Trio Tech International's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Trio Tech International (TRT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Trio Tech International vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 61M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-1.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Trio Tech International ranks #96 of 143 companies by market capitalization in the Industrial Machinery and Components industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Trio Tech International accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TRT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Trio Tech International generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Industrial Machinery and Components industry grew revenue 12.4% year over year, combined, vs 39.9% for Trio Tech International. Trio Tech International's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Trio Tech International's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trio tech International | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TRT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TRT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TRT Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TRT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Trio Tech International's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Our ability to compete depends on our ability to develop, introduce and sell new products or enhanced versions of existing products on a timely basis and at competitive prices, while reducing our costs.
There are numerous testing laboratories in the areas where we operate that perform a range of testing services similar to those offered. However, due to severe competition in the Southeast Asia testing and burn-in services industry there has been a reduction in the total number of competitors. The existence of competing laboratories and the purchase of testing equipment by semiconductor manufacturers and users are potential threats to our future testing services revenue and earnings. Although these laboratories and new competitors may challenge us at any time, we believe that other factors, including reputation, long service history and strong customer relationships, are instrumental in determining our position in the market.
The distribution segment sells a wide range of equipment to be used for testing
products. As the semiconductor equipment industry is highly competitive, we
offer a one-stop service alternative to customers by complementing our products
with design consultancy and other value-added services.
The principal competitive factors in the manufacturing industry include product
performance, reliability, service and technical support, product improvements,
price, established relationships with customers and product familiarity. We
make every effort to compete favorably with respect to each of these factors.
Although we have competitors for our various products, we believe that our products
compete favorably with respect to each of the above factors. We have been in
business for more than 56 years and have operation facilities mostly located
in Southeast Asia. Those factors combined have helped us to establish and nurture
long-term relationships with customers and will allow us to continue doing business
with our existing customers upon their relocation to other regions where we
have a local presence or are able to reach.
Trio Tech International's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Falcon s Beyond Global Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Trio Tech International's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Trio Tech International's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Trio tech International | Semiconductor Backend Solutions 84.09 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).