Fang Holdings Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Fang Holdings Ltd (SFUN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Fang Holdings Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 31M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Fang Holdings Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 55.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.03M compares with $0.35M for the peer group (0.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SFUN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Fang Holdings Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 55.48 % a year earlier.
For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 8.2% year over year, combined, vs -38.7% for Fang Holdings Ltd. Fang Holdings Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.04% to 0.02%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SFUN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fangdd Network Group Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Fang Holdings Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Fang Holdings Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | 25.30 | 30.68 |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | 148.87 | 316.85 |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | 3.43 | 50.74 |
| SUBTOTAL | 177.61 | 398.27 |
Sources: Fang Holdings Ltd's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Fang Holdings Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Fang Holdings Ltd reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Leju Holdings Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Fang Holdings Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Fang Holdings Ltd reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | 25 | 30,707 | -28,785 |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | 149 | 1,608,398 | -283,110 |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | 3 | 58,590 | -13,988 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 152 | 345,808 | -63,863 |
Fang Holdings Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 148 companies in Fang Holdings Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Fang Holdings Ltd ranks #0 of 148 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 548, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automatic Data Processing Inc | 118,161 | 16.87 % |
| 2 | Infosys Limited | 51,254 | 7.32 % |
| 3 | Workday Inc | 48,808 | 6.97 % |
| 4 | Zscaler Inc | 33,287 | 4.75 % |
| 5 | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Reddit Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Verisign Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Verisk Analytics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Samsara Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Wipro Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Fang Holdings Ltd | 253 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Fang Holdings Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2022-05-17.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (257 companies). See the full Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 81.39 % | 43.46 % (avg) | +37.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | -71.79 % | 2.55 % (avg) | -74.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 15.65 % | 5.83 % (avg) | +9.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -63.37 % | -37.85 % | -38.67 % |
| Operating Margin | -49.67 % | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.65 % | -17.23 % | -3.20 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 548 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 15.65 % vs industry average 5.83 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Fang Holdings Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Fang Holdings Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Fang Holdings Ltd falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Fang Holdings Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 15.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | 0.31 | 1.40 | 0.59 |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | 0.54 | 0.84 | - |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | 0.14 | 1.86 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | Q4 2024 | -38.7 % | - |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | Q4 2023 | -7.7 % | - |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | Q4 2025 | +9.2 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -9.4 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Fang Holdings Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | Q4 2024 | -27.8 % | +390.5 % |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | Q4 2023 | -24.5 % | -66.9 % |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | Q4 2025 | +0.5 % | +198.7 % |
Fang Holdings Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | - | - | - |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | - | - | - |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Fang Holdings Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Ltd | - | 0.82 |
| Leju Holdings Ltd | - | 0.47 |
| Fangdd Network Group Ltd | - | 0.07 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.45 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.