Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Turbo Energy S A's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Turbo Energy S A (TURB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-5.79 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Turbo Energy S A vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 22M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Turbo Energy S A ranks #108 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Turbo Energy S A accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

TURB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Turbo Energy S A generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/TURB/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/TURB/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/TURB/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Turbo Energy S A's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Turbo Energy S A No Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 100% 50% 50% 50%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 17% 67% 44% 20%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Turbo Energy S A100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Turbo Energy S A and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Turbo Energy S A's full market share breakdown »

TURB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

TURB Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Turbo Energy S A's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 6)
57.1%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Turbo Energy S A -79.60 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Turbo Energy S A's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

TURB Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

TURB High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

TURB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

TURB Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

TURB Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

TURB Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Turbo Energy S A's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The solar energy storage market is characterized by competition influenced by regulatory changes, technological advancements, and cost reductions. Key factors in this market include safety, reliability, product performance, customer satisfaction, innovation, comprehensive solutions, costs, stakeholder value, ease of installation, and clarity of value proposition. The company competes with other providers of energy storage systems and software developers specializing in energy storage management. Many competitors have longer histories, incumbency advantages, government influence, and greater capital resources. Few competitors offer integrated solutions that combine battery, inverter, and electrical protections, or advanced software platforms utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning for energy optimization. The company’s offerings include the SUNBOX system and Turbo Energy App, which feature electric vehicle charging capabilities.

Turbo Energy S A's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Enphase Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Tesla Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Solax Power Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Outback Power Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Varta Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
E3/DC Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sonnen Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Senec Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Turbo Energy S A's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License