Wearable Devices Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Wearable Devices Ltd (WLDS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Wearable Devices Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 8,648M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Profitability: Its -1,253.0% net margin compares with 4.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Wearable Devices Ltd ranks #14 of 15 companies by market capitalization in the Computer Networks industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Wearable Devices Ltd accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.65M compares with $1.67M for the peer group (0.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
WLDS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
With a net margin of -1,253.01 %, Wearable Devices Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (4.47 %).
Wearable Devices Ltd generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
Wearable Devices Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Wearable Devices Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Wearable Devices Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | - | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
WLDS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
WLDS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
WLDS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Koru Medical Systems Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Wearable Devices Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Wearable Devices Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | 8,861.22 | 8,603.00 |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | 149.02 | 45.11 |
| SUBTOTAL | 9,010.86 | 8,648.75 |
Sources: Wearable Devices Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Wearable Devices Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Named by the company | 85% | |
| Microsoft | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung | Named by the company | 85% |
| CTRL-Labs | Named by the company | 85% |
| Humane Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pison | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wispr.ai | Named by the company | 85% |
| Apple | Named by the company | 85% |
| Facebook Reality Labs | Named by the company | 85% |
| Neuralink Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Snap | Named by the company | 85% |
| Doublepoint Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Meta (Facebook) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pison Technology Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Coolso | Named by the company | 85% |
| Named by the company | 85% | |
| NextMind | Named by the company | 85% |
| TapWithUS | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Wearable Devices Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | Sirius XM 76.04 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Wearable Devices Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | 1 | 647,000 | -8,107,000 |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | 8,861 | 1,680,602 | 171,909 |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | 149 | 617,911 | -24,924 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 9,010 | 1,665,660 | 169,141 |
Wearable Devices Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | Americas 59.51 % |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | US 71.73 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 15 companies in Wearable Devices Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Wearable Devices Ltd ranks #14 of 15 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 4,812, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cisco Systems Inc | 424,835 | 59.05 % |
| 2 | Arista Networks inc | 260,702 | 36.24 % |
| 3 | F5 Inc | 25,094 | 3.49 % |
| 4 | Digi International Inc | 3,015 | 0.42 % |
| 5 | Extreme Networks Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | A10 Networks Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Allot Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Silicom Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Lantronix Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Bos Better Online Solutions Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 14 | Wearable Devices Ltd | 1 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Wearable Devices Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Lantronix Inc | 295 | 61.19 % |
| 10 | Bos Better Online Solutions Ltd | 30 | -1.88 % |
| 11 | Foxx Development Holdings Inc | 18 | -47.47 % |
| 12 | Intrusion Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Tianci International Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Wearable Devices Ltd | 1 | -89.90 % |
| 15 | Hub Cyber Security Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Wearable Devices Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Computer Networks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (28 companies). See the full Computer Networks industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -22.87 % | 46.84 % (avg) | -69.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 3.85 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.09 % | 3.46 % (avg) | -0.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Computer Networks industry average (28 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Computer Networks industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 49.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 23.5x | - |
| P/B | 0.2x | 3.7x | -3.5x |
| Return on Equity | -43.70 % | industry aggregate | -68.17 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -22.42 % | 0.03 % (avg) | -22.45 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 82.22 % | 500.00 % | 23.95 % |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -72.25 % | -101.30 % | -22.42 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Wearable Devices Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Wearable Devices Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Wearable Devices Ltd falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 2.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Cisco Systems Inc alone holds 59% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 4,812 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.09 % vs industry average 3.46 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Wearable Devices Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Wearable Devices Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Wearable Devices Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Wearable Devices Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 68.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Cisco Systems Inc , holding 59.05 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | 4.71 | 14.15 | - |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | 0.03 | 0.36 | 1.04 |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | 1.07 | 2.48 | 0.00 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | Q4 2025 | +23.9 % | - |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.0 % | +16.6 % |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +18.2 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.1 % | +17.4 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Wearable Devices Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | Q4 2025 | +168.0 % | -53.5 % |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +50,700.0 % | -10.3 % |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | Q2 2026 | +12.9 % | +122.8 % |
Wearable Devices Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | - | - | - |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | 3.23% | 3.41% | 7.53% |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Wearable Devices Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Wearable Devices Ltd | - | 0.96 |
| Sirius Xm Holdings Inc | 10.27 | 1.03 |
| Koru Medical Systems Inc | - | 3.30 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 10.36 | 1.04 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.