Horizon Kinetics Holding's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Horizon Kinetics Holding (SLGD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Horizon Kinetics Holding vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 71M vs 276,480M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+0.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Horizon Kinetics Holding generated -3.7% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 4.3% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -593.2% net margin compares with 15.5% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Horizon Kinetics Holding accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.88M compares with $0.62M for the peer group (1.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SLGD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Horizon Kinetics Holding reported revenue contraction of 3.66 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 4.29 %.
With a net margin of -593.23 %, Horizon Kinetics Holding reported lower profitability than its competitors (15.54 %).
Horizon Kinetics Holding generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.03 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Horizon Kinetics Holding vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Horizon Kinetics Holding reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Horizon Kinetics Holding and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Horizon Kinetics Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Investment Services industry grew revenue -2.9% year over year, combined, vs -3.7% for Horizon Kinetics Holding. Horizon Kinetics Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (16) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SLGD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SLGD Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sealed Air Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Newell Brands Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Johnson and Johnson | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Church and Dwight Co Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Colgate palmolive Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Horizon Kinetics Holding's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation |
19.75 | 71.17 |
 Johnson and Johnson |
676,352.29 | 99,335.00 |
 Procter and Gamble Co |
398,150.88 | 87,922.00 |
 Ecolab Inc |
84,821.83 | 17,679.70 |
 Colgate palmolive Company |
77,219.03 | 21,284.00 |
 Kimberly clark Corporation |
36,139.72 | 16,582.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,327,294.21 | 339,011.16 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Horizon Kinetics Holding reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Chemomab Therapeutics Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Virpax Pharmaceuticals Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Church & Dwight | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Horizon Kinetics Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Johnson and Johnson | Oncology 29.93 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Fabric & Home Care 35.25 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Water Services 51.14 % |
| Colgate palmolive Company | Oral, Personal and Home Care 77.56 % |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | North America (NA) 66.23 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | 20 | 878,667 | 528,852 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 676,352 | 705,504 | 114,311 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 398,151 | 845,404 | 154,750 |
| Ecolab Inc | 84,822 | 368,327 | 43,650 |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 77,219 | 633,452 | 63,899 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 36,140 | 460,611 | 55,250 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,327,274 | 619,109 | 94,245 |
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Johnson and Johnson | United States 58.90 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Non-US 52.05 % |
| Sealed Air Corp | Americas 64.01 % |
| Wd 40 Company | Non-US 65.69 % |
| Newell Brands Inc | North America 66.36 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 88 companies in Horizon Kinetics Holding's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Horizon Kinetics Holding ranks #0 of 88 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 580, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan Stanley | 284,679 | 12.54 % |
| 2 | The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 263,989 | 11.62 % |
| 3 | Blackrock Inc | 194,098 | 8.55 % |
| 4 | Schwab Charles Corp | 159,101 | 7.01 % |
| 5 | Futu Holdings Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Cme Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Blackstone Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Kkr and co inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | 20 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Horizon Kinetics Holding's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2024-08-01.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Investment Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (142 companies). See the full Investment Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 21.10 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.52 % | 22.65 % (avg) | -22.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 3.62 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -12.16 % | -23.23 % | 9.48 % | 7.50 % | -52.61 % | -60.94 % | 360.64 % | 152.35 % |
| Operating Margin | 7.86 % | -4.75 % | -7.23 % | -26.45 % | -52.41 % | -67.46 % | - | 31.41 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.35 % | -2.80 % | -4.32 % | -19.95 % | -49.03 % | -1.09 % | 2.88 % | 0.97 % |
| P/E | 14.5x | - | - | - | - | 0.3x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 580 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Horizon Kinetics Holding's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Horizon Kinetics Holding falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 15.7 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | 41.15 | 10.36 | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | 0.36 | 1.04 | 0.60 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 0.26 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.29 | 1.26 | 1.72 |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 0.22 | 0.96 | 15.33 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 0.10 | 0.80 | 4.08 |
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | Q2 2026 | -3.7 % | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | Q3 2026 | +5.9 % | -95.9 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q3 2026 | +4.0 % | -1.0 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q3 2026 | +16.4 % | -6.5 % |
| Colgate palmolive Company | Q3 2026 | +4.6 % | -2.0 % |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | Q2 2026 | +0.6 % | -31.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +3.4 % | -4.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | Q3 2026 | +10.9 % | +17.7 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q3 2026 | +7.3 % | +13.8 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q3 2026 | +14.2 % | +19.8 % |
| Colgate palmolive Company | Q3 2026 | +2.6 % | -13.5 % |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | Q2 2026 | -4.5 % | +78.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | 2.05% | 2.05% | 11.48% |
| Johnson and Johnson | 8.06% | 10.53% | 19.55% |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 12.54% | 17.47% | 29.71% |
| Ecolab Inc | 7.57% | 7.61% | 20.76% |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 12.92% | 20.06% | 417.50% |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 11.41% | 19.70% | 115.54% |
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Horizon Kinetics Holding's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | 0.09 | 0.28 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 41.79 | 6.81 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 25.02 | 4.53 |
| Ecolab Inc | 41.02 | 4.80 |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 37.79 | 3.63 |
| Kimberly clark Corporation | 18.57 | 2.18 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 25.70 | 3.92 |
Sign in to see all peers for Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.