Tradewinds Universal's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Tradewinds Universal (TRWD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Tradewinds Universal vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-32.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Tradewinds Universal accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TRWD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Tradewinds Universal generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Food Processing industry grew revenue 12.8% year over year, combined, vs 25.0% for Tradewinds Universal. Tradewinds Universal's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
TRWD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TRWD Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Tradewinds Universal's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Tradewinds Universal's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Ynsect SAS | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beta Hatch Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| EnviroFlight Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hexafly | Named by the company | 85% |
| Protifarm Holding NV | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tiny Farms | Named by the company | 85% |
| Armstrong Cricket Farm Georgia | Named by the company | 85% |
| EntoCube Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Haocheng Mealworms Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nutrition Technologies Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rocky Mountain Micro Ranch | Named by the company | 85% |
| Agriprotein (Insect Technology Group Holdings U.K. Ltd.) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Comgraf SAS | Named by the company | 85% |
| F4F SpA | Named by the company | 85% |
| InnovaFeed | Named by the company | 85% |
| Protix | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ynsect | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aspire Food Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| EntomoFarms | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hargol FoodTech | Named by the company | 85% |
| Protenga Pte Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| SFly | Named by the company | 85% |
| All Things Bugs, LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Deli Bugs Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Global Bugs Asia Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| nextProtein S.A.S. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Protix B.V. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Tradewinds Universal's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.