Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc (RYAM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,466M vs 24,651M combined for tracked competitors (5.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+11.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc generated 10.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 8.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -8.7% net margin compares with 8.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc ranks #7 of 14 companies by market capitalization in the Paper & Paper Products industry, holding 0.8% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc accounted for 5.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 5.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.63M compares with $0.62M for the peer group (1.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RYAM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc reported revenue growth of 10.61 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 8.84 %.
With a net margin of -8.69 %, Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.93 %).
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc generated 5.17 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 5.09 % a year earlier.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Paper & Paper Products industry grew revenue 4.3% year over year, combined, vs 10.6% for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.98% to 1.04%, a gain of 0.06 percentage points.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | No | No | No | - |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RYAM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RYAM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
RYAM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quanex Building Products Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Ashland Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Photronics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Albemarle Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Quaker Chemical Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Cellulose Specialties
Significant intellectual property, capital investment and technical expertise
are needed to design and manufacture customized cellulose specialties fibers
to exacting customer specifications. The product must be formulated to achieve
the desired characteristics including parameters for purity, viscosity, brightness,
reactivity and other physical properties. Product qualification time can be
lengthy, extending six to twenty-four months. Resulting customer relationships
are typically long-term, based on an understanding of our customers’ production
processes and technical expertise which we utilize to solve customers’
production issues and support new product development. Further, establishing
a production line and obtaining the necessary production technologies requires
substantial capital and ongoing maintenance expenditures.
Product performance, technical service and price are principal methods of competition
in cellulose specialties. Product performance is primarily determined by the
purity and uniformity of the cellulose specialties. Our intellectual property,
technical expertise and experience provide the basis by which we are able to
uniformly produce high-value cellulose specialties. Additionally, we are able
to produce high-value, uniform cellulose specialties through our diverse proprietary
manufacturing processes.
We compete with both domestic and foreign producers in cellulose specialties.
Competitors include GP Cellulose (formerly known as Buckeye Technologies), Borregaard,
Bracell, Tembec Sappi, Nippon, Cosmo Specialty Fibers and Aditya Birla Group.
Some competitors use both wood and cotton linter fibers, as a source of cellulose
fibers.
Commodity Products
The principal method of competition in commodity products is price, as purity
and uniformity are less critical differentiators. We compete with both domestic
and foreign producers of commodity products.
For commodity viscose, there are many competitors that derive their commodity
viscose from either wood or cotton. Although cellulose specialties can generally
be sold to meet commodity viscose demand, the reverse is not typically true.
For absorbent materials, major competitors include GP Cellulose, Domtar and
International Paper.
Publicly Traded Peers of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | 550.21 | 1,465.59 |
| Albemarle Corporation | 14,627.81 | 5,907.90 |
| Eastman Chemical Co | 7,663.99 | 8,865.00 |
| Ashland Inc | 3,131.22 | 1,842.00 |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | 2,758.48 | 1,975.35 |
| Photronics Inc | 1,790.90 | 866.28 |
| SUBTOTAL | 34,239.33 | 31,809.62 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
Sources: Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commodity Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Buckeye Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aditya Birla Group | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | Cellulose Specialties 46.41 % |
| Albemarle Corporation | Energy Storage 62.37 % |
| Eastman Chemical Co | Advanced Materials 32.51 % |
| Ashland Inc | Life Sciences 36.22 % |
| Huntsman Corporation | Polyurethanes 58.14 % |
| Quanex Building Products Corporation | Hardware Solutions 46.23 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | 550 | 630,361 | -60,046 |
| Albemarle Corporation | 14,628 | 757,424 | 35,703 |
| Eastman Chemical Co | 7,664 | 681,923 | 34,077 |
| Ashland Inc | 3,131 | 635,172 | 17,586 |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | 2,758 | 420,287 | 20,809 |
| Photronics Inc | 1,791 | 454,023 | 118,412 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 33,689 | 617,690 | -38,901 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | Americas 44.48 % |
| Photronics Inc | Taiwan 33.07 % |
| Huntsman Corporation | Asia Pacific 33.59 % |
| Fmc Corporation | EMEA 40.46 % |
| Ascent Industries Co | United States 95.35 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 13 companies in Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc ranks #7 of 13 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.79 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,086, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimberly clark Corporation | 32,523 | 45.51 % |
| 2 | International Paper Company | 18,167 | 25.42 % |
| 3 | Avery Dennison Corporation | 13,024 | 18.22 % |
| 4 | Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc | 3,965 | 5.55 % |
| 5 | Sylvamo Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Mativ Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | 564 | 0.79 % |
| 8 | Magnera Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ranpak Holdings Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Clearwater Paper Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | International Paper Company | 18,167 | -24.29 % |
| 3 | Avery Dennison Corporation | 13,024 | 7.41 % |
| 4 | Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc | 3,965 | -20.59 % |
| 5 | Sylvamo Corporation | 1,418 | -16.41 % |
| 6 | Mativ Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | 564 | 23.89 % |
| 8 | Magnera Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Ranpak Holdings Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Clearwater Paper Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Mercer International Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 12 | Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Paper & Paper Products industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (22 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 5.90 % | 20.15 % (avg) | -14.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -2.43 % | industry median | -4.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -2.00 % | 7.74 % (avg) | -9.7 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 6.00 % | 4.30 % (avg) | +1.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Paper & Paper Products industry average (22 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 11.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 7.1x | - |
| P/B | 2.1x | 2.4x | -0.3x |
| Return on Equity | -51.76 % | industry aggregate | -44.04 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.24 % | 1.45 % (avg) | -3.69 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -7.72 % | 10.66 % | 122.03 % | -16.82 % | -13.07 % | 22.00 % | -0.69 % | -10.05 % |
| Operating Margin | 15.84 % | 5.93 % | 9.26 % | -3.77 % | -0.74 % | 1.52 % | 2.42 % | 1.33 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 25.84 % | 3.11 % | 6.42 % | -2.27 % | -0.35 % | 0.97 % | 1.70 % | 1.04 % |
| P/E | 9.3x | 3.4x | 6.6x | - | 6.2x | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -2.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Kimberly clark Corporation alone holds 46% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 3,086 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 6.00 % vs industry average 4.30 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 44.0 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (33.30 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Kimberly clark Corporation, holding 45.51 % of industry market cap.
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | 0.19 | 1.47 | 3.60 |
| Albemarle Corporation | 0.64 | 2.17 | 0.26 |
| Eastman Chemical Co | 0.05 | 1.51 | 0.84 |
| Ashland Inc | 0.76 | 2.95 | 0.73 |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | 0.44 | 2.45 | 0.79 |
| Photronics Inc | 2.77 | 4.96 | 0.00 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.6 % | - |
| Albemarle Corporation | Q2 2026 | +31.1 % | +1,318.5 % |
| Eastman Chemical Co | Q2 2026 | +9.9 % | +31.4 % |
| Ashland Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.3 % | - |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.2 % | - |
| Photronics Inc | Q2 2026 | +2.4 % | +81.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.5 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.6 % | -32.3 % |
| Albemarle Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.8 % | -40.0 % |
| Eastman Chemical Co | Q2 2026 | +9.7 % | -33.3 % |
| Ashland Inc | Q2 2026 | -1.2 % | +0.0 % |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | Q2 2026 | +10.2 % | +30.2 % |
| Photronics Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.5 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | - | - | - |
| Albemarle Corporation | 1.73% | 2.07% | 2.74% |
| Eastman Chemical Co | 2.93% | 3.40% | 7.34% |
| Ashland Inc | 1.11% | 1.29% | 2.70% |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | 3.47% | 3.72% | 7.11% |
| Photronics Inc | 11.85% | 10.45% | 13.52% |
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc | - | 0.38 |
| Albemarle Corporation | 394.95 | 2.48 |
| Eastman Chemical Co | 17.36 | 0.86 |
| Ashland Inc | 61.88 | 1.70 |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | 28.59 | 1.40 |
| Photronics Inc | 10.89 | 2.07 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 1.08 |
Sign in to see all peers for Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.