La Z Boy Incorporated's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of La Z Boy Incorporated (LZB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: La Z Boy Incorporated vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,110M vs 24,623M combined for tracked competitors (7.9% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-9.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+6.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: La Z Boy Incorporated generated -3.4% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 15.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -0.4% net margin compares with 8.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: La Z Boy Incorporated ranks #5 of 17 companies by market capitalization in the Furniture & Fixtures industry, holding 2.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: La Z Boy Incorporated accounted for 6.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 8.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.21M compares with $0.36M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LZB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
La Z Boy Incorporated reported revenue contraction of 3.35 % year on year in Q1 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 15.14 %.
With a net margin of -0.42 %, La Z Boy Incorporated reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.80 %).
La Z Boy Incorporated generated 6.79 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 7.99 % a year earlier.
La Z Boy Incorporated vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across La Z Boy Incorporated and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across La Z Boy Incorporated's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Furniture & Fixtures industry grew revenue -5.4% year over year, combined, vs -3.4% for La Z Boy Incorporated. La Z Boy Incorporated's share of combined industry revenue moved from 3.73% to 3.81%, a gain of 0.08 percentage points.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (14) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LZB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LZB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LZB Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flexsteel Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Haverty Furniture Companies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Steelcase Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Hooker Furnishings Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Bassett Furniture Industries Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for La Z Boy Incorporated's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of La z boy Incorporated
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | 1,179.23 | 2,109.68 |
| Williams sonoma Inc | 27,105.00 | 8,004.50 |
| Hni Corporation | 3,407.09 | 4,391.80 |
| Rh | 2,288.20 | 3,425.68 |
| Steelcase Inc | 1,947.93 | 3,259.00 |
| Millerknoll Inc | 1,384.01 | 3,840.40 |
| SUBTOTAL | 42,063.10 | 33,417.16 |
Sign in to see all competitors of La z boy Incorporated.
Sources: La z boy Incorporated's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on La z boy Incorporated versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | 1,179 | 206,831 | 8,101 |
| Williams sonoma Inc | 27,105 | 404,268 | 59,550 |
| Hni Corporation | 3,407 | 225,221 | 221 |
| Rh | 2,288 | 1,415,571 | 42,583 |
| Steelcase Inc | 1,948 | 288,407 | 8,434 |
| Millerknoll Inc | 1,384 | 533,389 | 13,292 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 40,884 | 360,245 | 21,785 |
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Williams sonoma Inc | Non-US 4.07 % |
| Steelcase Inc | UNITED STATES 73.98 % |
| Millerknoll Inc | United States 71.63 % |
| Xmax Inc | North America 100.00 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | Wholesale 67.70 % |
| Williams sonoma Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Hni Corporation | Workplace furnishings 89.90 % |
| Rh | RH Segment 86.89 % |
| Millerknoll Inc | North America Contract 53.65 % |
| Leggett and Platt Inc | Bedding Products 40.39 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 16 companies in La Z Boy Incorporated's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.La Z Boy Incorporated ranks #5 of 16 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 2.19 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,373, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams sonoma Inc | 27,105 | 50.36 % |
| 2 | Somnigroup International Inc | 13,360 | 24.82 % |
| 3 | Mohawk Industries Inc | 7,528 | 13.99 % |
| 4 | Interface Inc | 2,043 | 3.80 % |
| 5 | La z boy Incorporated | 1,179 | 2.19 % |
| 6 | Masterbrand Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Ethan Allen Interiors Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Flexsteel Industries Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Bassett Furniture Industries Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Hooker Furnishings Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of La Z Boy Incorporated's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams sonoma Inc | 27,105 | 13.36 % |
| 2 | Somnigroup International Inc | 13,360 | -23.39 % |
| 3 | Mohawk Industries Inc | 7,528 | -1.54 % |
| 4 | Interface Inc | 2,043 | 23.61 % |
| 5 | La z boy Incorporated | 1,179 | -13.15 % |
| 6 | Masterbrand Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Ethan Allen Interiors Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Flexsteel Industries Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Bassett Furniture Industries Incorporated | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Hooker Furnishings Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of La Z Boy Incorporated's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Furniture & Fixtures industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (23 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.37 % | 37.07 % (avg) | +7.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 4.98 % | industry median | +3.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.61 % | -0.08 % (avg) | +7.7 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.85 % | 2.18 % (avg) | +1.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Furniture & Fixtures industry average (23 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.4x | 17.4x | +1.0x |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.1x | 10.6x | -3.5x |
| P/B | 1.4x | 2.7x | -1.3x |
| Return on Equity | 7.92 % | industry aggregate | -4.98 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.44 % | -1.11 % (avg) | 5.55 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 8.56 % | 4.61 % | -11.64 % | 34.94 % | 15.42 % | -16.98 % | 1.93 % | 1.65 % |
| Operating Margin | 8.07 % | 7.96 % | 6.33 % | 7.58 % | 9.55 % | 7.54 % | 7.47 % | 5.52 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 9.85 % | 8.18 % | 5.32 % | 8.23 % | 11.06 % | 6.88 % | 6.67 % | 5.64 % |
| P/E | 13.3x | 20.0x | 26.1x | 13.1x | 6.3x | 12.7x | 14.5x | 17.4x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Strategic Group Map
Every company in La Z Boy Incorporated's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. La Z Boy Incorporated is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
La Z Boy Incorporated's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs La Z Boy Incorporated's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
La Z Boy Incorporated falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.04x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 0.0% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Williams sonoma Inc alone holds 50% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 3,373 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.85 % vs industry average 2.18 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See La Z Boy Incorporated's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See La Z Boy Incorporated's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
La Z Boy Incorporated falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
La Z Boy Incorporated's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-9.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.04x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Williams sonoma Inc , holding 50.36 % of industry market cap.
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | 0.72 | 1.83 | - |
| Williams sonoma Inc | 0.48 | 1.40 | - |
| Hni Corporation | 0.12 | 1.32 | 0.71 |
| Rh | 0.05 | 1.19 | 124.68 |
| Steelcase Inc | 0.44 | 1.75 | 0.46 |
| Millerknoll Inc | 0.18 | 1.62 | 1.00 |
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | Q2 2026 | -3.4 % | - |
| Williams sonoma Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.7 % | +36.6 % |
| Hni Corporation | Q2 2026 | +121.0 % | +5.8 % |
| Rh | Q1 2026 | -1.6 % | - |
| Steelcase Inc | Q3 2025 | +4.8 % | -44.5 % |
| Millerknoll Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.3 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.1 % | +36.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | Q2 2026 | -5.6 % | +26.1 % |
| Williams sonoma Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.5 % | +12.9 % |
| Hni Corporation | Q2 2026 | +117.2 % | +100.0 % |
| Rh | Q1 2026 | +2.4 % | -25.4 % |
| Steelcase Inc | Q3 2025 | +4.7 % | +44.8 % |
| Millerknoll Inc | Q2 2026 | +3.9 % | -1.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
La Z Boy Incorporated's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | 4.17% | 6.25% | 7.92% |
| Williams sonoma Inc | 22.15% | 25.15% | 57.79% |
| Hni Corporation | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.28% |
| Rh | 2.14% | 2.67% | 515.43% |
| Steelcase Inc | 4.12% | 5.37% | 9.82% |
| Millerknoll Inc | 2.42% | 2.43% | 7.29% |
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
La Z Boy Incorporated's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| La z boy Incorporated | 15.04 | 0.56 |
| Williams sonoma Inc | 23.45 | 3.39 |
| Hni Corporation | 1,575.17 | 0.78 |
| Rh | 23.49 | 0.67 |
| Steelcase Inc | 20.43 | 0.60 |
| Millerknoll Inc | 15.13 | 0.36 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.29 | 1.26 |
Sign in to see all peers for La z boy Incorporated.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.