Weber Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Weber Inc (WEBR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Weber Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,468M vs 15,478M combined for its competitors (8.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-55.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-11.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Weber Inc generated -41.8% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2022, vs 10.2% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -69.1% net margin compares with 10.4% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Weber Inc accounted for 4.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 8.3% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
WEBR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Weber Inc reported revenue contraction of 41.76 % year on year in Q1 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.19 %.
With a net margin of -69.07 %, Weber Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (10.44 %).
Weber Inc generated 4.58 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 8.32 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Weber Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Weber Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Weber Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Weber Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Appliance & Tool industry grew revenue 5.7% year over year, combined, vs -41.8% for Weber Inc. Weber Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.11% to 1.16%, a loss of 0.95 percentage points.
Weber Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
WEBR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
WEBR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
WEBR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Traeger Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | The Middleby Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Weber Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Weber Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Weber Inc |
443.39 | 1,468.22 |
 Howmet Aerospace Inc |
88,328.00 | 9,273.00 |
 The Middleby Corporation |
6,128.56 | 3,032.43 |
 Vista Outdoor Inc |
2,623.62 | 2,686.37 |
 Traeger Inc |
160.04 | 486.07 |
| SUBTOTAL | 97,683.60 | 16,946.08 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Weber Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Weber Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Weber Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Traeger | Company report | 85% |
| Landmann | Company report | 85% |
| Ziegler & Brown | Company report | 85% |
| Campingaz | Company report | 85% |
| Pit Boss | Company report | 85% |
| Big Green Egg | Company report | 85% |
| Napoleon | Company report | 85% |
| Char-Broil | Company report | 85% |
| Broil King | Company report | 85% |
| Nexgrill | Company report | 85% |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | Company report | 85% |
| The Middleby Corporation | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Weber Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Weber Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | Engine Products 53.76 % |
| The Middleby Corporation | Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group 73.35 % |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | The Kinetic Group 52.80 % |
| Traeger Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Weber Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | 443 | - | - |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | 88,328 | 364,648 | 74,833 |
| The Middleby Corporation | 6,129 | 343,579 | -53,399 |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | 2,624 | 419,745 | 196 |
| Traeger Inc | 160 | 1,122,552 | -260,171 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 97,240 | 376,691 | 32,133 |
Weber Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Weber Inc | Americas 59.13 % |
| The Middleby Corporation | United States and Canada 67.13 % |
| Traeger Inc | North America 89.59 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Weber Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Appliance & Tool industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (11 companies). See the full Appliance & Tool industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.65 % | 24.76 % (avg) | +2.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | -13.26 % | industry median | -4.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -13.45 % | 1.14 % (avg) | -14.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 6.78 % | 2.10 % (avg) | +4.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Weber Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Appliance & Tool industry average (11 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Appliance & Tool industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 7.4x | 12.1x | -4.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 11.1x | - |
| P/B | -1.1x | 5.4x | -6.5x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -38.54 % | -0.56 % (avg) | -37.98 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Weber Inc's Strategic Group Map
Weber Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Weber Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -25.0% and operating margin of -13.3% compares with an average of -7.9% growth and 3.1% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Weber Inc sits below that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Weber Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 6.78 % vs industry average 2.10 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Weber Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Weber Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Weber Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Weber Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-55.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-11.1% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Weber Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | 0.06 | 1.23 | - |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | 0.55 | 2.19 | 0.71 |
| The Middleby Corporation | 0.20 | 2.17 | 0.79 |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | 0.13 | 2.76 | 0.60 |
| Traeger Inc | 0.43 | 3.10 | 2.29 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Weber Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | Q4 2022 | -41.8 % | - |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | Q3 2026 | +31.7 % | +39.3 % |
| The Middleby Corporation | Q2 2026 | -10.4 % | -48.3 % |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | Q3 2024 | -1.5 % | -2.8 % |
| Traeger Inc | Q2 2026 | -17.1 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.5 % | +12.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Weber Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | Q4 2022 | -41.2 % | -5.5 % |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | Q3 2026 | +24.5 % | +146.1 % |
| The Middleby Corporation | Q2 2026 | +12.4 % | -26.8 % |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | Q3 2024 | -2.8 % | +33.2 % |
| Traeger Inc | Q2 2026 | -17.3 % | -74.8 % |
Weber Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | - | - | - |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | 15.63% | 18.58% | 34.95% |
| The Middleby Corporation | - | - | - |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.11% |
| Traeger Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Weber Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Weber Inc | 8.55 | 0.30 |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | 46.68 | 9.53 |
| The Middleby Corporation | - | 2.02 |
| Vista Outdoor Inc | - | 0.98 |
| Traeger Inc | - | 0.33 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 102.72 | 5.76 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.