Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Synchronoss Technologies Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Synchronoss Technologies Inc (SNCR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-2.24 %
Q3 2025
Net Margin
13.84 %
Q3 2025

Key Findings: Synchronoss Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 171M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-1.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Synchronoss Technologies Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SNCR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2025

Synchronoss Technologies Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SNCR/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SNCR/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SNCR/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 1.3% year over year, combined, vs -2.2% for Synchronoss Technologies Inc. Synchronoss Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.03%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Synchronoss Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Synchronoss Technologies Inc No Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (7) 100% 86% 86% 14%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 16.70 % (1 of 6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2025

100%market share
  • Synchronoss Technologies Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Synchronoss Technologies Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Synchronoss Technologies Inc's full market share breakdown »

SNCR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SNCR Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Synchronoss Technologies Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(2 of 6)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Synchronoss Technologies Inc -12.70 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Synchronoss Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SNCR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SNCR High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

SNCR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SNCR Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Synchronoss Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The Personal Cloud market includes OTT service and platform providers such as Apple, Google, Dropbox, Box, Microsoft, and Amazon, which offer personal cloud services integrated with their technology platforms. Synchronoss provides operator-grade white label solutions, differentiating itself from these providers. Another segment consists of white label platform providers like Funambol, which deliver platform-independent personal cloud services aimed at second and third tier regional operators, typically using low-risk, revenue share business models and generally not competing with Tier 1 global operators. Synchronoss offers products designed to synchronize subscribers, systems, networks, and content, drawing on over 20 years of experience in carrier-grade solutions. Competitors identified include Amazon, Apple, Box, Dropbox, Funambol, Google, Microsoft, and Synchronoss.

Synchronoss Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Amazon Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
GE Smallworld Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Box Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Dropbox Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Neustar Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Apple Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Google Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
3-GIS Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Funambol Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
One Drive Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bentley Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Microsoft Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Synchronoss Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Synchronoss Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Synchronoss Technologies Inc Reportable 100.00 % - -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License