Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Syla Technologies Co Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Syla Technologies Co Ltd (SYT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2024

Competitors Tracked

Publicly traded peers

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

vs 100.00 % a year ago

Revenue Growth Y/Y

36.38 %

Q4 2024

Net Margin

4.05 %

Q4 2024

Key Findings: Syla Technologies Co Ltd vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+15,250.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Peer revenue share: Syla Technologies Co Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SYT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024

Syla Technologies Co Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SYT/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SYT/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SYT/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

AI Integration via MCP

Connect Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant directly to this data.

For context: the Real Estate Operations industry grew revenue 5.0% year over year, combined, vs 36.4% for Syla Technologies Co Ltd. Syla Technologies Co Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.20% to 0.26%, a gain of 0.06 percentage points.

SYT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SYT Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Syla Technologies Co Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Rimawari-kun is a real estate crowdfunding platform in Japan with over 280,000 registered members, making it the largest in the market according to a Japan Marketing Research Organization survey conducted in October 2024. The platform offers data-driven services utilizing AI, enhances platform functionality, and provides various marketing methods and content development capabilities. It allows individual investors to participate with a minimum investment of ¥10,000 and supports fully online processes from registration to completion. Competitors in the industry include Creal, Owner’s Book, and Rimple.

Syla Technologies Co Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.

Competitor	Basis	Confidence	Active	Sources
SYLA Brain Co., Ltd.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Rimawari-kun	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Creal	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Rimple	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Owner’s Book	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3

Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Syla Technologies Co Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Unlock Commercial Access

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.