Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Union Bridge Holdings Limited (UGHL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Union Bridge Holdings Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 123,470M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+42.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-23.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Union Bridge Holdings Limited generated 198.6% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2020, vs 2.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -267.0% net margin compares with 8.7% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Union Bridge Holdings Limited accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
UGHL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2020
Union Bridge Holdings Limited reported revenue growth of 198.55 % year on year in Q3 2020, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 2.84 %.
With a net margin of -266.95 %, Union Bridge Holdings Limited reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.66 %).
Union Bridge Holdings Limited generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited vs. its Competitors, Q3 2020
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Union Bridge Holdings Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Union Bridge Holdings Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Auto & Truck Parts industry grew revenue 4.6% year over year, combined, vs 198.6% for Union Bridge Holdings Limited. Union Bridge Holdings Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 16.70 % (1 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
UGHL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
UGHL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carmax Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Standard Motor Products Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Genuine Parts Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | O Reilly Automotive Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Dorman Products Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Union Bridge Holdings Limited's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Union Bridge Holdings Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | 36.29 | 0.18 |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | 70,520.69 | 18,572.34 |
| Autozone Inc | 47,260.08 | 19,986.40 |
| Genuine Parts Co | 17,309.21 | 25,070.54 |
| Carmax Inc | 7,860.39 | 27,631.34 |
| Autonation Inc | 5,309.30 | 27,448.50 |
| SUBTOTAL | 152,988.26 | 123,470.60 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
Sources: Union Bridge Holdings Limited's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Union Bridge Holdings Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Autozone Inc | Auto Parts Locations 100.00 % |
| Genuine Parts Co | North America Automotive 38.81 % |
| Dorman Products Inc | Light Duty 77.91 % |
| Standard Motor Products Inc | Vehicle Control 36.47 % |
| Motorcar Parts Of America Inc | Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment 93.68 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | 36 | - | - |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | 70,521 | 199,868 | 28,522 |
| Autozone Inc | 47,260 | 153,742 | 19,063 |
| Genuine Parts Co | 17,309 | 385,701 | 504 |
| Carmax Inc | 7,860 | 994,076 | 10,521 |
| Autonation Inc | 5,309 | 1,106,794 | 37,169 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 152,952 | 347,129 | 18,675 |
Sign in to see all peers for Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Genuine Parts Co | United States 64.03 % |
| Dorman Products Inc | United States 91.67 % |
| Standard Motor Products Inc | United States 70.29 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Auto & Truck Parts industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (79 companies). See the full Auto & Truck Parts industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 22.21 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -502.67 % | industry median | -508.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -487.25 % | -1.10 % (avg) | -486.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 6.94 % (avg) | -6.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Union Bridge Holdings Limited's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Union Bridge Holdings Limited is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 6.94 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Union Bridge Holdings Limited's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Union Bridge Holdings Limited's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 33.4 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+42.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 508.0 points below the industry median.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-23.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | 0.01 | 0.16 | - |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | 0.03 | 0.76 | - |
| Autozone Inc | 0.03 | 0.88 | - |
| Genuine Parts Co | - | 1.12 | 1.05 |
| Carmax Inc | 0.27 | 4.29 | 2.95 |
| Autonation Inc | 0.01 | 0.81 | 1.70 |
Sign in to see all peers for Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | Q3 2020 | +198.6 % | - |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.1 % | +7.0 % |
| Autozone Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.4 % | +5.4 % |
| Genuine Parts Co | Q2 2026 | +6.0 % | -10.7 % |
| Carmax Inc | Q3 2026 | +19.5 % | +73.3 % |
| Autonation Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.6 % | +89.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.8 % | +17.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | Q3 2020 | +300.7 % | - |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.1 % | +2.3 % |
| Autozone Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.7 % | -0.1 % |
| Genuine Parts Co | Q2 2026 | +5.9 % | -16.4 % |
| Carmax Inc | Q3 2026 | +19.5 % | -41.3 % |
| Autonation Inc | Q2 2026 | 0.0 % | -11.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | - | - | - |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | 15.79% | 32.79% | - |
| Autozone Inc | 12.38% | 26.27% | - |
| Genuine Parts Co | 0.16% | 0.36% | 0.72% |
| Carmax Inc | 1.10% | 1.16% | 4.76% |
| Autonation Inc | 6.28% | 11.36% | 39.48% |
Sign in to see all peers for Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Union Bridge Holdings Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Union Bridge Holdings Limited | - | 198.74 |
| O Reilly Automotive Inc | 27.10 | 3.80 |
| Autozone Inc | 19.30 | 2.36 |
| Genuine Parts Co | 482.50 | 0.69 |
| Carmax Inc | 26.53 | 0.28 |
| Autonation Inc | 7.34 | 0.19 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 23.04 | 1.24 |
Sign in to see all peers for Union Bridge Holdings Limited.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.