Worksport Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Worksport Ltd (WKSP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Worksport Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 18M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+15.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Worksport Ltd ranks #50 of 57 companies by market capitalization in the Auto & Truck Parts industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Worksport Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
WKSP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Worksport Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Auto & Truck Parts industry grew revenue 4.5% year over year, combined, vs 28.1% for Worksport Ltd. Worksport Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Worksport Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worksport Ltd | - | Yes | Yes | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
WKSP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
WKSP Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
WKSP Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
Worksport Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Worksport Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Worksport Ltd reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha ESS Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| EcoFlow | Company report | 85% |
| Real Truck | Company report | 85% |
| Paragon | Company report | 85% |
| Anker Technology | Company report | 85% |
| Truck Covers USA | Company report | 85% |
| Agri-Cover | Company report | 85% |
| Truck Accessories Group | Company report | 85% |
| Bluetti | Company report | 85% |
| Paragon | Company report | 85% |
| Milwaukee Tool | Company report | 85% |
| Chilwee Group Co., Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| GES Group Limited Company | Company report | 85% |
| Mitsubishi Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Duracell | Company report | 85% |
| Lion Energy | Company report | 85% |
| Jackery Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Access | Company report | 85% |
| LEER | Company report | 85% |
| Truck Hero | Company report | 85% |
| Truck Accessory Group (TAG) | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Worksport Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Worksport Ltd reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Worksport Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Worksport Ltd | Soft Tonneau Covers 1.51 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).