Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Synergy Chc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Synergy Chc (SNYR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-40.95 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-244.28 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Synergy Chc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 33M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-25.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Synergy Chc ranks #23 of 37 companies by market capitalization in the Legal Cannabis industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Synergy Chc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SNYR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Synergy Chc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SNYR/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SNYR/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SNYR/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Legal Cannabis industry grew revenue 34.7% year over year, combined, vs -41.0% for Synergy Chc. Synergy Chc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.43% to 0.19%, a loss of 0.24 percentage points.

Synergy Chc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Synergy Chc Corp No No No No
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 100% 100% 100% 50%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 0% 60% 40% 67%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 71.40 % (5 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Synergy Chc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Synergy Chc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Synergy Chc's full market share breakdown »

SNYR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SNYR Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Synergy Chc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 3)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(0 of 4)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Synergy Chc Corp - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Synergy Chc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SNYR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SNYR High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

SNYR Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

SNYR Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 6) Percent change over the selected range

SNYR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SNYR Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Synergy Chc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The energy ready-to-drink (RTD) category has shifted from traditional energy products by Red Bull and Monster to performance-oriented offerings like Reign and C4 Performance, and currently to dual-benefit energy products. FOCUSfactor has introduced a focus plus energy RTD that combines vitamins, cognitive nutrients, and caffeine in a zero sugar, low calorie formulation. The company utilizes established retailer relationships to expand its RTD product line and targets both older supplement consumers and a younger demographic. In the brain health supplement market, FOCUSfactor operates amid a fragmented landscape with global and domestic competitors, presenting opportunities for market share growth. The Flat Tummy brand competes in the weight management and wellbeing market, which is expanding due to demographic trends and increased consumer attention to obesity reduction. Competitors mentioned include C4 Performance, Monster, Red Bull, and Reign.

Synergy Chc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
C4 Performance Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Reign Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Monster Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Red Bull Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Synergy Chc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Synergy Chc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Synergy Chc Corp Nutraceuticals 81.26 % Consumer Goods 18.36 % Beverages 0.38 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License