Scully Royalty Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Scully Royalty Ltd (SRL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Scully Royalty Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 27M vs 146,481M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+0.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Profitability: Its -57.4% net margin compares with 12.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Scully Royalty Ltd ranks #101 of 155 companies by market capitalization in the Metal Mining industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Scully Royalty Ltd accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SRL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
With a net margin of -57.41 %, Scully Royalty Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.03 %).
Scully Royalty Ltd generated 0.07 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
Scully Royalty Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Scully Royalty Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Scully Royalty Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SRL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SRL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corning Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Revvity Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Agilent Technologies inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Danaher Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Scully Royalty Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Scully Royalty Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | 77.24 | 27.04 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 251,760.60 | 46,336.00 |
| Danaher Corporation | 160,858.71 | 25,107.00 |
| Corning Inc | 132,615.00 | 16,964.00 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390.27 | 36,130.00 |
| Agilent Technologies inc | 49,584.43 | 7,372.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 691,500.58 | 146,507.95 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Scully Royalty Ltd .
Sources: Scully Royalty Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Scully Royalty Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Clinical Research 19.98 % |
| Danaher Corporation | Diagnostics 39.36 % |
| Corning Inc | Optical Communications 40.55 % |
| Agilent Technologies inc | Agilent CrossLab 41.36 % |
| Baxter International Inc | Medical Products and Therapies 47.57 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Scully Royalty Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | 77 | - | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 251,761 | 370,688 | 55,912 |
| Danaher Corporation | 160,859 | 418,450 | 66,733 |
| Corning Inc | 132,615 | 252,440 | 30,863 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 67,390 | 357,723 | 81,356 |
| Agilent Technologies inc | 49,584 | 407,293 | 79,558 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 691,423 | 348,871 | 51,884 |
Sign in to see all peers for Scully Royalty Ltd .
Scully Royalty Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | North America 51.27 % |
| Danaher Corporation | North America 39.49 % |
| Agilent Technologies inc | Americas 41.63 % |
| Baxter International Inc | Non-US 1.44 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 131 companies in Scully Royalty Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Scully Royalty Ltd ranks #101 of 131 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.01 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 751, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhp Group Limited | 211,645 | 15.27 % |
| 2 | Southern Copper Corp | 166,346 | 12.00 % |
| 3 | Rio Tinto Plc | 152,559 | 11.01 % |
| 4 | Newmont Corporation | 124,220 | 8.96 % |
| 5 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Franco nevada Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Anglogold Ashanti Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cameco Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 101 | Scully Royalty Ltd | 79 | 0.01 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Scully Royalty Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96 | Metals Royalty Co Inc | 179 | - |
| 97 | Drdgold Limited | 148 | -7.67 % |
| 98 | Platinum Group Metals Ltd | 134 | -45.49 % |
| 99 | Paramount Gold Nevada Corp | 101 | 5.93 % |
| 100 | U s Goldmining Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 101 | Scully Royalty Ltd | 79 | -6.99 % |
| 102 | Nexmetals Mining Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 103 | Westwater Resources inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 104 | Arras Minerals Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 105 | Vale s a | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 106 | Solitario Resources Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Scully Royalty Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Scully Royalty Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Scully Royalty Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Scully Royalty Ltd falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 33.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 751 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Scully Royalty Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Scully Royalty Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Scully Royalty Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Scully Royalty Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 33.6% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (33.30 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | 0.50 | 4.56 | 0.00 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 0.32 | 1.62 | 0.78 |
| Danaher Corporation | - | 1.73 | 0.40 |
| Corning Inc | 0.25 | 1.64 | 0.68 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0.51 | 1.31 | 2.10 |
| Agilent Technologies inc | 0.77 | 2.02 | 1.02 |
Sign in to see all peers for Scully Royalty Ltd .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | Q4 2024 | -33.6 % | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +7.6 % |
| Danaher Corporation | Q2 2026 | +5.5 % | +56.8 % |
| Corning Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.6 % | +21.8 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | -6.1 % | +262.4 % |
| Agilent Technologies inc | Q2 2026 | +8.1 % | +7.7 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +5.1 % | +100.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Scully Royalty Ltd .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Scully Royalty Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | Q4 2024 | -61.7 % | -48.9 % |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Q2 2026 | +142.5 % | +53.1 % |
| Danaher Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.0 % | +8.5 % |
| Corning Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.5 % | +37.0 % |
| Honeywell International Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +39.4 % |
| Agilent Technologies inc | Q2 2026 | -1.6 % | -22.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Scully Royalty Ltd .
Scully Royalty Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | - | - | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 6.36% | 7.71% | 13.37% |
| Danaher Corporation | 4.72% | 5.44% | 7.66% |
| Corning Inc | 6.63% | 8.04% | 16.66% |
| Honeywell International Inc | 10.74% | 17.01% | 49.57% |
| Agilent Technologies inc | 10.97% | 19.84% | 41.99% |
Sign in to see all peers for Scully Royalty Ltd .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Scully Royalty Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Scully Royalty Ltd | - | 2.86 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 36.52 | 5.43 |
| Danaher Corporation | 40.45 | 6.41 |
| Corning Inc | 69.21 | 7.82 |
| Honeywell International Inc | 8.31 | 1.87 |
| Agilent Technologies inc | 34.56 | 6.73 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 31.77 | 4.72 |
Sign in to see all peers for Scully Royalty Ltd .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.