Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Sportradar Group Ag's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Sportradar Group Ag (SRAD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
1
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
68.36 %
vs 70.82 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
16.57 %
Peers: 30.96 %
Net Margin
7.78 %
Peers: -16.68 %

Key Findings: Sportradar Group Ag vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,458M vs 669M combined for tracked competitors (68.5% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+296.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+299.6%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Sportradar Group Ag generated 16.6% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 31.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 7.8% net margin compares with -16.7% for the peer group.
  • Scale: Sportradar Group Ag ranks #23 of 92 companies by market capitalization in the Internet Services & Social Media industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Sportradar Group Ag accounted for 68.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 70.8% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.32M compares with $1.34M for the peer group (0.2x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SRAD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Sportradar Group Ag reported revenue growth of 16.57 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 30.96 %.

With a net margin of 7.78 %, Sportradar Group Ag achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-16.68 %).

Sportradar Group Ag generated 68.36 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 70.82 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SRAD/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SRAD/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SRAD/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Sportradar Group Ag vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Revenue growth, year on year

Sportradar Group Ag +16.6 %
Competitors combined +31.0 %

Net margin

Sportradar Group Ag +7.8 %
Competitors combined -16.7 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Sportradar Group Ag +296.2 %
Competitors combined +299.6 %

TTM net margin

Sportradar Group Ag +7.8 %
Competitors combined -16.7 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Sportradar Group Ag and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Sportradar Group Ag $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Sportradar Group Ag's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Internet Services & Social Media industry grew revenue 19.3% year over year, combined, vs 16.6% for Sportradar Group Ag. Sportradar Group Ag's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.46% to 0.45%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.

Sportradar Group Ag's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Sportradar Group Ag Yes Yes Yes No
Competitors combined (1) 0% 100% 100% 0%
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 33% 100% 100% 50%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 56% 78% 56% 57%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

68.4%market share
  • Sportradar Group Ag68.4%
  • Competitors combined31.6%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Sportradar Group Ag and its 1 tracked competitors.

See Sportradar Group Ag's full market share breakdown »

SRAD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SRAD Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Sportradar Group Ag's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(0 of 1)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 2)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(2 of 10)
28.6%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Sportradar Group Ag -59.50 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (1) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sportradar Group Ag's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SRAD Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SRAD High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 4) Percent change over the selected range

SRAD Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

SRAD Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

SRAD Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SRAD Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Genius Sports Limited 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Sportradar Group Ag's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Sportradar Group Ag's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company utilizes a broad network, extensive data collection infrastructure, and a large historical data set to maintain competitive advantages. Its primary real-time data capture methods include computer vision technology, in-venue coverage by trained data journalists and scouts, and television coverage through streamed and broadcast TV feeds. The company employs Scout Applications for real-time data collection, used by rights holders or competitions such as the Universal Tennis Rating (UTR) Pro Tennis Tour, the European Table Tennis Union (ETTU), and the European Handball Federation (EHF). Additionally, it offers Competition Management services with integrated live data collection solutions delivered via APIs to multiple leagues and federations. Competitors identified in filings include the European Handball Federation (EHF), European Table Tennis Union (ETTU), Sportradar, and the Universal Tennis Rating (UTR) Pro Tennis Tour.

Publicly Traded Peers of Sportradar Group Ag

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Sportradar Group Ag - 1,458.46 113.43 4,582
Genius Sports Limited 1,459.76 669.49 -111.58 500
SUBTOTAL 1,459.76 2,127.95 1.85 5,082

Sources: Sportradar Group Ag's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Sportradar Group Ag versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Sportradar Group Ag's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
BetConstruct Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
IMG Arena Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Genius Sports Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
European Table Tennis Union (ETTU) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Universal Tennis Rating (UTR) Pro Tennis Tour Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
CPP Investments Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Stats Perform Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
betandwin Interactive Entertainment Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Fox Sports Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
European Handball Federation (EHF) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
TCV Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Sportradar Group Ag's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Sportradar Group Ag's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Sportradar Group Ag - 318,303 24,755
Genius Sports Limited 1,460 1,338,978 -223,162
PEERS TOTAL 1,460 1,338,978 -223,162

Sportradar Group Ag's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Genius Sports Limited Americas 47.19 % Europe 46.65 % Rest Of The World 6.15 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Sportradar Group Ag's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 75 companies in Sportradar Group Ag's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Sportradar Group Ag ranks #23 of 75 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.15 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 6,288, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Meta Platforms Inc 1,860,812 79.05 %
2 Applovin Corporation 97,884 4.16 %
3 Nebius Group n v 58,423 2.48 %
4 Gds Holdings Limited 51,360 2.18 %
5 Rentokil Initial Plc 1,234 5.2%
6 Thomson Reuters Corporation 1,234 5.2%
7 Zoom Communications Inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Digitalocean Holdings Inc 1,234 5.2%
9 Flutter Entertainment Plc 1,234 5.2%
10 Gartner Inc 1,234 5.2%
23 Sportradar Group Ag 3,642 0.15 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Sportradar Group Ag's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-30.

Sportradar Group Ag's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
18 Trade Desk Inc 5,719 -75.59 % -36.84 % 1.45 -2.30
19 Niq Global Intelligence Plc 5,019 9.94 % 58.32 % - 0.32
20 Wix com Ltd 4,151 -60.31 % 42.40 % 1.13 -0.91
21 Premier Inc 4,100 164.00 % -1.97 % 0.40 1.75
22 Magnite Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
23 Sportradar Group Ag 3,642 -59.52 % -27.11 % 0.89 -1.48
24 Grindr Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
25 Trump Media and Technology Group Corp 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
26 Mcgraw Hill Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
27 Cf Acquisition Corp Vi 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
28 Doubleverify Holdings Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Sportradar Group Ag's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-30. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Sportradar Group Ag's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Internet Services & Social Media industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (114 companies). See the full Internet Services & Social Media industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 85.20 % 52.76 % (avg) +32.4 pp
Operating Margin 41.13 % industry median +40.9 pp
EBITDA Margin 33.91 % 8.59 % (avg) +25.3 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.38 % 6.23 % (avg) -5.8 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Sportradar Group Ag's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 202320242025
Revenue Growth 20.19 %26.09 %16.57 %
Operating Margin 8.91 %44.01 %41.13 %
Return on Invested Capital 2.83 %17.08 %16.19 %
P/E 79.7x--

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Sportradar Group Ag's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Sportradar Group Ag's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Sportradar Group Ag is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)Sportradar Group AgMETAYALAINFOGOOGGOOGLBZFDSTRI

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Sportradar Group Ag's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Relative market share (vs Sportradar Group Ag's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Sportradar Group Ag

Sportradar Group Ag falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 7.8% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Meta Platforms Inc alone holds 79% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.

Sportradar Group Ag's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry Low Industry HHI of 6,288 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.38 % vs industry average 6.23 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Sportradar Group Ag's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Sportradar Group Ag's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Sportradar Group Ag's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective Sportradar Group Ag
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Sportradar Group Ag falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Sportradar Group Ag's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 40.9 points above the industry median.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+296.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

  • Return on equity 18.6 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

  • Industry dominated by Meta Platforms Inc , holding 79.05 % of industry market cap.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Sportradar Group Ag's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Sportradar Group Ag 0.64 1.17 0.07 0.43
Genius Sports Limited 0.80 1.56 - 0.59

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Sportradar Group Ag's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Sportradar Group AgQ4 2025+21.8 %+21.8 %+211.9 %+211.9 %
Genius Sports LimitedQ4 2025+31.0 %+31.0 %--
PEERS TOTAL+24.6 %+24.6 %--

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Sportradar Group Ag's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Sportradar Group AgQ4 2025+13.6 %+13.6 %-4.6 %-4.6 %
Genius Sports LimitedQ4 2025+34.9 %+34.9 %-83.1 %-83.1 %

Sportradar Group Ag's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Sportradar Group Ag3.36%4.32%9.88%13.28-
Genius Sports Limited---4.931,815.66

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Sportradar Group Ag's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Sportradar Group Ag93.83----
Genius Sports Limited-2.18-10.052.01
PEERS AVERAGE790.140.692.730.78

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License