Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited (STFS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2024
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2024
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2024
Net Margin
10.30 %
Q4 2024

Key Findings: Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 10M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+502.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited ranks #25 of 33 companies by market capitalization in the Advertising industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

STFS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/STFS/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/STFS/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/STFS/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 0% 100% 100% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 0% 25% 25% 63%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2024

100%market share
  • Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's full market share breakdown »

STFS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

STFS Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 4)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited -56.60 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

STFS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

STFS High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

STFS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

STFS Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a highly competitive marketing industry with numerous domestic and international competitors. It faces competition from both new entrants and established firms that possess design, technological, and manufacturing capabilities comparable to its own. Some competitors may have greater name recognition, higher operating revenues, larger customer bases, longer customer relationships, and superior financial, technical, personnel, and marketing resources. Inability to effectively compete for existing and prospective customers may negatively impact the company's financial condition and operating results.

Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Mobvista Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
China Kingway Live Events Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Beijing MIAGE Advertising Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Beijing Aspiration Advertising Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hylink Digital Solutions Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Blue Strategy Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Beijing GPJ Market Consulting Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Star Fashion Culture Holdings Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.