Triple Flag Precious Metals's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Triple Flag Precious Metals (TFPM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Triple Flag Precious Metals vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 389M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Triple Flag Precious Metals ranks #30 of 155 companies by market capitalization in the Metal Mining industry, holding 0.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Triple Flag Precious Metals accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TFPM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Triple Flag Precious Metals generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Metal Mining industry grew revenue 21.0% year over year, combined, vs 44.5% for Triple Flag Precious Metals. Triple Flag Precious Metals's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.11% to 0.13%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Triple Flag Precious Metals's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TFPM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TFPM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TFPM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TFPM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Triple Flag Precious Metals's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Triple Flag Precious Metals's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | Named by the company | 85% |
| OR Royalties Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Royal Gold, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Franco-Nevada Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Triple Flag Precious Metals's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.