Ring Energy Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ring Energy Inc (REI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ring Energy Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 324M vs 1,039,990M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+29.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+17.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ring Energy Inc generated 26.7% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 41.7% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 61.9% net margin compares with 17.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Ring Energy Inc ranks #80 of 133 companies by market capitalization in the Oil And Gas Production industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Ring Energy Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $2.92M compares with $5.46M for the peer group (0.5x).
- Structure: Ring Energy Inc operates in the following segments: Reportable.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
REI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Ring Energy Inc reported revenue growth of 26.73 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 41.66 %.
With a net margin of 61.90 %, Ring Energy Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (17.79 %).
Ring Energy Inc generated 0.03 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.04 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Ring Energy Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Ring Energy Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ring Energy Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ring Energy Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.2% year over year, combined, vs 26.7% for Ring Energy Inc. Ring Energy Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Ring Energy Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (91) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
REI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
REI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
REI Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
REI Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharkninja Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Laredo Oil Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Calumet Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Apa Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ring Energy Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Ring Energy Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We operate in a highly competitive environment for acquiring properties, marketing oil and natural gas and securing trained personnel. Some of our competitors possess and employ financial resources substantially greater than ours and some of our competitors employ more technical personnel. These factors can be particularly important in the areas in which we operate. Those companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects, and to evaluate, bid for, and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than what our financial or technical resources permit. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to find and develop reserves in the future will depend on our ability to identify, evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. Also, there is substantial competition for capital available for investment in the oil and natural gas industry.
The actual price range of crude oil is largely established by major crude oil purchasers and commodities trading. Pricing for natural gas is based on regional supply and demand conditions. To this extent, we believe we receive oil and gas prices comparable to other producers. There is little risk in our ability to sell all our current production at current prices with a reasonable profit margin. The risk of domestic overproduction at current prices is not deemed significant. We view our primary pricing risk to be related to a potential decline in prices to a level which could render our current production uneconomical.
We are presently committed to use the services of the existing gathering systems of the companies that purchase our natural gas production. This commitment is tied to existing natural gas purchase contracts associated with our production This commitment potentially gives such gathering companies certain short-term relative monopolistic powers to set gathering and transportation costs, because obtaining the services of an alternative gathering company would require substantial additional costs (since an alternative gathering company would be required to lay new pipeline and/or obtain new rights of way to any lease from which we are selling production). We are not subject to third party gathering systems for our oil production. Some of our oil production is sold through a third party pipeline which has no regional competition. All other oil production is transported by the oil purchaser by trucks with competitive trucking costs in the area.
Publicly Traded Peers of Ring Energy Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Ring Energy Inc |
271.10 | 323.84 |
 Exxon Mobil Corporation |
681,982.20 | 396,627.00 |
 Chevron Corp |
413,741.12 | 233,333.00 |
 Shell Plc |
294,098.78 | 266,886.00 |
 Totalenergies Se |
194,179.52 | 162,863.00 |
 Conocophillips |
160,807.83 | 67,749.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,608,324.94 | 1,790,125.21 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Ring Energy Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ring Energy Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ring Energy Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Ring Energy Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Clarus Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Arlo Technologies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Alarm com Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Camping World Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sm Energy Co | Company report | 85% |
| Permian Resources Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Coterra Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Northern Oil And Gas Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Whiting Petroleum Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Pioneer Natural Resources Co | Company report | 85% |
| Riley Exploration Permian Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Gulfport Energy Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Vital Energy inc | Company report | 85% |
| Murphy Oil Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Earthstone Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Kosmos Energy Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Matador Resources Company | Company report | 85% |
| Devon Energy Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Silverbow Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Callon Petroleum Co | Company report | 85% |
| Civitas Resources inc | Company report | 85% |
| Marathon Oil Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Eog Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Crescent Energy Company | Company report | 85% |
| Granite Ridge Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Apa Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Southwestern Energy Company | Company report | 85% |
| Berry Corporation bry | Company report | 85% |
| Us Energy Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Cnx Resources Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Eqt Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Continental Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hess Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Antero Resources Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Comstock Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Chord Energy Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Talos Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Camber Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Expand Energy Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Range Resources Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Goodrich Petroleum Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Ovintiv Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ring Energy Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Ring Energy Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Chevron Corp | Reportable Segment, Aggregation before Other Operating 99.73 % |
| Williams companies inc | Transmission, Power & Gulf 47.62 % |
| Eog Resources Inc | United States of America 98.40 % |
| Imperial Oil Limited | Upstream 43.74 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Oil and gas 95.12 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Ring Energy Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | 271 | 2,917,453 | -2,103,771 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 681,982 | 6,838,397 | 707,224 |
| Chevron Corp | 413,741 | 5,421,432 | 633,751 |
| Shell Plc | 294,099 | 3,139,835 | 213,165 |
| Totalenergies Se | 194,180 | 17,683,279 | 1,450,271 |
| Conocophillips | 160,808 | 6,843,333 | 1,166,061 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,608,054 | 5,462,424 | 529,335 |
Ring Energy Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Sharkninja Inc | North America 66.47 % |
| Sm Energy Co | Permian Basin 50.83 % |
| Granite Ridge Resources Inc | Permian 97.40 % |
| Gran Tierra Energy Inc | Colombia 61.41 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Ring Energy Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 112 companies in Ring Energy Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ring Energy Inc ranks #80 of 112 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.02 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 786, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell Plc | 296,872 | 18.56 % |
| 2 | Totalenergies Se | 210,996 | 13.19 % |
| 3 | Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro Sa | 136,565 | 8.54 % |
| 4 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 105,894 | 6.62 % |
| 5 | Eni Spa | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Eog Resources Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Slb Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Diamondback Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cenovus Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 80 | Ring Energy Inc | 271 | 0.02 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ring Energy Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-09.
Ring Energy Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75 | Natural Gas Services Group Inc | 373 | -0.73 % |
| 76 | Zion Oil and Gas Inc | 360 | 65.74 % |
| 77 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 339 | 136.52 % |
| 78 | Ranger Energy Services inc | 299 | -7.91 % |
| 79 | North American Construction Group Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 80 | Ring Energy Inc | 271 | 13.68 % |
| 81 | New Era Energy and Digital Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 82 | Spirits Time International Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 83 | Pedevco Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 84 | Epsilon Energy Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 85 | Mammoth Energy Services Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ring Energy Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-09. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Ring Energy Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (246 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 26.14 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -0.88 % | industry median | -12.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -0.49 % | 18.57 % (avg) | -19.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 38.45 % | 27.52 % (avg) | +10.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ring Energy Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (246 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil And Gas Production industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 16.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 9.1x | - |
| P/B | 0.4x | 1.9x | -1.5x |
| Return on Equity | -0.29 % | industry aggregate | -12.36 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.18 % | 0.95 % (avg) | -1.13 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Ring Energy Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 116.20 % | 170.20 % | 6.93 % | -41.95 % | 75.48 % | 3.98 % | 1.46 % | -16.15 % |
| Operating Margin | 23.94 % | 11.08 % | 31.21 % | -240.16 % | 48.78 % | 40.38 % | 36.28 % | -13.25 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.44 % | 2.16 % | 4.34 % | -21.93 % | 11.11 % | 7.49 % | 6.27 % | -1.83 % |
| P/E | 173.3x | 40.9x | 5.2x | - | - | 3.0x | 4.5x | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ring Energy Inc's Strategic Group Map
Ring Energy Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Ring Energy Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -27.5% and operating margin of -0.9% compares with an average of -23.2% growth and -4.3% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Ring Energy Inc sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Ring Energy Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Ring Energy Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -2.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Ring Energy Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 786 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 38.45 % vs industry average 27.52 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Ring Energy Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Ring Energy Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Ring Energy Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ring Energy Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+29.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 12.0 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 12.4 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Ring Energy Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.54 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.12 | 1.13 | 0.16 |
| Chevron Corp | 0.01 | 1.21 | 0.20 |
| Shell Plc | 0.37 | 1.30 | 0.05 |
| Totalenergies Se | 0.28 | 0.97 | 0.02 |
| Conocophillips | 0.53 | 1.42 | 0.54 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ring Energy Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | +26.7 % | +214.0 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | +32.7 % | +98.4 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q3 2026 | +36.3 % | +174.7 % |
| Shell Plc | Q4 2025 | -6.1 % | +9.7 % |
| Totalenergies Se | Q4 2025 | -7.1 % | -16.7 % |
| Conocophillips | Q3 2026 | +29.3 % | +131.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +3.9 % | +40.9 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ring Energy Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +125.0 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | -17.7 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q3 2026 | +33.3 % | -9.7 % |
| Shell Plc | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Totalenergies Se | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Conocophillips | Q3 2026 | +26.7 % | - |
Ring Energy Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | - | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 8.87% | 9.71% | 15.39% |
| Chevron Corp | 8.28% | 8.44% | 14.04% |
| Shell Plc | 4.89% | 4.22% | 10.33% |
| Totalenergies Se | 4.59% | 11.37% | 11.37% |
| Conocophillips | 9.33% | 10.36% | 17.73% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ring Energy Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy Inc | - | 0.84 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 17.00 | 1.72 |
| Chevron Corp | 15.35 | 1.77 |
| Shell Plc | 16.49 | 1.10 |
| Totalenergies Se | 17.19 | 1.19 |
| Conocophillips | 14.15 | 2.37 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 15.06 | 1.46 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.