % | +10.6 % |
| Mosaic Co | Q2 2026 | +4.9 % | -50.4 % |
| Cvr Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | +43.5 % | +4.9 % |
Cvr Partners Lp's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | 15.70% | 15.35% | 36.38% |
| Barrick Mining Corp | 13.87% | 15.24% | 19.92% |
| Nutrien Ltd | 4.39% | 5.57% | 9.06% |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | 17.24% | 15.64% | 30.63% |
| Mosaic Co | - | - | - |
| Cvr Energy Inc | 4.37% | 4.86% | 20.01% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Cvr Partners Lp's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Cvr Partners Lp | 8.15 | 1.93 |
| Barrick Mining Corp | 14.02 | 4.14 |
| Nutrien Ltd | 15.45 | 1.35 |
| Cf Industries Holdings inc | 8.63 | 2.30 |
| Mosaic Co | - | 0.58 |
| Cvr Energy Inc | 74.04 | 0.60 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.03 | 1.70 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.