Safe And Green Development's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Safe And Green Development (SGD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Safe And Green Development vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 11M vs 119,582M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+53.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+0.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Safe And Green Development generated 203.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -6.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -188.4% net margin compares with 12.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Safe And Green Development accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.29M compares with $1.67M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SGD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Safe And Green Development reported revenue growth of 203.45 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -6.04 %.
With a net margin of -188.43 %, Safe And Green Development reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.91 %).
Safe And Green Development generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Safe And Green Development vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Safe And Green Development and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Safe And Green Development's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Environmental Services industry grew revenue -1.2% year over year, combined, vs 203.5% for Safe And Green Development. Safe And Green Development's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Safe And Green Development's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | - | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 42.90 % (3 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SGD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SGD Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SGD Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zions Bancorporation National Association | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Toll Brothers Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Masco Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Pultegroup Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Hovnanian Enterprises Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Safe And Green Development's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Safe And Green Development's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Safe And Green Development Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | 0.65 | 11.07 |
| D r Horton Inc | 39,587.45 | 33,349.80 |
| Pultegroup Inc | 22,707.96 | 16,407.08 |
| Lennar Corp | 19,888.10 | 32,737.24 |
| Nvr Inc | 17,600.76 | 9,529.53 |
| Masco Corporation | 14,043.36 | 7,679.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 139,725.07 | 127,272.30 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Safe And Green Development Corp.
Sources: Safe And Green Development Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Safe And Green Development Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Safe And Green Development's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Majestic | Named by the company | 85% |
| Resource Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Resource Group | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Safe And Green Development's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Safe And Green Development's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | Technology 99.84 % |
| D r Horton Inc | HomeBuildingOps 94.14 % |
| Pultegroup Inc | Florida 26.99 % |
| Lennar Corp | Homebuilding West 34.85 % |
| Nvr Inc | Home Building 97.54 % |
| Masco Corporation | Plumbing Products 66.93 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
Safe And Green Development's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | 1 | 291,416 | -480,325 |
| D r Horton Inc | 39,587 | 2,325,486 | 215,808 |
| Pultegroup Inc | 22,708 | 2,521,838 | 293,029 |
| Lennar Corp | 19,888 | 2,612,291 | 130,806 |
| Nvr Inc | 17,601 | 1,512,624 | 181,162 |
| Masco Corporation | 14,043 | 426,611 | 49,333 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 139,724 | 1,669,438 | 188,742 |
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
Safe And Green Development's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Masco Corporation | North America 79.90 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Safe And Green Development's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 14 companies in Safe And Green Development's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Safe And Green Development ranks #0 of 14 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,625, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waste Management Inc | 83,009 | 36.98 % |
| 2 | Republic Services Inc | 65,331 | 29.10 % |
| 3 | Waste Connections Inc | 39,539 | 17.61 % |
| 4 | Clean Harbors inc | 16,528 | 7.36 % |
| 5 | Gfl Environmental Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Casella Waste Systems Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Perma Fix Environmental Services Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Athena Technology Acquisition Corp Ii | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Quest Resource Holding Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Avalon Holdings Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Safe And Green Development Corp | 1 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Safe And Green Development's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-12-18.
Safe And Green Development's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Environmental Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (29 companies). See the full Environmental Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 32.11 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -94.93 % | industry median | -98.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -23.43 % | -12.17 % (avg) | -11.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 8.71 % (avg) | -8.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Safe And Green Development's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Safe And Green Development's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Safe And Green Development is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Safe And Green Development's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,625 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 8.71 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Safe And Green Development's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Safe And Green Development's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Safe And Green Development's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Safe And Green Development falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Safe And Green Development's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+53.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 98.3 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 550.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Waste Management Inc, holding 36.98 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Safe And Green Development's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | 0.02 | 0.19 | 9.61 |
| D r Horton Inc | 0.64 | 6.12 | 0.19 |
| Pultegroup Inc | 0.70 | 6.33 | 0.13 |
| Lennar Corp | 1.30 | 8.87 | 0.22 |
| Nvr Inc | 2.18 | 5.97 | 0.19 |
| Masco Corporation | 0.31 | 1.81 | 28.41 |
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Safe And Green Development's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | Q2 2026 | +12,284.8 % | - |
| D r Horton Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.0 % | -11.1 % |
| Pultegroup Inc | Q2 2026 | -9.6 % | -22.4 % |
| Lennar Corp | Q2 2026 | -5.2 % | -36.0 % |
| Nvr Inc | Q2 2026 | -10.5 % | -29.1 % |
| Masco Corporation | Q1 2026 | +6.5 % | +15.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -5.4 % | +2.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Safe And Green Development's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | Q2 2026 | +30,512.7 % | - |
| D r Horton Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.9 % | -8.7 % |
| Pultegroup Inc | Q2 2026 | +4,908.2 % | -13.4 % |
| Lennar Corp | Q2 2026 | - | +23.9 % |
| Nvr Inc | Q2 2026 | +83.2 % | -25.9 % |
| Masco Corporation | Q1 2026 | +6.5 % | +6.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
Safe And Green Development's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | - | - | - |
| D r Horton Inc | 8.66% | 9.84% | 12.62% |
| Pultegroup Inc | 10.54% | 11.33% | 14.73% |
| Lennar Corp | 4.81% | 5.06% | 7.39% |
| Nvr Inc | 19.89% | 21.96% | 31.02% |
| Masco Corporation | 16.89% | 23.14% | 843.71% |
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Safe And Green Development's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Safe And Green Development Corp | - | 0.06 |
| D r Horton Inc | 13.46 | 1.19 |
| Pultegroup Inc | 12.23 | 1.38 |
| Lennar Corp | 13.01 | 0.61 |
| Nvr Inc | 16.34 | 1.85 |
| Masco Corporation | 17.12 | 1.83 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 9.72 | 1.10 |
Sign in to see all peers for Safe And Green Development Corp.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.