Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Smartkem Inc's Competitiveness

Name: Smartkem Inc Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Smartkem Inc (SMTK) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SMTK/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SMTK/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SMTK/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

AI Integration via MCP

Connect Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant directly to this data.

Smartkem Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
Smartkem Inc	-	-	-	Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1)
Similar-Size Competitors (6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

SMTK Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SMTK Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Smartkem Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.

High-Confidence
(1 of 1)

Similar-Size
(1 of 5)

Entity	TTM Share Price Return (group: median)	vs U.S.A. 500
Smartkem Inc	-6.10 %	Underperformed
Competitors combined (0)	40.4%	63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0)	40.4%	63.2%

Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Smartkem Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Unlock Commercial Access

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SMTK Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SMTK High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

SMTK Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

SMTK Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 6) Percent change over the selected range

Smartkem Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in highly competitive markets characterized by rapid technological changes, where existing and new entrants may introduce competing products that could impact its business and operating results. Competitors such as BASF SE, Merck KGaA, and Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. have developed organic inks using polymeric semiconductors or polycrystalline semiconductors, each presenting trade-offs in mobility and uniformity. These competitors utilize polymeric semiconductors that process effectively but exhibit lower mobility compared to the company's TRUFLEX® materials. The company asserts that its proprietary technology provides higher mobility and improved processability relative to these competitors' technologies.

Competitor data is not yet available for Smartkem Inc.

Smartkem Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.

Competitor	Basis	Confidence	Active	Sources
Merck KGaA	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
BASF SE	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Parc Investments, Inc.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Laffin Acquisition Corp.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3
Patricia Acquisition Corp.	Named by the company	85%	2022 to 2026	3

Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Smartkem Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Unlock Commercial Access

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Smartkem Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).

Company	Largest Segment	2nd Segment	3rd Segment
Smartkem Inc	Semiconductor materials segment 100.00 %	-	-

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).