Redwoods Acquisition's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Redwoods Acquisition (RWODU) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Redwoods Acquisition's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | - | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RWODU Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RWODU Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buzzfeed Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Redwoods Acquisition's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Redwoods Acquisition's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Redwoods Acquisition Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | 980.54 | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | 62.25 | 170.71 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,042.79 | 170.71 |
Sources: Redwoods Acquisition Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Redwoods Acquisition Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Redwoods Acquisition's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| ADvantage Therapeutics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Roche | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bristol-Myers/Celgene | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bayer AG | Named by the company | 85% |
| UC San Diego School of Medicine | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lilly | Named by the company | 85% |
| Biogen | Named by the company | 85% |
| Unity Biotechnology | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Redwoods Acquisition's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Redwoods Acquisition's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | 981 | - | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | 62 | 336,708 | -120,714 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 62 | 336,708 | -120,714 |
Redwoods Acquisition's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Buzzfeed Inc | United States 94.25 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Redwoods Acquisition's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 159 companies in Redwoods Acquisition's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Redwoods Acquisition ranks #0 of 159 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,317, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amgen Inc | 229,301 | 26.04 % |
| 2 | Gilead Sciences Inc | 185,269 | 21.04 % |
| 3 | Moderna Inc | 76,643 | 8.70 % |
| 4 | Argenx Se | 63,316 | 7.19 % |
| 5 | Revolution Medicines Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Biogen Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Biontech Se | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Exelixis Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Neurocrine Biosciences Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Halozyme Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Redwoods Acquisition Corp | 304 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Redwoods Acquisition's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2024-06-21.
Redwoods Acquisition's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -137.81 % | -46.44 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Redwoods Acquisition's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,317 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Redwoods Acquisition's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Redwoods Acquisition's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Redwoods Acquisition's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 64.2 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.0% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-15.0% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Redwoods Acquisition's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | 13.70 | 19.76 | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | 0.19 | 0.89 | 0.94 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Redwoods Acquisition's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | Q2 2026 | -21.8 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -21.8 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Redwoods Acquisition's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | Q2 2026 | -18.6 % | -18.0 % |
Redwoods Acquisition's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | - | - | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Redwoods Acquisition's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Redwoods Acquisition Corp | - | - |
| Buzzfeed Inc | - | 0.36 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 6.11 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.