Triumph Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Triumph Group Inc (TGI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Triumph Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,262M vs 163,593M combined for tracked competitors (0.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-9.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Triumph Group Inc generated 5.4% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 10.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 7.5% net margin compares with 4.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Triumph Group Inc accounted for 1.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 1.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.34M compares with $0.42M for the peer group (0.8x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TGI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Triumph Group Inc reported revenue growth of 5.38 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.99 %.
With a net margin of 7.54 %, Triumph Group Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (4.93 %).
Triumph Group Inc generated 1.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 1.05 % a year earlier.
Triumph Group Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Triumph Group Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Triumph Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Aerospace & Defense industry grew revenue 13.0% year over year, combined, vs 5.4% for Triumph Group Inc. Triumph Group Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.32% to 0.30%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.
Triumph Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (8) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TGI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TGI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TGI Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cpi Aerostructures Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Plexus Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Ducommun Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Triumph Group Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Triumph Group Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We compete primarily with Tier 1 and Tier 2 aerostructures manufacturers, systems integrators and the manufacturers that supply them, some of which are divisions or subsidiaries of other large companies, in the manufacture of aircraft structures, systems components and subassemblies. OEMs are increasingly focusing on assembly and integration activities while outsourcing more manufacturing and, therefore, are less of a competitive force than in previous years.
Competition for the repair and overhaul of aviation components comes from three
primary sources, some of whom possess greater financial and other resources
than we have: OEMs, major commercial airlines, government support depots and
other independent repair and overhaul companies. Some major commercial airlines
continue to own and operate their own service centers, while others have begun
to sell or outsource their repair and overhaul services to other aircraft operators
or third parties. Large domestic and foreign airlines that provide repair and
overhaul services typically provide these services not only for their own aircraft
but for other airlines as well. OEMs also maintain service centers which provide
repair and overhaul services for the components they manufacture. Many governments
maintain aircraft support depots in their military organizations that maintain
and repair the aircraft they operate. Other independent service organizations
also compete for the repair and overhaul business of other users of aircraft
components.
Participants in the aerospace industry compete primarily on the basis of breadth
of technical capabilities, quality, turnaround time, capacity and price.
Publicly Traded Peers of Triumph Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | 2,025.06 | 1,261.96 |
| The Boeing Company | 145,778.73 | 93,995.00 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199.36 | 21,499.00 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390.27 | 36,130.00 |
| Plexus Corp | 7,231.82 | 4,593.79 |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | 4,645.20 | 6,393.60 |
| SUBTOTAL | 353,978.85 | 164,855.39 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Triumph Group Inc .
Sources: Triumph Group Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Triumph Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Triumph Group Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cpi Aerostructures Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Triumph Group, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Karat Packaging Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Graham Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tat Technologies Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Air Industries Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hanesbrands Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Triumph Group Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Triumph Group Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| The Boeing Company | Commercial Airplanes 47.85 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Diversified Industrial 66.93 % |
| Plexus Corp | Asia Pacific 56.05 % |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | Commercial 73.80 % |
| Ducommun Incorporated | Electronic Systems 56.47 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Triumph Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | 2,025 | 341,440 | 11,059 |
| The Boeing Company | 145,779 | 516,456 | 13,440 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199 | 359,215 | 60,969 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390 | 357,723 | 81,356 |
| Plexus Corp | 7,232 | 229,689 | 9,271 |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | 4,645 | 313,873 | -127,550 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 351,954 | 424,145 | 30,796 |
Triumph Group Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Parker hannifin Corporation | North America 67.21 % |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | UNITED STATES 74.85 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Triumph Group Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 49 companies in Triumph Group Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Triumph Group Inc ranks #0 of 49 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 915, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Boeing Company | 150,084 | 18.81 % |
| 2 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 120,403 | 15.09 % |
| 3 | Northrop Grumman Corp | 72,957 | 9.15 % |
| 4 | Transdigm Group Incorporated | 63,140 | 7.91 % |
| 5 | Garmin Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Rocket Lab Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | L3harris Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Axon Enterprise Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Elbit Systems Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Teledyne Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Triumph Group Inc | 2,044 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Triumph Group Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-07-24.
Triumph Group Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (56 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.55 % | 30.24 % (avg) | +1.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 11.05 % | industry median | +6.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 5.95 % | 4.83 % (avg) | +1.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.51 % | 7.10 % (avg) | -5.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Triumph Group Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Aerospace & Defense industry average (56 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 47.6x | 36.0x | +11.6x |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.9x | 21.5x | +15.4x |
| P/B | -21.1x | 5.2x | -26.3x |
| Return on Equity | -43.77 % | industry aggregate | -48.49 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 13.36 % | 2.69 % (avg) | 10.67 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Triumph Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -12.33 % | 5.30 % | -9.34 % | -31.86 % | -26.52 % | -10.88 % | -0.95 % | -18.35 % |
| Operating Margin | -6.14 % | -10.77 % | -2.96 % | -15.28 % | 1.25 % | 16.08 % | 8.84 % | 9.21 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -4.95 % | -16.04 % | -7.20 % | -40.94 % | 3.49 % | 53.97 % | 22.31 % | 9.66 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | 7.8x | - | 2.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Triumph Group Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Triumph Group Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Triumph Group Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Triumph Group Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 915 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.51 % vs industry average 7.10 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Triumph Group Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Triumph Group Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Triumph Group Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Triumph Group Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Triumph Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 6.2 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 48.5 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 15.0% median pace.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-9.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Triumph Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | 0.51 | 2.41 | - |
| The Boeing Company | 0.08 | 1.17 | 22.01 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 0.08 | 1.16 | 0.65 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0.51 | 1.31 | 2.10 |
| Plexus Corp | 0.18 | 1.54 | 0.04 |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | 0.08 | 0.85 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Triumph Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | Q1 2025 | +5.4 % | -94.8 % |
| The Boeing Company | Q2 2026 | +8.0 % | - |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.8 % | +18.2 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | -6.1 % | +262.4 % |
| Plexus Corp | Q2 2026 | +28.3 % | -4.7 % |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | Q3 2025 | +7.8 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +5.2 % | +184.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Triumph Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | Q1 2025 | +64.9 % | -34.2 % |
| The Boeing Company | Q2 2026 | +9.0 % | +71.7 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.8 % | +32.2 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +39.4 % |
| Plexus Corp | Q2 2026 | +28.2 % | +94.4 % |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | Q3 2025 | +28.5 % | -8.6 % |
Triumph Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | 2.66% | 3.60% | - |
| The Boeing Company | 1.51% | 4.33% | 105.14% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 11.99% | 15.10% | 25.38% |
| Honeywell International Inc | 10.74% | 17.01% | 49.57% |
| Plexus Corp | 5.59% | 10.99% | 12.51% |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Triumph Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Triumph Group Inc | 49.08 | 1.60 |
| The Boeing Company | 67.05 | 1.55 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 34.06 | 5.78 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 8.31 | 1.87 |
| Plexus Corp | 39.14 | 1.57 |
| Spirit Aerosystems Holdings inc | 2.72 | 0.73 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 29.70 | 2.15 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.