Laird Superfood Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Laird Superfood Inc (LSF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Laird Superfood Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 81M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+103.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Laird Superfood Inc ranks #43 of 62 companies by market capitalization in the Food Processing industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Laird Superfood Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LSF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Laird Superfood Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Food Processing industry grew revenue 12.8% year over year, combined, vs 250.5% for Laird Superfood Inc. Laird Superfood Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.03%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Laird Superfood Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laird Superfood Inc | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LSF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LSF Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
LSF Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LSF Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Laird Superfood Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Laird Superfood Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bob’s Red Mill | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kellogg | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Coca-Cola Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gatorade | Named by the company | 85% |
| PepsiCo | Named by the company | 85% |
| Liquid I.V | Named by the company | 85% |
| Danone SA | Named by the company | 85% |
| LMNT | Named by the company | 85% |
| TreeHouse Foods Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Airgain Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Mills | Named by the company | 85% |
| PowerAde | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dean Foods Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nestle SA | Named by the company | 85% |
| Qrons Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Laird Superfood Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.