Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Scilex Holding's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Scilex Holding (SCLX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-22.78 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-1,504.66 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Scilex Holding vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 32M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Scilex Holding ranks #117 of 165 companies by market capitalization in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Scilex Holding accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SCLX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Scilex Holding generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SCLX/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SCLX/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SCLX/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals industry grew revenue 20.7% year over year, combined, vs -22.8% for Scilex Holding. Scilex Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.02%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.

Scilex Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Scilex Holding Company No No No -
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 100% 67% 0% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 25% 67% 33% 29%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 28.60 % (2 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Scilex Holding100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Scilex Holding and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Scilex Holding's full market share breakdown »

SCLX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SCLX Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Scilex Holding's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 10)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Scilex Holding Company 45.90 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Scilex Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SCLX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SCLX High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

SCLX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

SCLX Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

SCLX Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SCLX Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Scilex Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the pain management market, competing with prescription, generic, and over-the-counter topical lidocaine patches. Competitors include Lidoderm and generic lidocaine patches produced by Teva, Mylan, and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. The company cites its novel formulations, patents, and trade secrets as barriers to new entrants. It maintains supply agreements and manufacturing partnerships with Genzyme, an affiliate of Sanofi, and Tulex Pharmaceuticals Inc. The market is characterized by significant competition from pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and specialty pharmaceutical companies with established drug pipelines, capital resources, and research and development capabilities.

Scilex Holding's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Lidoderm Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sanofi Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mylan Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Genzyme Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Teva Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Scilex Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License