Dentsply Sirona Inc (XRAY) — Comparison of Productivity to Peers

Dentsply Sirona Inc 's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Table 1: Market Cap, Revenue per Employee, Income per Employee for the 12 Months period ended in Q3 2025

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
MARKET CAP
(Millions $)
REVENUE / EMPLOYEE
($) in 12 months
INCOME / EMPLOYEE
($) in 12 months
Dentsply Sirona Inc
XRAY
2,314 241,600 -58,733
Align Technology inc
ALGN
11,867 184,284 17,510
Biolase Inc
BIOL
1 174,880 -131,812
Henry Schein Inc
HSIC
9,228 680,947 21,684
Patterson Companies Inc
PDCO
2,791 1,050,271 22,330
Smiledirectclub Inc
SDC
30 295,709 -184,776
Sonendo Inc
SONX
0 152,683 -138,777
Danaher Corporation
DHR
165,842 385,206 55,603
Milestone Scientific Inc
MLSS
29 513,775 -392,188
Envista Holdings Corporation
NVST
3,677 267,408 1,561
Owens and Minor inc
OMI
229 489,632 -97,842
SUBTOTAL 193,694 425,553 20,568

What this table shows: Productivity metrics illustrate how effectively a company converts workforce and capital into value. Higher Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee generally reflect stronger operating efficiency and business scalability. First row shows Company's Productivity, followed by it's corporate peers. Click any company name in the table to view its complete financial analysis and comparison.


Dentsply Sirona Inc 's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Table 2: Quick Ratio, Working Capital, Debt/Equity, Asset Turnover

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
QUICK
(Ratio)
WORKING CAPITAL
(Ratio)
DEBT / EQUITY
(Ratio)
ASSET TURNOVER
(Ratio)
Dentsply Sirona Inc
XRAY
0.23 1.30 1.25 0.62
Align Technology inc
ALGN
0.48 1.24 - 0.64
Biolase Inc
BIOL
0.21 0.89 - 1.37
Henry Schein Inc
HSIC
0.04 1.40 0.72 1.21
Patterson Companies Inc
PDCO
0.10 1.35 0.46 2.27
Smiledirectclub Inc
SDC
0.62 2.25 - 0.73
Sonendo Inc
SONX
1.15 2.08 1.24 0.72
Danaher Corporation
DHR
- 1.89 0.37 0.29
Milestone Scientific Inc
MLSS
0.48 1.98 0.10 0.99
Envista Holdings Corporation
NVST
1.30 2.23 0.47 0.47
Owens and Minor inc
OMI
0.02 0.96 18.54 1.52
SUBTOTAL 0.14 1.60 0.42 0.50

Dentsply Sirona Inc — Financial Strength vs Peers (Peer Comparison)

This table compares Quick Ratio, Working Capital, Debt-to-Equity, and Asset Turnover for Dentsply Sirona Inc and its closest competitors. Only the top peers are shown publicly to ensure fast loading and a clear overview.

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
QUICK
Ratio
WORKING CAPITAL
Ratio
DEBT / EQUITY
Ratio
ASSET TURNOVER
Ratio
Dentsply Sirona Inc
XRAY
0.23 1.30 1.25 0.62
Align Technology inc
ALGN
0.48 1.24 - 0.64
Biolase Inc
BIOL
0.21 0.89 - 1.37
Henry Schein Inc
HSIC
0.04 1.40 0.72 1.21
Patterson Companies Inc
PDCO
0.10 1.35 0.46 2.27
Smiledirectclub Inc
SDC
0.62 2.25 - 0.73
5 additional peer companies available in the full Financial Strength Comparison dataset.
Unlock Full Competitor List

What this table shows: Financial Strength ratios measure short-term liquidity (Quick Ratio, Working Capital), leverage (Debt/Equity), and operational utilization (Asset Turnover). These indicators highlight how well management allocates resources and maintains financial stability.

Dentsply Sirona Inc 's Underlying Financial Totals (Revenue, Income, Employees) vs Peers Comparison

Table 3: Revenue (TTM), Net Income (TTM), Net Margin, Employees, ending Q3 2025

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
REVENUE (TTM)
Millions $
NET INCOME (TTM)
Millions $
NET MARGIN
(%)
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
Dentsply Sirona Inc
XRAY
3,624.0 -881.0 -24.31% 15,000
Align Technology inc
ALGN
3,982 378 9.5% 21,610
Biolase Inc
BIOL
44 -33 -75.37% 250
Henry Schein Inc
HSIC
12,938 412 3.18% 19,000
Patterson Companies Inc
PDCO
6,512 138 2.13% 6,200
Smiledirectclub Inc
SDC
414 -259 -62.49% 1,400
Sonendo Inc
SONX
31 -28 -90.89% 202
Danaher Corporation
DHR
24,268 3,503 14.43% 63,000
Milestone Scientific Inc
MLSS
9 -7 -76.33% 17
Envista Holdings Corporation
NVST
2,621 15 0.58% 9,800
Owens and Minor inc
OMI
6,708 -1,340 -19.98% 13,700
SUBTOTAL 57,526 2,780 4.83% 135,179

What this table shows: These totals provide the raw financial fundamentals behind the productivity, Revenue and Income per Employee ratios above. Revenue, Net Income, and Employee counts reflect the company’s scale, profitability, and workforce size. TTM refers to trailing twelve months.


Methodology & Data Source: Market Capitalization is computed from the latest available share price (delayed up to 15 minutes, depending on exchange rules) multiplied by the company’s diluted share count as reported in its filings. Revenue and Net Income figures used to calculate Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee are sourced directly from quarterly and annual financial statements submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Employee counts are taken from the most recent Form 10-K or 10-Q disclosure and may be updated by companies in subsequent SEC submissions. All fundamentals are processed through CSIMarket.com’s XBRL normalization pipeline, which standardizes reported values across all issuers and periods.

Data lineage: SEC Filings → XBRL Extraction → CSIMarket Normalization → Productivity Metrics.

This table is one of the productivity comparisons available for Dentsply Sirona Inc . Across CSIMarket, we provide nine related comparison tables showing how Dentsply Sirona Inc performs against its Peers, including additional breakdowns visible through our main navigation bar under:
Stocks → Peers.

This page compares Dentsply Sirona Inc to its Peers based on Productivity (Market Cap, Revenue per Employee, and Net Income per Employee).

• For a deeper productivity comparison against its industry peers, visit
Dentsply Sirona Inc Productivity vs. Industry

• To review historical productivity trends for this company, including long-term changes in Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee, visit
Dentsply Sirona Inc Productivity History


Page last updated:

CSIMarket data powering this analysis is available across multiple delivery channels:
Data Downloads (CSV / Excel)
API & Programmatic Data Access
Enterprise Data Licensing
AI Training & Model Development License
Marketplace Distribution Options

All CSIMarket datasets are designed for analytical workflows, financial modeling, academic research, and AI/ML applications requiring normalized, reliable, and longitudinal financial time series.

To download the tables, please subscribe.